SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Odaily星球日报2024-08-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

过去24小时,加密货币市场集中关注两个焦点,一是IV为什么垮了,二是为什么涨了?币价的上涨带动Vol Skew回升,自看跌一侧的大量抛售更是显著增加了BTC十月到年底斜率。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

过去 24 小时,加密货币市场集中关注两个焦点,一是 IV 为什么垮了,二是为什么涨了?我们可以顺着时间线找到一些线索。

事情开始于 8 月 8 日晚上 7: 30 左右。在此之前,昨日 BTC 的画门行情将市场整体隐含波动率逐步推至高点,而正当价格恢复平静在 57500 附近小幅整盘时,Deribit 市场上突然出现大量 Dec 和 Oct 的卖出看跌期权成交,年底的 IV 短时间内被砸低 3% Vol,带动整条 Vol Curve 大幅向下平移。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Source: SignalPlus Time Lapse IV / Historical IV

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Source: SignalPlus Trade Volume by Expiry; Recent Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Source: Deribit (截至 9 AUG 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

而后来到晚上 08: 30 ,美国公布了新一轮的初请失业金人数,数据下降幅度接近一年来最大,缓解了人们对全球最大经济体经济放缓的担忧,美股强劲反弹(道指/标普/纳指分别收涨 1.76% /2.3% /2.87% ),美债收益率走高。作为与美指高度正相关的风险资产,BTC 价格也受到提振,从 57500 一路上行突破 60000 美元,并一度挑战 62000 这道关键支撑位。

但说回宏观这件事,这周对全球投资者来说都是相当艰难,SoFi 的 Liz Young Thomas 对此评论:“起伏不定,四处皆是。我们了解到市场对美国经济数据的敏感程度,日元套利交易影响的广泛性,以及投资者对降息作为解决一切问题的习惯。”

也正是在如此波动的行情中,市场的焦虑和不安逐渐累积,投资者的情绪一直处于低迷的状态,才让这份通常没被人放在“High-Importance”的数据引如此大的波动。或许本月初开始的恐慌有些夸大,但这份数据并不见得平息了衰退的恐慌。摩根大通的 Lakos-Bujas 向市场发出警告,股市不再是单向上行交易,而是越来越对围绕经济增长下行风险,美联储降息的时机,仓位过多,估值过高,以及总统选举和地缘政治不确定性上升展开的双向辩论。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Source: TradingView; SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

另外,经过这两轮事件后我们观察到,币价的上涨带动 Vol Skew 回升,自看跌一侧的大量抛售更是显著增加了 BTC 十月到年底斜率,使得 25 dRR 指标在局部范围内大幅上行,波动率曲面在一夜之间发生了明显的转变。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Data Source: SignalPlus, ETH Top Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

Data Source: SignalPlus, BTC Top Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240809):两个问题

您可在 t.signalplus.com 使用 SignalPlus 交易风向标功能,获取更多实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlusCN,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:SignalPlus 123)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

İlgili Okumalar

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

**Title:** Grayscale's Guide to Bottom-Fishing: Valuing Cryptoassets Using Cash Flows **Summary:** This report by Grayscale Research presents a fundamental valuation framework for cryptocurrency assets, moving beyond pure speculation to analyze those with underlying cash flows. It distinguishes between "commodity-like" assets (e.g., Bitcoin) and "cash-flow" assets, primarily within DeFi. Using the leading decentralized lending protocol Aave as a case study, the analysis applies traditional financial methodologies like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiples. Key findings indicate that AAVE tokens are currently undervalued. Despite recent challenges, the protocol's strong revenue growth, ~50% net profit margin, and diversified treasury support a fundamental valuation range of $80-$100 per token (compared to a ~$75 market price at the time of writing). In a base-case scenario driven by stablecoin adoption and regulatory clarity, the fair value could rise to around $175 within a year. The report emphasizes that protocol success does not automatically translate to token value. It critically examines the "value capture" mechanisms—such as buybacks, burns, and staking rewards—that channel protocol profits to token holders. Furthermore, it addresses the legal and governance complexities of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), noting their difference from traditional corporate equity but highlighting how robust, transparent governance can align protocol economics with holder interests. The conclusion is that the crypto market is maturing, with capital increasingly flowing towards projects with demonstrable fundamentals, real adoption, and disciplined capital allocation, creating opportunities for value-based investors.

marsbit48 dk önce

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

marsbit48 dk önce

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

After US-Iran talks led to a temporary ceasefire and framework for reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz, U.S. stocks rose on June 18, with the Nasdaq gaining 1.9%. The semiconductor and AI hardware sectors outperformed. This rally stemmed primarily from reduced geopolitical risk, which lowered oil prices and inflation expectations, easing discount rate pressure on high-valuation growth stocks like tech. The key question is not whether tech rebounded, but the nature of the rebound. The market appears to be selectively repricing AI infrastructure plays rather than broadly chasing AI narratives. Gains were concentrated in chips, optical interconnects, memory, and domestic manufacturing—segments tied to tangible data center build-outs and capital expenditure. Intel's ~10% surge, fueled by a Trump statement about potential Apple collaboration, exemplifies this mixed dynamic. It reflects policy catalysts and domestic manufacturing sentiment more than confirmed fundamentals. Meanwhile, strong earnings from companies like Astera Labs (revenue up 93% YoY) provided concrete evidence of AI-driven demand in hardware. In essence, the rally represents a risk-premium recalibration. Lower Middle East tensions opened a valuation repair window, and capital flowed first into AI infrastructure segments with visible near-term revenue streams. The sustainability of this move hinges on upcoming Q2 earnings, specifically continued strength in cloud provider capex, AI server orders, and hardware company guidance. Policy hopes alone are insufficient; the cycle needs validation from orders and financials.

marsbit53 dk önce

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

marsbit53 dk önce

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

While the AI community celebrates Noam Shazeer, co-author of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper, joining OpenAI as Head of Architectural Research, the company's audited financials reveal a starkly different reality. In 2025, OpenAI reported $13.07 billion in revenue but a massive $20.92 billion operating loss. Even excluding a one-time accounting charge, the cash burn is severe, with $3.7 billion consumed in Q1 2026 alone. This high-profile hiring occurs against a backdrop of significant internal research talent drain, with key founders and researchers departing as the company's focus shifts from exploratory research to product iteration. Meanwhile, OpenAI's fundamental business model faces a deep crisis. It paid Microsoft $10.59 billion for compute in 2025, while its vast user base of 9 billion weekly actives includes only 50 million paying customers, making growth a direct driver of escalating costs. The article argues Shazeer's recruitment is less about technical necessity and more about crafting a compelling narrative for OpenAI's upcoming IPO, aiming to justify a rumored $1 trillion valuation to future public market investors. It contrasts OpenAI's strategy with Anthropic's reported path to profitability, which relies on a strong enterprise customer base and cost control, rather than star-powered narratives. Ultimately, the piece concludes that while Shazeer's architectural work may take 1-2 years to materialize, OpenAI's financial clock is ticking much faster, with its massive losses undercutting the celebratory headlines.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片