币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

Odaily星球日报2024-08-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

今年以来,Jupiter上的合约玩家总共只赚了370万美元,而他们给JLP贡献了1.368亿美元的手续费。

没有永远赚钱的赌徒,但有永远赚钱的赌场,那么在链上,可不可以也靠「投资赌场」来赚钱呢?在推出 JLP 后,Jupiter 似乎给出了一个答案。

今年以来,Jupiter 的永续合约平台 JLP(Jupiter liquidity provider)成为了表现最好、收益最高的赌场之一。据Dune 数据,仅 8 月 5 日一天开仓费就达 247.5 万美元,而每笔开仓费仅 0.0006 美元。但据flyingfish 数据,从今年年初至今,在 Jupiter 上玩合约的玩家,总共只赚了 370 万美元,而他们给 JLP 贡献了 1.368 亿美元的手续费。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

8 月 5 日大盘暴跌,加密资产全面崩盘,以太坊抹平年内涨幅,SOL 也一路下跌触及 110 美元。然而,在底层资产都是比特币、以太坊和 SOL 的情况下,JLP 跌幅却较底层资产小,不少人开始好奇,为什么 JLP 这么抗跌?

合约玩家:开仓那一刻起就在欠债

在 JLP 上,用户的交易对手方是平台本身,当交易者寻求开杠杆头寸时,他们从池中借入代币,由预言机直接喂价。这种模式也被称为「合伙开赌场」,即用户赚钱,平台亏钱。

JLP 池支持五种资产:SOL、ETH、WBTC、USDC、USDT,合约支持 1.1 x-10 0x 的杠杆倍数,从 JLP 池中借出相关流动性,在平仓后,交易者获取收益或了结亏损,并将剩余代币返还给 JLP 池。

以做多 SOL 为例,假设 SOL 价格 150 美元,开设 5 倍杠杆,即向池子中借出 5 枚 SOL,价值 750 美元。若 SOL 价格上涨至 160 美元,仓位升至 800 美元,交易者获利平仓。平仓后,交易者需归还最初的 750 美元本金,总盈利 50 美元。但对于平台来说,由于此时 SOL 上涨,本金价不足 5 枚 SOL,因此平台 U 本位资金不变,而币本位处于亏损状态。

若 SOL 价格下跌至 140 美元,仓位仅剩 700 美元,交易者止损平仓,因此交易者需将剩余 700 美元的资产还给平台,并补交 50 美元。由于 SOL 下跌, 50 美元对应的 SOL 数量增加,平台币本位处于盈利状态,U 本位资金依旧不变。同理,做空 SOL 则需借出稳定币。

JLP 与一般永续合约最大的不同点可能就在于,后者可能会出现负费率的情况,为了让永续合约的价格贴近现货价格,平台会补贴利率,但是在 JLP 的情况下,并不存在平台补贴。

无论盈利还是亏损,开仓本金都来自 JLP 平台,因此,无论做多还是做空,从开仓那一刻起,交易者就在欠平台的债。据JLP Pool页面显示,目前 JLP 的 APR 为 72.47% ,但该数据每周更新一次,与实际收益有所差距。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

可直接在合约交易页面手动计算,不同池子的利率不同,即下图中的借款费率(Borrow rate)。若以 SOL 的利率来算,每小时 0.0028%(x24 小时 x365 天),年化达 24.53%,同理,以太坊年化 16.64%,比特币年化 44.68%,即总年化为 85.58%。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

从左至右分别是 SOL、ETH、wBTC 的合约相关费用 

JLP 投资者:收益与亏损都小于底层资产

交易产生的费用会反映到平台代币 JLP 上。据官方介绍,JLP 的价值来自三个方面。

一是建仓、平仓、借贷费用以及资金池交易费用的 75% 。由于能拿到平台手续费分成,因此这部分的 JLP 净值基本处于上涨状态。

二是来自 5 种底层资产,理论上(下图中的 Target Welghtage),一枚 JLP 价格由 44% 的 SOL、 10% 的 ETH、 11% 的 WBTC、 26% 的 USDC 和 9% 的 USDT 组成。在官方平台页面上也会根据这些因素计算出 JLP 的净值,目前为 3.18 美元。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

SOL、以太坊和比特币的上涨与下降也会让 JLP 随之变化。因此有社区成员认为,逢低抄底 JLP 是个不错的选择,不仅可以吃到底层资产的涨幅,又能吃到平台手续费。

然而仔细对比 JLP 和其余资产的涨跌幅可发现,JLP 的波动都要更小。最主要的原因就是 JLP 的价值组成中, 35% 来自稳定币(USDT 和 USDC),而稳定币的价格并不会出现剧烈波动。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

为了更具体比较 JLP 涨幅,DeFi 研究员 @22333D计算了 5 月 7 日至 5 月 19 日,JLP 与等份额的 SOL、以太坊和比特币的价格变化,发现 JLP 涨幅是最小的,其中 JLP 涨幅 5.3% ,而对应的 SOL、以太坊和比特币涨幅总计 6.8% 。

@ 2233 3D 解释,不足的部分可能来自 JLP 平台的币本位亏损。这也是 JLP 价值的第三部分来源,即交易者盈亏,其与 JLP 价格成负相关。假如一个交易员赚了非常多钱,那 JLP 的净值就会下降,相当于 JLP 的资产组成被合约玩家赚走了,反之亦然。

虽然短期来看,平台也会处于亏损状态,但据flyingfish 数据,自今年以来,JLP 的盈利总体上大于亏损。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

把 JLP 当理财?

目前,可以直接在 JLP 官网通过 Jupiter 现价单购买 JLP,实现 0 手续费。购买的一部分 JLP 来自 LP 提供,一部分是新铸造的 JLP。当 JLP 达到 TVL 限制(7 亿美元)时将停止铸造,目前 TVL 达 5.91 亿美元。

币圈「最佳定投标的」JLP,为什么这么抗跌?

@ 2233 3D 指出,如果用 SOL 购买 JLP,那可以等同于把 56% 的 SOL 换成了稳定币、以太坊和比特币。再用占 JLP 总仓位 35% 的资金量做多 SOL,就可以用对冲的方式实现 SOL 的理财。

如果用 USDT 或 USDC 购买 JLP,可以用占 JLP 总仓位 44% 的资金量做空 SOL, 10% 做空以太坊、 11% 做空比特币,这样其实就把 JLP 变成了一个稳定币本位的理财产品。

除此之外,JLP 也有别的套利玩法,比如在 Solana 借贷平台 Kamino 存入 JLP,借出稳定币后再买入 JLP,实现杠杆挖矿。但正因为 JLP 的赌场因素使其价格存在不可控风险,无论是作为合约玩家或是代币投资者,均需谨慎处理,DYOR。

İlgili Okumalar

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit4 dk önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit4 dk önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit8 dk önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit8 dk önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit13 dk önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit13 dk önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手18 dk önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手18 dk önce

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

Crypto Mining Firms' AI Bet: Valuation Divergence and a Challenging Transformation Facing declining profitability in crypto mining, mining companies are pivoting to AI infrastructure, capitalizing on their existing power resources, land, and data center expertise to offer GPU compute power. This transition narrative has boosted their stock prices significantly, with firms like Hut 8 and Bitfarms seeing gains over 100% year-to-date, far outpacing Bitcoin. This has led to a market valuation split, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a $62.8B market cap, while others remain below $5B. The market currently prioritizes growth potential over short-term profits, which remain under pressure due to heavy capital expenditures for AI build-outs and crypto asset volatility. However, the transformation is a high-stakes gamble. Bitcoin mining profitability is shrinking, with the average production cost around $63,707 and miner margins contracting. While AI offers a more lucrative long-term path, it requires massive investment—estimated at a $500B near-term funding gap. Success now hinges on execution: delivering on contracted power capacity, securing quality tenants like major cloud providers, and managing the immense financial burden. The valuation focus is shifting from mere power capacity to project delivery, future cash flows, and tenant quality, making this a difficult but critical turnaround attempt.

链捕手27 dk önce

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

链捕手27 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片