大户都在逢机抄底、跌了就是机会而不是去等更低

币界网2024-08-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-07 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

周二金融市场全面反弹,投资者利用回调逢低买入,美股和加密货币有所回升,尽管价格仍远低于抛售前的水平。

截至当天收盘,标普、道指、纳指均上涨,涨幅分别为 1.04%、0.76%、1.03%。黄金因避险需求减弱下跌 0.63%。

比特币(BTC)从 54,000 美元的支撑位攀升至周二 57,100 美元的高位,重新获得自 2 月底以来交易区间低端的支撑。 截至发稿时,比特币交易价格为 56900美元,24 小时涨幅 2.25%。

山寨币出现两位数复苏,除稳定币外,市值前 200 大代币均实现上涨。目前加密货币整体市值为 2 万亿美元,比特币的占有率为 55.9%。

巨鲸逢低买入

比特币巨鲸(即大型资产持有者)抓住价格下跌的机会进行加仓,而小投资者则在恐慌随之而来时抛售。

持有 1,000 至 10,000 BTC 的加密钱包,按当前价格计算价值约为 5600 万美元至 5.6 亿美元,「在最近的下跌中表现出信心,在价格下跌时持续增加持股」。

v2-ae6d71fc26c3cb58030f765ffe720ec5_720w.webp

与此同时,持有少于 1 个 BTC 的钱包「表现较弱,在昨日的市场低迷期间,持有量大幅下降」。

要想重回上升趋势需要站上5.9

过去两周发生了很多变化。如果我们之前讨论的是 BTC 是否会突破 69,000 美元,那么现在我们则在关注 53000 美元的水平能否能撑住。由于市场动荡,比特币在过去两周内下跌了 30%。

v2-b1c8c588d174a388a7d2e74aef331dbf_720w.webp

底部形成于略低于 50,000 美元的位置,反弹正在进行中。如果我们想很快看到反弹延续,我们需要 BTC 的周线图收于关键周线水平 59,000 美元上方。否则,我们可能很快就会看到低于 50,000 美元的水平。

由于比特币未能在周线图上创下更高的高点,我们现在有三个较低的高点和三个较低的低点,表明我们仍处于下行趋势中。

关于以太坊的走势,与 BTC 类似,ETH 需要收复 2,600 美元,这是推动 ETH 冲向 4,000 美元的关键水平。如果这不发生,我们可能会看到它测试 2,000 美元,另一方面,突破该水平将使 ETH 达到 2,800 美元,然后达到 3,300 美元。

BTC 市值与实际价值 (MVRV) 比率已跌破其 365 天移动平均线,这种情况在历史周期中预示着价格下跌的延续。在 2020 年 3 月的 COVID-19 崩盘、2021 年 5 月的低迷期间以及 2021 年 11 月熊市开始时,同一关键支撑位都被突破。

大家应该监控这些估值指标,以评估价格反弹或进一步回调的可能性。

v2-75400e1880274f8cb9d845da728247d6_720w.webp

只要比特币可以保持在 45,000 美元以上,就可能再次突破历史最高点。虽然现在一些指标显示出看跌信号。但其实仍有可能反弹,因此需要观察它是否会在这个水平上维持一两周。如果持续时间较长,熊市风险就会增大,如果持续时间超过一个月,复苏可能会很困难。

加密货币市场的前景依然看好

黄金和比特币都是供应量有限的货币资产,对宏观经济事件和趋势的反应相似。比特币作为价值存储的潜力更大,未来 5-10 年内,黄金和比特币的市值可能会持平。尽管短期内可能存在影响比特币或黄金价格的因素,但从长期来看,比特币的价格升值潜力大于黄金。随着越来越多的投资者意识到比特币作为数字硬通货和财富保值工具的地位,比特币的机构需求将增加。

投资策略建议

针对当前的行情,我觉得比较类似 20 年 312 行情,都是由衰退引起的市场恐慌带来的抛压。

关注宏观经济数据:密切关注美国的非农就业数据、失业率和制造业 PMI 等宏观经济指标。这些数据将对市场情绪和资产价格产生重要影响。

长期持有策略:对于看好比特币长期前景的投资者,可以采取长期持有策略,忽略短期市场波动,关注比特币的长期升值潜力。

利用技术分析:使用技术分析工具,如相对强弱指数(RSI)和移动平均线(EMA),识别市场趋势和买入时机。在近期市场下跌后,技术分析可以帮助确定合适的买入点。

近期加密货币市场和美股市场的剧烈波动,主要受到美国就业市场降温、制造业萎缩以及投资者对经济衰退的担忧影响。同时,加密货币领域的破产重组事件和供应量增加也加剧了市场的下行压力。尽管短期内市场面临较大不确定性,但从长期来看,加密货币市场尤其是比特币的前景依然看好。

做好自己的策略,以应对市场波动,布局未来的市场机会。

后期会给大家带来其他赛道的龙头项目分析。感兴趣的可以点个关注。我也会不定期整理一些前沿资询和项目点评,欢迎各位志同道合的币圈人一起来探索。有问题可以评论提问或者私

İlgili Okumalar

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片