交易笔记：我如何用 100 美金赚到人生第一个 100 万？

深潮2024-08-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-01 tarihinde güncellendi

从最初的谨慎试水，到后来的无脑买首发新币，靠的就是信息差。

混迹币圈多年，也算是见证了无数人以小博大，实现财富自由。无一例外，要不是平台加成，要不是运气使然，要不就是赤裸裸的信息差。这次我依靠信息差和手速用100U赚到了人生的第一个100万，大概经历了20天，这个过程谈不上惊心动魄和高危操作，主要就是对于信息的甄别和对LBank的"全球首发"无脑信任。今年以来，在MEME币市场如此火热的情况下，这三家竟然都选择性忽视了MEME币赛道，看到周围很多群友都在冲MEME币，挣了不少钱，我也拿出来一点点资金，想要试试水，看能不能在MEME币赚它一把。

然后，我研究了几个不断上新MEME币的交易所，包括：Poloniex、BitMart、CoinEx、XT、LBank等。这几家交易所我都放了一点资金，然后也跟着市场的情绪和交易所的公告，时不时冲几个MEME币。然后在同步对比使用了这些交易所几次以后，我选择了LBank重点使用，然后同步做了数据记录，现在顺着时间以“炒币日记”的形式梳理给大家。至于为什么会选择LBank，在大家看完炒币日记后，我会给大家说一下原因。

下面就是我的炒币日记，截图为证。

7月10日，大饼：阴

今天，我在LBank上开启了我的第一笔交易,13:00开盘，立刻以0.008001的价格买入价值100U的$ROCKY。然后进行等待，最高涨到了0.04003，没想到这个板块这么牛，第一笔交易就翻了五倍，立刻收手，等待下次时机。

7月11日，大饼：晴转阴

LBank没有全球首发项目，等……

7月12日，大饼：多云转晴

LBank没有全球首发项目，再等等……

7月13日，大饼：晴

LBank还是没有全球首发项目，等不了了，我要告到“币圈委员会”

7月14日，大饼：晴

等到今天，LBank终于有全球首发上线了，23:00上线了$FIGHT，立刻买入，价格0.01，这次看市场热度非常大，一直持有，期间又上线了$FIGHTSOL，但我一直对仿盘不感冒，继续持有。

7月15日，大饼：晴朗，万里无云

继续持有$FIGHT，今日涨幅69.68%，这数据看着就要发，再持有观望一下。

7月16日，大饼：大雨转晴

果然，先得到消息的人能够稳坐收益台，后来的很难居上，随着其他交易所陆陆续续上线$FIGHT，我的收益持续翻倍，今日涨幅高达230.89%，再拿一会儿，明天再议。

7月17日，大饼：阴

今日操作复杂，流水账：一直持有$FIGHT到今天，看到全球首发要在13:00上线$MAPE，我在12点选择清空$FIGHT，价格0.081，七倍收益；

在13：00以0.0000315价格买入$MAPE；买入没多久，我又看到17:30 $FEARNOT要上线，因为这个跟川普强关联，我选择在17点清空$MAPE，价格0.0000402，盈利27.62%；

17:30以0.00004价格买入$FEARNOT，结果这次价格一直走低。

7月18日，大饼：阴晴不定

今天，又有新币上线，因为$FEARNOT跌了很多，我选择换币，在12：30换成$MIGGLES。$FEARNOT售价0.000035，0.875倍收益，这单折损12.5%。

$MIGGLES买入价0.025，虽然LBank在13:00又上线了$SWAG，但是我看市场上热度明显$MIGGLES更大，我选择持有$MIGGLES。（后话：我一卖出$FEARNOT,他就翻倍了，可恶）

接下来我一直持有$MIGGLES，等到下一次操作，期间$MIGGLES最高涨到0.1，我没有卖出，还是持有了。

7月19日，大饼：晴

今天13:00，LBank全球首发又来，这个时候$MIGGLES价格0.81，果断选择换币，买入$BILL，价格0.00002。$MIGGLES2.24倍收益顺利到手。

接下来我重复操作，只要有全球首发上新，我就清空之前代币，梭哈新币

7月22日13:00，换成$DMAGA ，$DMAGA 几乎没赚没亏；

7月22日13:30，换成$KAMA，$KAMA赚了68.3%；

7月25日14:00，换成$HARRIS ，大亏，亏了一半，亏了51.88%；

7月26日13:00，换成$SCF，$SCF赚了64%；

7月29日14:00，换成$NEIROETH，赚了404.62%；

本金100U，目前账户余额187,532.03U，折合人民币1,365,233元。

现在大家应该明白，我为什么要选择LBank了吗？MEME币的涨跌幅在市场初期是非常剧烈的，通过我的操作周期，大家应该能发现，要想在MEME币领域挣钱，最重要的是时间差，时间差体现在交易所的形式就是上币的早晚，而LBank在上线MEME币这方面就很迅速，而且数量很多，所以才会有机会进行财富的迅速积累。

孔子太多，鲁班太少

比起今天跟钱包合作了，明天又什么冠名了，我宁愿选择人狠话少的平台。这行业到现在了，依然孔子太多，鲁班太少。我在分享这些之前，其实想了很久，要不要这么露骨地分享出来这些，因为财富故事，大部分的人从18年听到了现在，耳朵没茧，眼睛也快干了。但当我看到账户余额增加时，这种喜悦与成就感难以言表。也许这100万对于这个行业很多人来说，并不算什么（起码从大家的嘴里说的，是这么感觉的），但确实是我一步步实际完成的。

作为一个最普通的交易用户，平台的高举高打，其实很多时候，跟我们并没有什么关系（实话），但我也理解随着平台越来越卷，不管是用户成本还是平台活动，很多平台越做越跟散户越没关系，更多只在乎大户的权益和手续费贡献。并且，我觉得很夸张的一件事是，很多交易所为了深度和流动性看起来更好，把很多MEME Alpha币种选择不上，等量还OK后，再选择上币。那散户炒币的根本意义又在哪？回望这短短二十天的经历，从最初的谨慎试水，到后来的无脑买首发新币，靠的就是信息差。LBank带给我信息差。

币圈，机会很多；但信息差，也真的很重要。MEME很香，交易所就该踏踏实实干好服务用户的事儿。

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto1 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto1 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手2 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手2 saat önce

Crypto Lobby Pushes Congress To Keep Staking And Mining Tax Bill Intact

Crypto advocacy groups are urging U.S. lawmakers to pass the Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act (H.R. 9175) without changes. The bill seeks to clarify that rewards for proof-of-work miners and proof-of-stake validators are taxed only when the assets are sold, not immediately when received. This deferred tax treatment is crucial for operators' cash flow and profitability. The proposal faces opposition from banking interests, who argue it could give crypto yield products an unfair advantage over traditional savings. The outcome will impact network decentralization, as complex tax rules could push out smaller operators. The lobbying effort marks an expansion of crypto's policy focus beyond market structure into tax rules that underpin network economics. The bill's fate depends on whether Congress advances it as a standalone clarification or part of a broader digital-asset package.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Crypto Lobby Pushes Congress To Keep Staking And Mining Tax Bill Intact

bitcoinist2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片