从叙事和估值出发,分析 8 个可能会“失败”的代币

链捕手2024-07-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-30 tarihinde güncellendi

原文来源:ardizor X 账号

作者:ardizor, 加密研究员

编译:Felix, PANews

 

在购买任何代币之前,明智的投资者至少应该分析以下关键因素:

  • 市值(MC)
  • FDV
  • 未来解锁情况
  • 代币需求
  • 叙事

该类分析将有助于确定代币是否值得持有,以及是否具备上涨潜力。但98%的山寨币注定要失败,因为它们根本没有任何潜力。比如,如果你在2021年11月投资1万美元AXS ,那么今天就只剩下382.5美元。

此外,从下图可看出,在90天内,只有TON、SOL、Memes和BTC表现出显著的增长。其他所有所谓的“高技术”山寨币都纷纷下跌。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

如果不想看到自己的钱随着时间的流逝而消失,那么应该避免持有以下三种山寨币类型。

  • 过时和被高估的项目

这类项目通常没有技术,因为都是虚构出来的。随着时间的推移,它们与ETH相比价值会逐渐降低,就像现在看到的那样。

  • 与过去叙事相关的项目

典型特点是高FDV,低市值和持续的抛压。这些代币已经失去了叙事相关性,并正在逐渐衰落。

  • 价格虚高的代币

这类代币的供应受到团队或风投的严格控制,导致估值被操纵。

基于上述三种类型,加密研究员ardizor盘点了8种注定会“失败”的代币。

PANews注:本文旨在提供市场信息,不构成投资意见,DYOR。

XMR

你们可能都知道门罗币(Monero)的匿名性和交易的隐私性。

XMR是最古老的加密代币之一。然而,自2022年以来,XMR的价格并没有太大变化,而且未来可能会像Tornado Cash一样遭禁。

最重要的是,Binance今年将其下架,这或许是“压倒骆驼的最后一根稻草”。

短线高估,前景黯淡,风险高。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

FLOW

Flow是一条权益证明区块链,旨在成为Web3和开放元宇宙的基础,支持消费者规模的去中心化应用程序、NFT、DeFi、DAO、PFP项目等。

不幸的是,市场对该项目的兴趣已经消退,导致其价值下降。

这是由于来自风投的持续抛压,以及围绕NFT的炒作减少。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

XRP

XRP专为快速和低成本的全球交易而设计。然而,这是BTC的不必要分叉,估值过高。

XRP有一群狂热的追随者,但还没开发者Charles Hoskinson也很古怪,作者觉得他有“精神分裂”。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

AXS

此处列举的不仅适用于Axie Infinity,还适用于其他资深P2E代币,如SAND和MANA 。

市场对其的兴奋感已经消失,而且FDV相当高。

围绕这些代币的炒作已经消失,价格复苏无望。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

DYDX

DYDX的关键挑战在于代币解锁。

这些解锁机制的设计旨在稳定抛压,但导致价格持续下跌。

许多项目都面临这个问题,所以如果项目想要生存下去,审查解锁时间表至关重要。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

WLD

WLD本质上是一种虚构的代币,其供应量受到主要参与者和内部人员的严格管理,他们总是在抛售代币。胜算并不在散户这边。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

BCH

比特币现金(BCH)是BTC的一个分叉,旨在增加区块大小并同时处理更多交易。

然而,BCH本质上与比特币相似,没有重大变化。基本上,这只是一个假的比特币。为什么需要假的比特币?有看到一个真正聪明的人支持它。XRP不是最糟糕的代币,但ETH或BTC更好。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

ADA

ADA与XRP类似,但没有任何诉讼问题。

ADA拥有一个疯狂的社区,即使价格跌至0.0000001美元,他们也会牢牢持有自己的代币。

从叙事和估值出发,盘点8个可能会“失败”的代币

İlgili Okumalar

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

Standard Chartered Bank has issued an optimistic research report predicting that the AAVE token could surge 50-fold to $3,500 by 2030. This forecast is based on the projection that the total value locked (TVL) in DeFi will grow 37x to approximately $2.7 trillion, driven by stablecoin expansion and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The bank's model links Aave's potential valuation directly to its protocol revenue, which is primarily driven by net interest margins. The report highlights Aave's current dominant position, noting it captures over 80% of the net earnings ("protocol retained earnings") in the lending sector while holding only about half of its TVL. It also points to the recent launch of the Aave V4 architecture and a healthy revenue stream of $142 million in 2025 as positive fundamentals. Grayscale's separate analysis, applying traditional valuation metrics like DCF, concluded AAVE is currently undervalued. However, the article notes significant challenges. Aave's peer-to-pool lending model suffers from inherent capital inefficiency, with an estimated $52 million annual "deadweight loss" due to idle funds needed for liquidity buffers. This structural flaw was exposed during the April KelpDAO exploit, which locked a WETH pool at 100% utilization for days. Emerging protocols like Morpho, with more efficient point-to-point models, are cited as growing competitive threats. In summary, while institutional forecasts paint a macro picture of massive growth fueled by RWA adoption, Aave's path forward hinges on addressing its core structural limitations and competitive pressures within the evolving DeFi lending landscape.

链捕手14 dk önce

Standard Chartered Bank’s 50-Fold Fantasy: Predicting AAVE to Reach $3,500

链捕手14 dk önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手1 saat önce

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手1 saat önce

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit1 saat önce

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片