Coinbase因高风险客户被英国监管机构罚款450万美元

币界网2024-07-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-26 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

周四,Coinbase因服务于高风险客户而被英国监管机构金融行为监管局(FCA)处以450万美元的罚款。该罚款是对该交易所的子公司CB Payments Limited(CBPL)征收的。

另请阅读:Coinbase寻求法院命令美国证券交易委员会出示与Gensler相关的文件

FCA指责CBPL违反了一些监管要求,以改善其对金融犯罪的防范,据路透社报道,这是英国加密资产行业首次实施此类制裁。

FCA抨击CBPL一再违反协议

据FCA称,CBPL同意在监管机构于2020年10月访问后,通过改善其金融犯罪控制,不会接受任何新的高风险客户。然而,该公司继续为13416名高风险客户提供电子货币服务,其中近三分之一的客户存入了2490万美元。

监管机构进一步表示,客户通过Coinbase实体进行了总计2.26亿美元的加密资产交易。近两年来,该公司多次违反自愿协议,未被发现。

FCA执法联合执行董事Therese Chambers表示:“CBPL的控制措施存在重大缺陷,FCA也表示了这一点,这就是为什么需要这些要求。”。钱伯斯补充道:“然而,CBPL一再违反这些要求。”。

监管机构表示,CBPL在其财务控制的“设计、测试、实施和监控方面缺乏应有的技能和勤勉”。

Coinbase的罚款是认真对待犯罪控制的警告

CBPL同意解决此事,并在获得30%的折扣后支付450万美元(350万英镑)。

Coinbase表示:“我们非常重视FCA的调查结果和我们更广泛的监管合规性,CBPL继续积极加强控制,以确保遵守其监管义务。”。

Signature litigation的加密诉讼律师Kate Gee表示,这是对公司非常重视金融犯罪控制的警告。

“那些在防范金融犯罪方面做得不够,也没有遵守现行运营限制的公司将面临审查和执法行动。”哎呀。

FCA还指出,这一行动是根据英国2011年的电子货币法规实施的,也是监管机构首次使用这些权力采取执法行动。

另请阅读:Coinbase大肆宣传Miggles先生代币,以从以太坊和Solana获得流动性

这也发生在需要明确的监管框架的时候,这是加密资产行业面临的问题之一。PYMNTS表示,尽管仍存在一些差距,但监管机构正在为加密货币行业制定框架,欧洲加密资产市场(MiCA)提供了一种更统一的监管方法。

İlgili Okumalar

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight News18 dk önce

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight News18 dk önce

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

**How to Detect AI-Generated Videos: A Survey on Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems** With rapid advances in AI video generation (e.g., Sora, Veo), creating highly realistic, multi-minute videos is now possible, widening the gap with detection research. Current AI video detection, often limited to unreliable binary classifications, is insufficient. This survey, accepted at ACL 2026, reframes the goal as **"factual fidelity verification"**—checking if a video's content (who, when, where, what) aligns with the real world perceptually and cognitively. It categorizes AI-generated videos into three paradigms: **Local Manipulation Videos (LMV**, e.g., face swaps), **Audio-Visual Editing (AVE**, e.g., lip-syncing), and **Generative Video Synthesis (GVS**, fully synthetic videos like Sora's). Detection challenges evolve from visual artifacts in LMV to multi-modal inconsistencies in AVE and higher-level world knowledge violations in GVS. The core proposal is a **Vision-Language Dual-View framework** with four hierarchical layers: 1. **Layer 1 (Intrinsic Visual Cues):** Analyzes low-level signal statistics, noise patterns, and physiological signals. 2. **Layer 2 (Spatiotemporal Consistency):** Checks for temporal coherence in object motion and scene dynamics. 3. **Layer 3 (Cross-Modal Consistency):** Verifies alignment between video, audio, and text within the video. 4. **Layer 4 (Language-Guided World-Level Reasoning):** Uses external knowledge, facts, and physical laws to judge semantic plausibility and factual correctness. The survey traces a shift in detection focus from lower layers (1 & 2) toward higher, language-involved layers (3 & 4). It also reviews evolving evaluation metrics and datasets tailored for each video paradigm. The conclusion advocates for a **dynamic, evidence-first detection system** that moves beyond simple classification. Future trustworthy detection requires combining visual evidence (from CV) with semantic reasoning and explanation (from NLP & multimodal AI), ultimately creating traceable and explainable judgments about a video's adherence to real-world constraints.

marsbit55 dk önce

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

marsbit55 dk önce

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

The article explores the surprising trend where AI's first major impact on crypto has been in security auditing, not in areas like trading or analytics. It details how AI-powered tools are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding smart contract vulnerabilities, enabling attackers to scan thousands of contracts and execute exploits within minutes. This has rendered traditional, manually-produced audit reports with their month-long validity periods increasingly obsolete, creating a critical "structural crack" in the old security model. Cases like Drift Protocol and KelpDAO show that even extensively audited protocols can be hacked through social engineering, operational flaws, or infrastructure misconfigurations beyond pure code review. Attackers are also using AI to find and exploit vulnerabilities in years-old, deployed contracts. Notably, OpenZeppelin's co-founder has expressed a grim view that "all DeFi is insecure" due to AI's asymmetric advantage. In response, the audit industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. While there's a short-term spike in defensive re-audits, the long-term business model is changing. Firms are developing AI-assisted systems and moving from one-time report deliveries towards embedded, continuous services like real-time monitoring and formal verification. Examples include AI tools uncovering critical, previously missed vulnerabilities in heavily audited protocols like Curve Finance and Zcash. The conclusion is that security must become a continuous investment, not a one-time checkbox, and audit firms must rapidly evolve their tools and service models to survive.

marsbit1 saat önce

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片