“加密货币差价合约现在非常受欢迎:”Match Prime Liquidity的首席执行官

币界网2024-07-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-23 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

Match Prime Liquidity首席执行官Andreas Kapsos在2024年iFX EXPO国际博览会上与Finance Magnates交谈时表示:“有一些新资产正在发挥作用。”他补充说:“加密货币差价合约和ESG也是其中之一。”

“加密货币的差价合约现在非常受欢迎。对于流动性提供商来说,这是他们需要掌握的东西。当他们渗透到新市场时,会对这些产品提出新的要求。”

尽管经纪商通常不会分享加密货币差价合约的数据,但Finance Magnates早些时候独家报道称,Axi去年3月处理了167亿美元的加密货币差价交易量。1月份的数字为76亿美元,2月份为104亿美元。

“有备份总是好的”

在过去的四年里,Kapsos一直领导着Match Prime流动性。他是一位经验丰富的行业高管,曾与BrightFX Capital和CAPEX.com等公司合作。在iFX EXPO International上,他还参加了关于流动性提供商未来的小组讨论。

他指出,经纪商需要一个或多个流动性提供者,他说:“我总是建议客户拥有多个。归根结底,我们希望客户得到最好的,所以对客户来说最好的是拥有多个流动资金提供者。”

“然而,这取决于客户的生命周期,”Kapsos说,并补充道,“但我肯定会建议有时拥有两个或三个以上的客户。原因很明显:当你的业务中有一些非常重要的东西,比如流动性,如果你的一个流动性提供者出了问题,有一个备份总是好的。”

“此外,增加一个也很重要,因为你可以比较服务,”他补充道。“你有这种影响力;你可以比较价格,然后你就可以为自己买到最好的产品。”

Match Prime总部位于塞浦路斯,与其姊妹品牌Match Trade Technologies并肩运营。今年早些时候,这两家公司在同一家母公司的领导下,在迪拜开设了一个新的联合办事处,以更好地与中东和北非地区不断增长的客户群互动并为其提供支持。

“人工智能帮助我们知道需求在哪里”

在扩张的同时,即使是像Match Prime这样的流动性提供商也感受到了人工智能在其运营中的渗透。尽管对于流动性提供者来说,人工智能的使用可能非常不同,但不容忽视。

Kapsos在谈到流动性提供商对人工智能的使用时说:“我们只是使用了其中的一小部分。我们如何使用它显然是从质量方面。它帮助我们识别事物、分析事物,并通过正确的方式分析从各地检索的数据。我想说,它再次帮助我们进行预测分析。使用人工智能,我们可以在需要时以最佳方式提供流动性。”

“此外,人工智能帮助我们知道需求在哪里,何时出现,以及如何出现。因此,尽管这是一个开始,但我们已经在使用人工智能并将其应用于我们的业务中。”

“进入壁垒很高”

Kapsos强调了流动性的下一个趋势,他说:“我确实看到了整合。”

“你经常看到合并。为了经营一个非常好的流动性业务,你需要让很多组件同时正常工作。所以我相信很多人会犯错误,他们甚至无法满足和改进这些组件,这样他们才能生存下去。”

“然而,如果新来者以正确的方式来,他们总是有市场的……但是,由于标准很高,进入门槛也很高。现在人们知道他们想要什么。交易员和经纪人变得更加老练。因此,进入这个市场是一个挑战。”

İlgili Okumalar

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit7 dk önce

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit7 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit21 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit21 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

This summer, the mathematics community was shaken as OpenAI's Astra model reportedly solved 10 long-standing open problems, and Claude Fable 5 found a potential counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. This was followed by a major shift in physics: renowned physicist Gavin E. Crooks presented an open problem in stochastic thermodynamics to Claude, which the AI solved completely in days—a task that might take a skilled graduate student months. The problem concerned constraints on entropy production statistics under the Detailed Fluctuation Theorem (DFT), a core concept in non-equilibrium physics. Claude provided a unifying geometric answer: all possible DFT-compatible distributions correspond to a convex "moment body." Its key insight was that for a fixed "gap," the distribution is uniquely determined, making any general DFT distribution a mixture of these basic two-outcome distributions. This structure implies that for given lower-order moments, the nth moment only has a sharp lower bound, with no upper bound. Claude demonstrated that numerous previously published bounds on entropy production are merely low-dimensional projections or "shadows" of this single, unified convex body. The AI-authored paper offers a complete hierarchical characterization of the moment constraints. This case signifies a potential paradigm shift: AI is progressing from solving known problems to aiding in the exploration of fundamental, unsolved scientific questions, heralding an AI-accelerated era for physics.

marsbit21 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

marsbit21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片