ETHCC五大关键点总结

币界网2024-07-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-23 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

作者:0xWendy,IOSG Ventures 来源:X,@0xWendy99

1. Infra和应用之间投资的不平衡

无论是V神的发言还是现场的交流,多数一级投资人都意识到了基础设施和应用之间的不平衡,更多的兴趣开始转移到消费者应用上。Paradigm也筹集了新资金用于消费者方向的投资,但现场关于消费者应用的想象力仍然局限,多局限于类似于 pump.fun 的仿盘和 tgbot 产品。链上交易走向更加丝滑和繁荣是大势所趋,pump 和 tgbot 是较为成功的初步形态,后续可能会有其他形式的产品出现。

2. 热门叙事:自上而下AI最热,自下而上meme最热

多家头部VC的投资人仍然看好AI,基本逻辑是 LLM 这波革新带来了生产力提高的巨大潜力,而加密货币可以很好地提供训练激励以及解决很多AI模型初期营收困局。融资八千五百万美元的顶流AI局 Sentient 举办的 Open AGI 峰会也十分热闹,从 AI infra 到 agent 应用商店几乎都有 web3 项目在做,但普遍泡沫较高,一级市场估值过亿的项目也有很多。

Solana 引发的 meme 热潮和造福效应使得社区对这一方向也有较多探索,机构和项目方也逐渐产生兴趣,但都处于草根和初期状态,TON 以及其他非主流公链也有部分应用在 build,但多数质量不佳。

3. 高性能公链:宏大叙事与新旧更替

这轮牛市中几个高额融资的并行 EVM 或高性能公链自然成为了新星,如 Monad、Megaeth、Bera 等都是热门项目,即使主网甚至测试网未上线也吸引了很多关注。Base 并没有注重线下活动,链上生态反而发展得很好,成为最有潜力的土壤之一。而上一轮中的几个号称高性能公链的生态寂静,专场人烟稀少,也很难吸引用户和开发者的兴趣。这说明在生态初期的 timing 和 vibe 基调的重要性。

4. DeFi 和 NFT 很难引起新的兴趣和融资

活动中个人感觉 DeFi 项目方并不多,活动也很少见到 DeFi 主题,NFT 似乎更成为了罕被提及的名词。除了少数由头部VC领投的新生态中的 DEX perp 和几个成熟项目,新兴 DeFi 项目很难在短时间内建立用户信任的护城河。

5. 行业逐渐成熟,马太效应越发显著

如果用更加直白的语言描述,那就是部分加密新钱已经在过去两到三轮周期变成了“老钱”,从投资机构到项目方核心圈抱团越发明显,很多机构出手策略不再是广撒网,而是重仓培养,并且顶端的 key person 掌握了让市场相信其叙事的能力。对机构来说,只能选择参与进核心圈或者有自己创造叙事的能力;对项目方来说,更光鲜的背书和强大的资源才能拿到融资,或者另一条路是找到市场能产生利润的 PMF,比如 Pump 的类交易所模式。

总结

总体来说,加密仍然是最好的行业之一。应用层的探索,基建性能的提高,更合规和广泛的接纳,逆全球化趋势下无可比拟的流通优势,无需怀疑是否是牛市,只需要一点时间和信心。

İlgili Okumalar

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit7 dk önce

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit7 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit21 dk önce

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit21 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

This summer, the mathematics community was shaken as OpenAI's Astra model reportedly solved 10 long-standing open problems, and Claude Fable 5 found a potential counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. This was followed by a major shift in physics: renowned physicist Gavin E. Crooks presented an open problem in stochastic thermodynamics to Claude, which the AI solved completely in days—a task that might take a skilled graduate student months. The problem concerned constraints on entropy production statistics under the Detailed Fluctuation Theorem (DFT), a core concept in non-equilibrium physics. Claude provided a unifying geometric answer: all possible DFT-compatible distributions correspond to a convex "moment body." Its key insight was that for a fixed "gap," the distribution is uniquely determined, making any general DFT distribution a mixture of these basic two-outcome distributions. This structure implies that for given lower-order moments, the nth moment only has a sharp lower bound, with no upper bound. Claude demonstrated that numerous previously published bounds on entropy production are merely low-dimensional projections or "shadows" of this single, unified convex body. The AI-authored paper offers a complete hierarchical characterization of the moment constraints. This case signifies a potential paradigm shift: AI is progressing from solving known problems to aiding in the exploration of fundamental, unsolved scientific questions, heralding an AI-accelerated era for physics.

marsbit21 dk önce

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

marsbit21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片