“加密货币对国家有利”?中国在加密货币领域相当先进?美国希望在中国之前掌控加密货币?

币界网2024-07-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-18 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

近期,前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在接受专访时,重申了对加密货币的支持,并暗示即将推出第四个NFT(非同质化代币)系列。特朗普表示,他想确保美国在加密货币行业保持领先地位,因为这是一个"婴儿"行业,他不想让其他国家(特别是中国),在这个领域占据主导地位。

图片

关于第四个NFT系列,特朗普解释称"人们希望我这样做,市场有很大的需求"。他的上一个NFT系列"Mug Shot"是围绕他正在进行的刑事指控而设计的,原本计划用一年的时间来销售,但结果显示,仅在一天内就售罄了。

值得注意的是,收益的80%是用加密货币支付的。特朗普表示,这让他大开眼界,也让他认识到了加密货币的力量和潜力。他直接且深刻地意识到加密货币对国家有利,美国必须掌控这个领域。加密货币行业现在还是个刚刚起步的“婴儿”,他担心如果美国不重视,中国将主导这一领域。

图片

特朗普指出,中国在加密货币行业已经相当先进了。如果美国一直忽视加密货币,不采取积极行动,中国可能就会成为这个领域的主导者,而且就算不是中国,也可能是其他国家。美国如果不能领导加密货币行业,将是一个巨大的损失。

因此,特朗普的态度一百八十度大转弯,现在一直积极支持加密货币。特朗普强调,加密货币不会消失,它太神奇了,美国必须在中国之前掌控加密货币领域。加密货币为美国带来了机遇,但如果其他国家在这个领域领先,美国就可能失去主导地位,他不想对另一个国家接管这个领域负责。

图片

特朗普的观点引发了人们对美国未来加密货币政策的广泛讨论。作为当前政治舞台上的一个重要角色,他的言论无疑会对该行业的发展产生一定影响。有分析人士认为,他可能会在后续选举中提出更具体的加密货币计划,以吸引年轻选民的支持。

随着中国在区块链和数字货币方面的持续投入和进展,美国政府也越来越关注加密货币领域,试图确保自身在这一新兴技术领域的主导地位。特朗普的表态无疑为这一目标增添了新的动力。

图片

此外值得一提的是,企业家兼投资者马克·库班(Mark Cuban)最近推测,地缘政治不稳定和通胀压力可能会推动比特币成为全球储备资产。这位亿万富翁表示,美国的地缘政治角色受到质疑,随着前总统承诺的未来减税措施的出台,通胀压力可能会加剧。加上硅谷对前总统特朗普的支持增加可能意味着大型科技行业将“涉足比特币”。

全球范围内,政府腐败和失控的通货膨胀造成的经济困境,导致越来越多的人转向加密货币寻求救济。现在,各国民众正以与人口不成比例的速度接受加密货币。毕竟,与传统的法定汇款服务相比,加密汇款数量的增长反映了其较低的交易成本和近乎即时的完成时间。

图片

总的来说,特朗普认为加密货币对美国来说是一个机遇。他呼吁美国政府采取行动,并且自己正在行动,确保美国在这一新兴市场上保持领导地位,防止中国取代美国成为加密货币领域的主导者。这凸显了加密货币对国家经济和地缘政治影响力的重要性正在日益增加。

İlgili Okumalar

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit22 dk önce

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit22 dk önce

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit28 dk önce

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit28 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片