FTX赔付在即,一文梳理债权人需要关注的重点信息

Odaily星球日报2024-07-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

8月中旬前须选择索赔程序,索赔低于5万美元的债权人可获一次性还款。

原文作者:Nancy,PANews

FTX 赔付在即的 160 亿美元的巨额资金被认为是提振加密行情的重要买盘力量。近期,FTX 重组计划已进入投票阶段,本文 PANews 整理了赔付关键节点、索赔对象和赔偿方案等债权人关注的重点信息。

投票窗口将于 8 月 17 日关闭,可选择巴哈马或美国索赔

近日,FTX 无担保债权人官方委员会 (UCC) 在 X 平台发文称,FTX 债务人正通过 Kroll 公司向客户和债权人发送征求意见和选票,以便就客户索赔计划进行投票。本次投票计划截止日期为北京时间 8 月 17 日 05: 00 ,投票结果将在听证会前 7 天公布,确认计划听证会的拟定日期则为北京时间 10 月 7 日 23: 00 。

这些债权人主要分为三种类型,分别是“有投票权”、“无投票权但视为接受计划”以及“无投票权但视为拒绝计划”。具体而言,持有 FTT 以外的法币或加密货币的用户将有权投票,仅持有 FTT/NFT 则被视为拒绝该计划且无权投票等。且根据债券类型将根据赔偿实体、金额和类型进行不同划分,大部分为 Class 5 A、Class 7 A 以及 Class 13-18 类别。

其中,Class 5 A 为索赔价值超过 5 万美元的 FTX.com 客户;Class 7 A 为索赔价值低于 5 万美元的 FTX.com 客户;Class 13-18 则无法获得任何索赔且无权参与投票,包括股权权益、FTT 和小额索赔持有者。

5 A 类和 7 A 类 FTX.com 客户均可选择将索赔交由 FTX DM 在巴哈马清算程序或是通过美国进行索赔,但用户只能从其中一个程序中获得赔偿,且决定不可撤销或是更改。无论债权人选择哪种程序进行索赔,都将在同一时间获得大致相同的回报,前提是计划有效且满足所有客户 KYC、AML 和税务报告要求。

但两种赔付流程各有优势,比如美国不支持的 FTT/小额索赔持有或可在巴哈马流程中获得索赔,John Ray 在美国主导的清算重组案则控制着 FTX 大部分资产,赔付可能性更高。

另外,在税收方面,非美债权人将不受美国 30% 的预扣税影响。据文件披露,由国际债权人组成的非美国客户特设委员会已代表全球超 31 个国家,拥有超过 60 名成员。截至 2024 年 6 月 28 日,该委员会合计持有约 45 亿美元的 Dotcom 客户(使用 FTX.com 交易所的客户)权益索赔。

7 A 类债权人可获一次性赔付,更倾向稳定币支付

若破产保护计划获得批准,所有 FTX.com 客户预计都将获得全额付款,预计每美元能收到 119 到 143 美分索赔,以及从申请日起至适用分配日止,按 9% 的共识利率计算的未付索赔的后申请利息。根据 FTX 联合正式清算人普华永道发布的索赔用户指南显示,首次中期股息分配预计将于 2024 年末或 2025 年初支付。

其中, 7 A 类索赔为 119% ,预计将在 60 天内获得一次性赔付,这部分债权人数量占比达 98% ;5 A 类索赔追偿额预计在 129% 至 143% 之间,但是全额赔付以及支付申请利息后,通过补充减免基金的分配获得剩余价值,预计将由本应付给高级次级政府债权持有人的回收款提供资金。从规则来看,相比 7 A 类, 5 A 类的赔付将按照多阶段进行,且具体时间并未清晰,但他们也可通过同意将索赔金额减至 5 万美元以下来获得便捷索赔。

而受偿顺序对债权人利益也至关重要。此前,美国国税局 IRS 就因债权人的反对,将 8.85 亿美元的索赔金额中的 6.85 亿美元推至客户获得全额偿付后支付。近期,FTX 则与美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)达成和解, 40 亿美元的索赔排在债权人和利息之后,支付给 CFTC 的款项将转入补充减免基金,用于补偿受到严重损害的加密货币持有者(只有在资金充足的情况下才支付)。

且在赔偿形式上,此前 FTX 债权人称现金偿付将导致客户需要为收到的现金纳税,更希望以稳定币而非现金的形式获得分配。对此,UCC 表示,委员会将敦促债务人将向尽可能多的债权人提供稳定币选项。

UCC 认为,虽然重组计划并非完美,但已是为债权人实现最大化赔偿额的最佳方案。如果因债权人反对导致第十一章重组被转为第七章清算程序,那么将面临追偿额降低、赔偿时间延长以及诉讼成本增加,因此委员会鼓励债权人投票赞成该计划。

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit16 dk önce

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit16 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit20 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit20 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit21 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片