生态数据逆跌:TON做对了什么

金色财经2024-07-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-15 tarihinde güncellendi

最近,投资者们被大饼二饼价格的波动时刻牵动着心弦。加密市场情绪受到德国政府连续抛售BTC与Mt.Gox回归并宣布还款计划等信息的影响,由正面转为负面,并带来了一系列负面的多米诺效应。散户市场大小玩家们也是要么在观望,要么在抛售的路上,BTC价格从6月初的$71000一路跌至本周最低点$54000左右(数据来源:CoinGecko)。

LSHj0JWu0oSFZqp3kWvRaGbe0xdyH0hKJXFjLuQ3.png

然而在大盘走势持续下跌的近一个月中,据DefiLlama数据显示,却有一个生态不仅锁仓量没减,反增4亿美元,币价也上涨近10%(截至本文撰写时间)。引起了业内诸多资本和研究者的格外关注,这也就是我们今天要讨论的主角:TON(The Open Network)。

dTDMLrZ6satU8cNPRlG8PRrKiEp18hpuuFEuojSi.png

TON链,绝对是近期行业内讨论热度最高的话题之一。截至本文撰写时间,TON链治理代币Toncoin($TON)总市值达$184.2亿,在加密货币市场总排名第八。$TON币价也从今年3月的$2.5持续上涨近三倍至$7.4(数据来源:CoinMarketCap)。3月至今TON链发生了什么?他的团队构成是什么?资金状况是什么?在发展路径和愿景上和其他区块链的相似点和不同点是什么?我们一起来探探究竟。

 

一、TON团队构成与背景

TON是由Telegram Messenger的创始人Pavel和Nikolai Durov于2018年创立,设立初衷是为探索一个适用于Telegram亿级用户的区块链解决方案,同一年就通过出售代币筹集了17亿美元。在TON上线两个测试网络、完成代码开源,吸引来行业用户目光的同时,也引来了美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的关注。SEC指控Telegram进行未经注册的证券发行,在SEC的强势指控进攻下,最终Telegram团队向其支付了1850万美元和解金,并暂停了TON的研发工作。

zI7I5HmUgzyjW6LB4c8GHrf0Mm7MAfQaYGhORhr7.jpeg

直至2020年,一支开源技术团队NewTON在深入研究其原始开源代码库及资料后,依据源代码继续开展了研发工作,保持测试网络二的平稳运行,并将其改名为Mainnet。与此同时,社区成立了TON基金会,持续推进TON的工作至今。在小编看来,不论是NewTON还是TON基金会,都是Telegram在推进链上技术及产品发展的规避风险之策,TON始终都属于Telegram的子体系。也因此:

1. TON的发展起点与其他Layer1公链不同,它的背后有着9亿Web2用户流量的支持。

2. 在区块链技术设计上,TON区块链是以主链(Masterchain)、工作链(Workingchains)、分片链(Shardchains)相结合的方式运作,至于这些链之间的工作关系,技术小伙伴可以深入研究,本文不做赘述。在这种方式运行下,TON可实现每秒百万级以上的用户交易事件,大大提升了链上交互效率。

3. TON在壮大生态的过程中,Telegram为其提供了天然的应用场景和社交价值网络,有更加用户友好的产品体验。尽管用户处于其习以为常的中心化产品中,也能无痛跨越至Web3体验新业态。用户不用再费心费力的理解NFT是什么、元宇宙是什么、DID是什么、以及它们背后蕴含着什么样代表技术迭代的跨时代意义,用户只管尽情使用产品,体验新功能带来的乐趣即可。

 

二、TON生态应用概述与变现逻辑

据TON APP显示,现如今生态内已有938个APP,分为19个不同类型,包括CEX、DEX、质押、钱包、浏览器、跨链桥、工具、频道、NFT、市场分析工具、社群聊天、社交、赌博、加密货币、游戏、VPN、研发工具、电商、Launchpad。

其中,在GameFi赛道中,Notcoin点击赚币游戏与Catizen元宇宙游戏为这两个季度的大爆发贡献了大部分力量。然而值得一提的是,这类项目与以往Web3项目发展路径不同,他们都未在用户量激增前披露过多的融资信息,仅凭简单易上手的用户产品体验和病毒营销便成功出圈。用户还没来得及关注到项目TVL、FDV、持币地址数等等资产数据信息,就已经开始沉浸式点击和升级小猫,并分享给其他用户。这样流量为主要动能的发展路线,也是TON生态产品的一大特点。也正因为强流量特性与弱数字资产特性,虽然TON处于公链TVL排名的前十、研究讨论热度持续不下,却在Q2仅有不到10个项目获得了资本投资,且绝大多数集中在DeFi类型(数据来源:RootData)。

 

没有了资本的支持,是否意味着这类流量项目就只能昙花一现,不会长久呢?没有资本,拥有流量的创作者们也可以自己创造收益,TON给出了自己的解决方案 - Adsgram,是于今年发布的流量变现工具。不同于Telegram原生广告平台,Adsgram允许开发者在Mini APP或者Bot中投放多种类型的广告赚取 $TON。

conPo6VXb8gtNyiJV9KzXYQE20OgKUoaeIgH8W9W.png

根据Adsgram官方频道上的一份报告显示,截至2024年5月,该平台网络每天的曝光量已经达到了800万次。上线之初,该网络以Gamee、Fonton Fantasy Football等小应用为特色,大部分流量来自尼日利亚、孟加拉国、德国等国家。开发者通过Adsgram最高可获得$16的千次展示费用。

 

三、隐私安全与流量诱惑

在广告推送的产品逻辑中,一般是平台依据用户行为采集数据、通过数据为用户打标签、再为标签用户投送相关广告,以达到精准投放的产品目标。TON确实是为生态创作者们提供了新的变现思路,为用户带来的优质的产品体验。但是,这样的广告平台是否与一向推崇去中心化、隐私性、安全性的Web3用户价值取向形成冲突呢?

 

行业内一直流传着一个区块链不可能三角,即区块链三大难题:去中心化、安全性、可拓展性。基于当前的技术,我们很难在一个系统中同时实现这三个要素。那么,拥有去中心化和可拓展性的TON,在流量面前,未来是否持续选择牺牲安全性,又或者可以提供更加符合Web3价值观的安全性解决方案?CyberDAO将继续关注。

 yXmgymvJdZKKFhWS1fQVHMIozjjyhVETJC4dia7S.png

CyberDAO是推动Web3行业发展的投研孵化DAO组织,2021年创立与新加坡,同年获得由Musically联合创始人朱骏(Alex Zhu)领投的2000万美元A轮融资。发展至今,已有超过2000名DAO成员,包含技术、资本、品牌等来自多元领域的建设者,是中文区最大规模的DAO组织之一。CyberDAO将不定期产出行业研究报告。敬请关注!

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit13 dk önce

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit13 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit17 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit17 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit18 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit18 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片