防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

Odaily星球日报2024-07-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-07-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

只有在进行客观的市场情绪分析时,才应考虑大众的行为。

原文作者:Koroush AK

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

你最大的交易错误不是技术性的,而是心理性的失误,这些偏见摧毁了无数交易者。

不惜一切代价避免以下几点:

1.锚定偏差(Anchoring Bias)

  • 交易者专注于一个价格(锚),这可能会影响他们的决策。

  • 如果交易者 A 在 BTC 价格为 52, 000 美元时加入加密货币,那么 61, 000 美元的 BTC 似乎很昂贵。

  • 如果交易者 B 在 BTC 价格为 71, 000 美元时加入加密货币,那么 61, 000 美元的 BTC 似乎很便宜。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

2.近期偏差(Recency Bias)

这是对最新信息的记忆最深刻并重视这些信息的倾向。

交易者可能会将最近交易中的信息带到下一笔交易中,这可能导致过度自信和损失。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

3.厌恶损失(Loss Aversion)

交易员对损失的感受比对收益的感受更强烈。

损失 100 美元的痛苦可能大于赚 100 美元的快乐。

这种偏见可能导致交易员过早放弃获利,因为他们担心这些收益会变成损失。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

4.禀赋效应(Endowment Effect)

当交易者持有某项资产时,他们往往会高估其价值。

这种情感上的依附使得他们难以在亏损时出售,甚至难以按公平价格出售,因为他们更多地依赖自己的期望,而非市场实际情况来判断资产的未来价格。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

5.从众心理(Herd Mentality)

无论是盲目跟随大众还是刻意反其道而行之,都存在风险。

要坚持自己的交易计划,避免因大众的行为而冲动行事。

只有在进行客观的市场情绪分析时,才应考虑大众的行为。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

6.可得性启发(Availability Heuristic)

交易者往往对情感上最强烈或最近发生的信息给予过多的重视。

例如,即便市场状况已经改变,但近期的市场崩盘可能会让交易者过于谨慎。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

7.幸存者偏差(Survivorship Bias)

系统性地高估成功的概率。

我们常看到的是成功的故事,而失败的故事往往被遗忘。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

8.框架效应(Framing Effect)

信息的呈现方式会影响决策。

交易者的情绪和自信心会影响他们的风险评估。

积极的情绪可能导致低估风险,而消极的情绪可能导致高估风险。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

9.确认偏差(Confirmation Bias)

交易者倾向于寻找支持其信念的数据。

如果你看好某项资产,你会寻找所有支持该资产看涨的信息,而忽略看跌的数据。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

10.事后诸葛亮(Captain Hindsight)

事后看来,一切都显而易见。

事件发生后,交易者常常觉得自己早已预见了结果。

这种偏见会导致对未来预测的过度自信,并对自己的交易能力产生不切实际的期望。

防亏钱指南:需要克服的10大心理偏见

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit12 dk önce

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit12 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit17 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit17 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit17 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit17 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片