大的真要来了,速览zkSync空投规则与分配详情

Odaily星球日报2024-06-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-06-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

单个地址低保450个,最多空投10万枚代币。

编译:Karen,Foresight News

备受瞩目的 zkSync 空投分配计划已尘埃落定。zkSync 协会将于下周向 zkSync 的早期用户和采用者进行一次性 36 亿枚 ZK 代币空投,符合条件的钱包有 695, 232 个。快照时间为 3 月 24 日,社区成员可以在 Claim.zknation.io 网站检查空投资格,并可从下周开始直到 2025 年 1 月 3 日认领空投。

此次空投占 ZK 代币总供应量的 17.5% 。用户将能够从下周开始直到 2025 年 1 月 3 日领取他们的代币。从 6 月 24 日起,贡献者即可领取。

谁有资格获得 zkSync 空投?

两类 zkSync 用户有资格获得共 17.5% 的空投资格:

1、用户(89% ):在 zkSync 上进行交易并达到活动阈值的 zkSync 用户。

2、贡献者 ( 11% ):通过开发、宣传或教育为 zkSync 生态系统和协议做出贡献的个人、开发者、研究人员、社区和公司(与在 zkSync 上的活动无关)。

空投的资格和分配基于 2024 年 3 月 24 日 UTC 时间 00: 00 进行的 zkSync Era 和 zkSync Lite 活动快照,以纪念 zkSync Era 主网启动一周年。

zkSync 空投如何分配?

资格:zkSync 根据资格标准检查了在 zkSyncc Era 和 zkSync Lite 上进行过交易的每个地址,以识别那些认真花时间探索 zkSync 的真实用户。每个地址必须至少有一个积分才有资格获得空投。

分配:在确定钱包的资格后,根据跨链到 zkSync Era 的加密资产来计算空投分配。该公式根据地址在 zkSync Era 的资产(钱包中和 DeFi 中)以及这些资产在 zkSync 时代的存在时间来调整地址的分配。获得的积分越多,最终分配的金额就越大,单个地址空投上限为 10 万枚 ZK。

乘数:每个地址都可以根据表明真实人类行为或对 zkSync 贡献的可能性很高的活动获得乘数。这些乘数适用于 zkSync Era 和 Lite 使用的资格和分配。

  • 拥有 zkSync 原生 NFT;

  • 通过持有 zkSync 原生 ERC 20 代币支持 zkSync 生态系统;

  • 使用智能合约钱包试验 zkSync Era 的原生账户抽象;

  • 接收并持有之前来自其他 ETH 社区的空投;

  • 与主流 ETH 主网智能合约进行交易并探索新的用例和 DApp。

满足如上「资格」、「分配」和「成熟」的每个地址都被授予了代币分配。单个地址必须满足 450 ZK 的最低要求,空投上限为 10 万枚 ZK。少于 450 ZK 的地址的代币将被回收回池中。

女巫检测:此次空投旨在奖励「真正的用户」。绝大多数女巫地址已经通过资格和分配标准被淘汰。每个钱包都经过额外的女巫检测步骤。zkSync 表示,zkSync Era 上的独立地址超过 600 万个,ZK 空投专注于使用以人为本的方法来识别真实用户。钱包的链上历史揭示了很多有关其所有者习惯的信息。真正的人往往愿意冒险,尤其是那些感觉自己是社区一部分的人。他们花时间在链上,ape in、交易、尝试新协议并持有投机资产。真实用户连接的资产最终会流入 DApp 和 DeFi 协议,成为高流动性生态系统的命脉。用户应根据其对 zkSync 成功的影响按比例获得奖励。

大的真要来了,速览zkSync空投规则与分配详情

贡献者空投中,超过一半(5.8% )的分配包括基于 zkSync Era 的 zkSync 原生项目的金库,包括 DeFi 协议、ZK 链、NFT 集合、去中心化市场、基础设施、游戏等。剩余贡献者空投分配给为 ZKysnc 奠定基础的贡献者、公司和个人:

1、以太坊开发组织的贡献者,包括执行客户端、共识客户端、开发者工具、RPC 以及其他对 zkSync 产生积极影响的项目。

2、拥有先进区块链技术并直接或间接为 zkSync 的成功做出贡献的 Github 仓库的贡献者,包括与区块链、零知识证明、开发者工具和开发者教育相关的重要工作。

3、为开发人员和安全研究人员提供培训的教育工作者,并为 GitHub 上的 zkSync 社区中心做出了贡献。

致力于零知识证明、以太坊开发工具、开源软件的 Github 存储库的贡献者。

4、参加 Cantina、Code 4 rena 和 CodeHawks 主办的审计竞赛的安全研究人员。

5、zkSync 社区 mods、ZK Credo 翻译者、ZK Quest 参与者以及现场活动参与者。

此外,总供应量的 0.4875% 被分配给一小群实验性链上社区,用于探索使用代币和 NFT 进行组织的新方法。这些社区包括 $DEGEN 和 $BONSAI 空投接收者、Crypto the Game 玩家以及 Pudgy 和 Milady 持有者。

zkSync 快照时间为 3 月 24 日,社区成员可以在 Claim.zknation.io 网站检查空投资格,并可从下周开始直到 2025 年 1 月 3 日认领空投。符合条件的 GitHub 开发者和 zkSync GitHub Discussion Helpers 必须在 6 月 25 日之前将他们的地址与其帐户关联起来。外部项目、Protocol Guild 和 zkSync 原生项目贡献者将能够从 2024 年 6 月 24 日开始领取。

zkSync 代币如何分配?

ZK 代币总供应量为 210 亿枚代币,除空投外,社区分配占比 66.7% ,生态系统激励占比 19.9% (由 zkSync 基金会分发),投资方分配 17.2% ,团队分配 16.1% ,Token Assembly 分配 29.3% 。分配给投资者和团队的代币在第一年将处于被锁定状态,然后在 2025 年 6 月至 2028 年 6 月之间的 3 年时间内解锁。

zkSync 表示,三分之二(约 67% )的 ZK 代币将分配给社区。其中,总供应量的 17.5% 将通过一次性空投进行分配,其余社区代币将随着时间的推移,通过 zkSync 基金会和 ZK Nation 治理流程管理的生态系统计划进行分配,以支持不断发展的生态系统。

大的真要来了,速览zkSync空投规则与分配详情

İlgili Okumalar

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

The article outlines the diverse and fragmented landscape of "World Models" in China's tech industry, where major players are pursuing similar goals under different names like world foundational models, physical AI, or integrated within autonomous driving and embodied intelligence systems. The core aim is to enable AI to create an internal, dynamic environment for simulation, reasoning, and learning, reducing reliance on infinite real-world data. This "data engine" allows for unlimited generation, experimentation, and iteration. The report categorizes the approaches of different companies: * **Internet Giants:** Alibaba is developing models for linguistic, virtual, and physical worlds (Qwen-AgentWorld, HappyOyster, Qwen-RobotWorld). Tencent's HY-World focuses on 3D, game, and social scenarios. ByteDance leverages its vast video data for a potential "digital twin" model. Huawei integrates its model into industrial applications like smart cars and robotics without separately branding it. Baidu embeds world model capabilities within its Apollo autonomous driving and Ernie systems. * **Automakers:** Companies like NIO, Li Auto, XPeng, and Geely are using world models as virtual "driving schools" and "testing grounds." They generate complex scenarios (e.g., rain, snow) to train and validate autonomous driving systems in simulation, aiming for more capable and safer AI drivers. * **Autonomous Driving Suppliers:** Firms such as Momenta, Horizon Robotics, Haomo.ai, and DeepRoute.ai are building the underlying "world engines." They focus on large-scale video generation for simulation, reinforcement learning, and enhancing end-to-end autonomous driving models, often integrating these capabilities into commercial products. While startups bring focus and innovation, they face challenges like limited data, compute resources, and deployment channels. Large companies possess these advantages and are rapidly transitioning world models from research projects into core business infrastructure powering products in vehicles, games, and industry. The conclusion is that world models represent an evolution and convergence of existing AI fields into crucial industrial infrastructure, moving the competition from simply building a model to effectively deploying it to understand and interact with the physical world.

marsbit5 dk önce

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

marsbit5 dk önce

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

The crypto industry has entered a "Show Me" era, where grand visions and white papers are no longer sufficient to gain traction. This shift is driven by increased skepticism, high-profile bad actors, and notably, the serious entry of traditional finance (TradFi) institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and JPMorgan Chase, which are launching real, scaled products such as tokenized funds and blockchain-based settlement. This raises the bar for what constitutes a credible project. The communication dynamic has fundamentally changed. The focus is no longer on "what you are building" but on "what you have built and who is using it." Startups must now provide a "proof stack": verifiable data like mainnet transaction volume and active wallets, genuine partnerships with signed contracts, and evidence of organic product-market fit from real users, not just investors. Announcements must be backed by concrete, chain-verifiable evidence. For communication strategies, this means leading with proven facts and hard data—even if modest—rather than speculative narratives. A compelling story must be grounded in demonstrated results. While vision remains important, the balance has inverted from 80% vision/20% substance to the opposite. This higher threshold ultimately benefits builders with genuine traction, filtering out noise and allowing their real signals to stand out clearly. The "Show Me" era is a permanent maturation, demanding that communication strategies prove value, not just promise it.

链捕手37 dk önce

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

链捕手37 dk önce

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, has reportedly formed a team to develop "Arena," a new application focused on prediction markets. Users would use platform points to place bets on outcomes in politics, sports, and global events. This move follows Meta's massive, nearly $900 billion, losses from its heavily-invested metaverse division, Reality Labs. The prediction market industry is already showing strong demand, with leading platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket facilitating hundreds of billions in annual volume. Meta, with its 3.56 billion daily active users across its apps, possesses the unprecedented scale to bring this niche activity to a mainstream audience, similar to its past success in cloning features like Stories and Reels. However, Arena faces significant hurdles. Meta plans to start with a points-based system to avoid strict financial regulations, but this may dilute the core incentive of accurate prediction that real-money markets provide. More critically, Meta enters the space with a major trust deficit stemming from its past regulatory battles, notably the failed Libra/Diem stablecoin project, and its controversial history with political content and misinformation. The prediction market sector itself is under increasing regulatory scrutiny, with recent CFTC actions including fines and the first-ever insider trading case. While Meta's vast user base offers a unique opportunity to expand the market, its success hinges on navigating complex regulations and rebuilding the credibility necessary for a platform dealing with sensitive topics like elections. The outcome could range from Meta dramatically growing the industry to Arena becoming a high-profile regulatory target before it can scale.

Foresight News54 dk önce

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Foresight News54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片