十问LayerZero联创:刷量交易如何处理、代币激励如何计算?

Odaily星球日报2024-06-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-06-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

交易额小于1美元和价值低于0.00001 ETH的NFT交易计算激励时权重降为20%,不影响其他正常交易的权重计算。根据付出的协议费用进行半线性分配。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

十问LayerZero联创:刷量交易如何处理、代币激励如何计算?

LayerZero 的女巫审查工作仍在如火如荼进行当中,据 LayerZero 联创 Bryan Pellegrino 此前公布,预计将在 6 月底前公布女巫地址最终名单。今日,Bryan 针对女巫攻击和低价值交易的审查和处理计算方式在X 平台进行了一一解答,Odaily星球日报以 QA 形式整理全文如下。

审查标准与最终目标

Bryan Pellegrino 在回答用户问题前,首先定义了什么是垃圾交易(Spam,本文称为低价值交易),以及如何处理和激励这些交易,其原文如下:

以下是我们目前从广泛的角度考虑资格的方式。重点显然是真实用户,以及最公平、最广泛分布的高度一致、最持久的用户。

很大程度上,这受到了女巫过程结果的启发,任何真正的最终定义都将直接来自 LayerZero,而不是我。

初始钱包为 600 万个, 300 万个钱包交易次数低于 5 次,那么这些钱包是要被认真考虑的。所有交易低于 1.00 美元的都降权(dweight) 80% ,但仍然以正常交易的 1/5 计算,所有“无价值 NFT”也是如此。

此处,无价值 NFT 定义是“市场价值”或“总交易量”小于 0.00001 ETH。例如 Gas drop 类型的交易也算作有效交易。

然后根据具体的协议费用(而不是交易所在的底层区块链的费用)对交易进行归一化处理。处理后的数据最低值即是资格标准,同时也有上限。最后将根据基于早期使用情况获得乘数。

总的来说:消除女巫、消除垃圾交易、有上限的半线性奖励、奖励早期用户、奖励持久用户、通过 RFP 奖励所有非标准协议交互如 LP 等。

(Odaily 注:RFP 是 LayerZero 推出的分配协议,允许每个项目根据其整体代币分配建立自己的分配标准。所有在主网上拥有 OApp、OFT 或 ONFT 合约的项目都有资格申请 RFP。)

QA 合辑

Bryan Pellegrino 针对部分细节问题进行了一一解答,其中重点部分整理如下:

流动性提供者激励

Q:流动性池很重要,他们应该得到奖励。如果有人添加 LP 超过一周它有 99% 的概率不是 Sybil。

A:(流动性提供者)的激励将由 RFP 负责。

无价值 NFT 界定和处理

Q:我去年 5 月在 Holograph 上创建了一个 nft,花了我 0.003 eth,如果算作一个没有价值的 NFT,显然它没有价格。但我喜欢我创建的 NFT,我是最早尝试使用 L0 跨链 NFT 的人之一。

A:这些交易是为了使用我们的跨链系统而发起的,如果很容易区分这一点和数以百万计的“无价值 NFT”交易,我很乐意这样做。

我希望 Holograph 在 RFP 中奖励创作者。这就是为什么我们制定了 RFP 流程。

(Odaily 注:该回答的意思是此类仍属于“低价值 NFT”,不在 LayerZero 官方的直接空投范围,最多通过 RFP 进行激励。)

Gas Drop 计算

Q:说实话,你集成了 50 多个链,但 90% 的 Refuel 费用低于 1 美元,每个 tx 的价值减少 80% ,你惩罚了很多用户。

A:我认为这是完全有效的批评,这也是我公开发表评论的部分原因。最初的帖子谈论的是 Stargate 和 OFT 传输,我们审查的每个女巫集群都有无数的 tx,从 0.001 美元到 0.25 美元。我对 Gas Drop 数据知道的不多,但我们必须评估。

(注:Gas Drop 即为 Gas refuel,通常为以低成本向其他账户补充 Gas 费用。本节的意思是 Gas Refuel 操作将纳入激励范围,但通常会折扣计算。)

折扣计算方法

Q:如果我有大约 130 个 Layerzero 交易,其中我有大约 10 个无价值 NFT 交易,那么是整个地址进行 80% 折扣计算,还是 10 个无价值交易部分打折。

A:只有那 10 笔交易,而不是全部

无价值 NFT 定义

A:快照时的市场价值或总交易额(lifetime traded value)

无价值 NFT 与高额协议费用并存时如何处理?

Q:如果我在无价值 NFT 转账上花费了费用,是否折扣计算?

例如我转移了 5 个无价值 NFT,并且我向协议支付了 50 美元的费用;我现在的费用是 10 美元吗?

A:无价值 NFT 是正常交易的 20% ,因此您可以认为 1 美元的费用现在在整个模型中价值 0.20 美元。

降权计算是什么意思?

Q:降权(dweight) 80% 是什么意思

A:正常交易花费 1 美元的费用价值为 1 ,如果您跨链来回发送 0.01 美元,那么每次交易计算为 0.01 × 20% 。

LayerZero 合约部署者如何激励?

A:部署了近 60, 000 个合约,这就是 RFP 的构建目的,也是 RFP 流程中存在 dev 剥离的原因。

(Odaily 注:意味必须通过 RFP 申请才能获得激励。)

协议费用含义

Q:如果你通过 stargate 桥接 STG,就没有协议费用?

A:没有 Stargate 协议费用,但有 LayerZero 协议费用(对于 DVN 和执行者)。这就是费用的含义,而不是 Stargate 或其他应用程序的费用。

交易量如何考量?

Q:交易量不是前面所有讨论的一个重要部分吗?为何移除?

A:交易量是 Stargate RFP 或 OFT 的标准,但从 LayerZero 的角度来看,所有消息或多或少都是平等的。这就是为什么发送 100 美元或 100, 000, 000 美元的 OFT 费用完全相同

Q:想想看,如果我们对 100 美元和 100, 000, 000 美元的转账赋予相同的价值,那么即使是 0.000001 美元的转账也应该具有相同的权重,因为“所有消息或多或少都是平等的”。

A:是的,在平等使用的理想世界中,这是不需要的,特别是有大量 0.001 - 0.20 美元类型的低价值交易只是在原地打转,还有大量只是为了生成 tx 的无价值 NFT 交易。 我认为任何具有合理用途的东西都应该被视为正常的交易,任何“明显”无机的东西都应当减轻权重。

结论

一言蔽之,交易额小于 1 美元和价值低于 0.00001 ETH 的 NFT 交易将被视为低价值交易(Spam),计算激励时权重降为 20% ,但不影响其他正常交易的权重计算。最后根据付出的协议费用进行半线性分配(semi-linear with upper bound cap)。

此外,早期用户将获得额外激励,非标准 LayerZero 交易如提供流动性等将由 RFP 另行处理。

İlgili Okumalar

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

The article outlines the diverse and fragmented landscape of "World Models" in China's tech industry, where major players are pursuing similar goals under different names like world foundational models, physical AI, or integrated within autonomous driving and embodied intelligence systems. The core aim is to enable AI to create an internal, dynamic environment for simulation, reasoning, and learning, reducing reliance on infinite real-world data. This "data engine" allows for unlimited generation, experimentation, and iteration. The report categorizes the approaches of different companies: * **Internet Giants:** Alibaba is developing models for linguistic, virtual, and physical worlds (Qwen-AgentWorld, HappyOyster, Qwen-RobotWorld). Tencent's HY-World focuses on 3D, game, and social scenarios. ByteDance leverages its vast video data for a potential "digital twin" model. Huawei integrates its model into industrial applications like smart cars and robotics without separately branding it. Baidu embeds world model capabilities within its Apollo autonomous driving and Ernie systems. * **Automakers:** Companies like NIO, Li Auto, XPeng, and Geely are using world models as virtual "driving schools" and "testing grounds." They generate complex scenarios (e.g., rain, snow) to train and validate autonomous driving systems in simulation, aiming for more capable and safer AI drivers. * **Autonomous Driving Suppliers:** Firms such as Momenta, Horizon Robotics, Haomo.ai, and DeepRoute.ai are building the underlying "world engines." They focus on large-scale video generation for simulation, reinforcement learning, and enhancing end-to-end autonomous driving models, often integrating these capabilities into commercial products. While startups bring focus and innovation, they face challenges like limited data, compute resources, and deployment channels. Large companies possess these advantages and are rapidly transitioning world models from research projects into core business infrastructure powering products in vehicles, games, and industry. The conclusion is that world models represent an evolution and convergence of existing AI fields into crucial industrial infrastructure, moving the competition from simply building a model to effectively deploying it to understand and interact with the physical world.

marsbit5 dk önce

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

marsbit5 dk önce

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

The crypto industry has entered a "Show Me" era, where grand visions and white papers are no longer sufficient to gain traction. This shift is driven by increased skepticism, high-profile bad actors, and notably, the serious entry of traditional finance (TradFi) institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and JPMorgan Chase, which are launching real, scaled products such as tokenized funds and blockchain-based settlement. This raises the bar for what constitutes a credible project. The communication dynamic has fundamentally changed. The focus is no longer on "what you are building" but on "what you have built and who is using it." Startups must now provide a "proof stack": verifiable data like mainnet transaction volume and active wallets, genuine partnerships with signed contracts, and evidence of organic product-market fit from real users, not just investors. Announcements must be backed by concrete, chain-verifiable evidence. For communication strategies, this means leading with proven facts and hard data—even if modest—rather than speculative narratives. A compelling story must be grounded in demonstrated results. While vision remains important, the balance has inverted from 80% vision/20% substance to the opposite. This higher threshold ultimately benefits builders with genuine traction, filtering out noise and allowing their real signals to stand out clearly. The "Show Me" era is a permanent maturation, demanding that communication strategies prove value, not just promise it.

链捕手37 dk önce

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

链捕手37 dk önce

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, has reportedly formed a team to develop "Arena," a new application focused on prediction markets. Users would use platform points to place bets on outcomes in politics, sports, and global events. This move follows Meta's massive, nearly $900 billion, losses from its heavily-invested metaverse division, Reality Labs. The prediction market industry is already showing strong demand, with leading platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket facilitating hundreds of billions in annual volume. Meta, with its 3.56 billion daily active users across its apps, possesses the unprecedented scale to bring this niche activity to a mainstream audience, similar to its past success in cloning features like Stories and Reels. However, Arena faces significant hurdles. Meta plans to start with a points-based system to avoid strict financial regulations, but this may dilute the core incentive of accurate prediction that real-money markets provide. More critically, Meta enters the space with a major trust deficit stemming from its past regulatory battles, notably the failed Libra/Diem stablecoin project, and its controversial history with political content and misinformation. The prediction market sector itself is under increasing regulatory scrutiny, with recent CFTC actions including fines and the first-ever insider trading case. While Meta's vast user base offers a unique opportunity to expand the market, its success hinges on navigating complex regulations and rebuilding the credibility necessary for a platform dealing with sensitive topics like elections. The outcome could range from Meta dramatically growing the industry to Arena becoming a high-profile regulatory target before it can scale.

Foresight News54 dk önce

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Foresight News54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片