Glassnode:如何判定市场底部和入场时间?

Odaily星球日报2024-05-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-05-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Glassnode推出的28个新细分指标,通过深入分析短期持有者行为助力交易者在牛市中精准识别市场底部并优化交易策略。

原文标题:《Breakdown Metrics Applied: Identifying Local Bottoms in a Bull Market》

原文作者:Ukaria OC,CryptoVizArt,Glassnode

原文编译:LadyFinger, BlockBeats

编者按:

在数字资产市场的快速演变中,精准的数据分析已成为交易者把握市场脉搏的关键。Glassnode 最新推出的 28 项细分指标也标志着链上分析领域的一次重大飞跃。这些指标不仅提供了对短期持有者行为的深入洞察,还为交易者识别市场底部和优化交易策略提供了强有力的工具。

在链上分析领域的一项重要发展中,Glassnode 最近推出了一套 28 个新指标,旨在提供对数字资产市场更为细致的视角。你可以在此处阅读我们的原始公告以了解更多信息。

这些细致的指标可以改变交易员的游戏规则。它们提供了高度详细和直观的见解,可以转化为潜在的买卖信号。这些新指标的一个强大作用就是用来识别短期持有者中不同年龄组卖家的疲惫程度。

套用我们的新细分的指标,交易者现在可以更精确地确定未实现损失的严重性和止损时间,这通常标志着市场底部和牛市期间的潜在入市点。本报告详细探讨了这一框架,并在下面进行了总结,为旨在优化市场进入或 DCA 策略的交易者提供了可行的见解。

为什么关注短期持有者?

在链上分析的背景下,长期持有者(LTH)和短期持有者(STH)代表具有不同行为和市场影响的群体。短期持有者通常是新进入者或投机交易者,对价格变化更为敏感。在牛市期间,这些投资者往往都是损失最多的那部分人,这是因为他们更容易被市场波动影响而出售。这种现象使得对短期持有者的分析在用来识别市场底部的时候特别有价值。

对 STH 适用细分指标的好处

通过将短期持有者群体用年龄来进行细分后,我们帮助交易者更有效地确定卖方疲惫的时期。例如,我们可以观察到浮亏压力和投降事件是如何在短期持有者群体内,从最短的时间框架(1 天)开始,传播到更长的时间框架(1 周到 1 个月,甚至更长)。这种由内而外的进展提供了更清晰的潜在底部和市场将要逆转的信号。

Glassnode:如何判定市场底部和入场时间?

点击查看实时图表

换句话说,通过更细致的指标提供的见解,交易员可以检测到在不同短期时间框架中投降事件的交汇点,从而极大地增加了识别短期底部的可能性。

在牛市中识别当地底部的框架

为了识别卖方疲惫的状态,我们使用了一系列的关键指标,这些指标提供了对短期持有者群体内未实现和已实现损失的洞察。该框架由以下指标组成:

STH MVRV by Age:市场价值与已实现价值(MVRV)衡量资产的未实现利润或损失。当 MVRV 显著低于平均水平时,代表它持有者之间存在高度的未实现损失。这有助于检测卖方压力的早期迹象,因为重大的未实现损失通常先于短期持有者的实际出售活动。

Glassnode:如何判定市场底部和入场时间?

点击查看实时图表

STH SOPR by Age:花费成本利润率(Spent Output Profit Ratio,SOPR)提供了对 MVRV 中观察到的未实现财务压力是否被采取行动的洞察。SOPR Z 得分为负就表明短期持有者正在投降,以亏损的价格出售他们的资产并为加剧了卖方的压力。

Glassnode:如何判定市场底部和入场时间?

点击查看实时图表

STH Realized Loss by Age:这一指标评估了短期持有者已经实现的损失的幅度。高实现损失值证实了 MVRV 和 SOPR 指标所识别的卖方压力已经显现,通过量化已实现的损失幅度验证了卖方疲惫期间。

Glassnode:如何判定市场底部和入场时间?

点击查看实时图表

通过使用 Z-Scores,我们对这些指标进行标准化,从而更容易进行比较以及识别与平均值显著偏差的情况。Z-Scores 突出了极端行为的时期,使得在未实现和已实现损失异常高时更容易检测出来。这种标准化有助于确认真实的卖方疲惫时期,通过滤除噪音并专注于统计显著事件,为交易员提供更清晰的信号。

交易者的实际应用

使用 Glassnode 的新细分指标在牛市中识别卖方疲惫的点可以为交易者提供许多优势。以下是主要优点:

早期检测当地底部:通过确定短期持有者中严重的未实现损失和投降的时刻,交易者可以在市场底部变得明显之前识别它们,提供早期入市点的机会。

优化的美元平均成本(DCA)策略:了解卖方疲惫的时期允许交易者更有效地实施 DCA 策略,在市场底部以较低价格购买资产来降低平均购买成本。

增强的市场时机:通过观察卖方压力如何在短期持有者群体内从最短的时间框架传播到更长的时间范围,交易者可以更好地把握市场进入和退出的时机,从而实现利润最大化以及损失最小化。

战略灵活性:将短期持有者根据年龄组来细分允许交易者将此框架应用于各种交易策略,从日内交易到摆动交易到确保他们可以根据特定的市场条件调整他们的方法。通过利用我们新的细分指标提供的洞察,交易者可以在市场中获得竞争优势,做出更具战略性和盈利性的决策。

今天就开始利用 Glassnode 的细分指标来交易

目前,这些强大的细分指标仅在 Glassnode Enterprise 计划中提供。新指标、仪表板和文档的完整概述可在此处获得。

如果您是机构交易者或投资者,并希望利用这些指标在交易比特币和以太坊市场时获得更深层次的优势,请立即联系我们的机构销售团队

原文链接

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片