21Shares Secures Approval to Launch Spot Dogecoin ETF on Nasdaq

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

21Shares has received approval to launch a spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq under the ticker TDOG. This marks the third such ETF after Grayscale and Bitwise introduced similar products in November. The ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, with custody services provided by Coinbase, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo. At the time of writing, Dogecoin's price was trading at $0.136, down 2.06% from its intraday high, while daily trading volume surged over 150% to $1.23 billion. Technical indicators show a neutral RSI at 48 and a stabilizing MACD, with key support at $0.13–$0.125 and resistance near $0.145–$0.15.

21Shares has officially entered the spot Dogecoin ETF race, announcing its product with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. As it follows an automatic approval to list on the Nasdaq stock market under the ticker TDOG.

As per the 21Shares filing to the U.S. SEC, it has submitted its final prospectus to launch its Dogecoin ETF, which clearly shows the progress toward its launch this week.​

This ETF joins the expanding list of Dogecoin-focused investment instruments, which secures the third spot Dogecoin ETF to launch after Grayscale Dogecoin ETF (GDOG) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) launched in November. With that, the broadening ETF market could boost market interest and support price gains for DOGE.​

As the Exchange-Traded Funds are passive funds designed to track the price of Dogecoin alongside other cryptocurrencies, gaining mainstream investment exposure, while the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, where the custody services are provided by Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital Bank, and BitGo Bank & Trust.

DOGE Price Shows Mixed Signals

While the article is being written, Dogecoin price is trading at $0.136, down about 2.06% from its intraday high, which was around $0.14237. But the market interest was raised, as the daily trading volume increased by more than 150% to $1.23 billion, despite the increased trading activity surges, DOGE’s price movement is mixed.

​With that, analysing the 1-day chart of (DOGE/USDT), the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits near 48, sitting in the neutral territory, neither overbought nor oversold region, which puts it right in the middle ground, not showing any extreme buying or selling pressure.​

Meanwhile, the Moving Average Divergence and Convergence (MACD) is still in positive territory but has started to settle down. So, the immediate support is located between $0.13 and $0.125, while resistance remains near the $0.145–$0.15 range; a strong break above this is needed to confirm the next direction.

Highlighted Crypto News:

South Korea Plans to End Corporate Crypto Ban With 5% Equity Cap

Tags21sharesDogecoin ETFNASDAQ

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq?

AThe ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF is TDOG.

QWhich two companies had already launched a spot Dogecoin ETF before 21Shares?

AGrayscale and Bitwise had already launched spot Dogecoin ETFs (GDOG and BWOW) before 21Shares.

QWhat index is the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF designed to track?

AThe 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index.

QWhat was the approximate daily trading volume for Dogecoin mentioned in the article, and what was its percentage increase?

AThe daily trading volume for Dogecoin was approximately $1.23 billion, representing an increase of more than 150%.

QAccording to the technical analysis in the article, what is the key resistance level for DOGE's price?

AThe key resistance level for DOGE's price is near the $0.145–$0.15 range.

İlgili Okumalar

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

This article explores how the AI Agent paradigm is fundamentally transforming Web3 gaming, moving from a disruptive force to a core, legitimized element. It begins with the controversy in the competitive baking game Rugpull Bakery, where automated scripts caused fairness issues. Instead of banning them, the developers integrated AI Agents into the official gameplay by providing technical documentation (skill.md, agent.json), marking a shift towards "Agentic Gaming." The piece outlines three primary implementation models for AI Agents in Web3 games by 2026: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** AI Agents act as independent players with unique strategies. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, and Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data. The Somnia blockchain is highlighted as a dedicated "Agentic L1" infrastructure supporting this model at scale. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** This model, exemplified by EVE Frontier, allows AI Agents to program game world logic itself. Using "Smart Assemblies" (e.g., Smart Turrets, Smart Gates), Agents can modify shared economic and physical rules on-chain, creating dynamic, player/AI-built worlds. The ERC-8183 standard further enables these automated entities to hire other AI services for complex tasks. 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptation:** Here, AI serves as a collaborative partner. In Parallel Colony, highly autonomous AI Avatars work alongside human players who provide high-level guidance. Illuvium plans to use AI to make NPCs dynamic and responsive, creating personalized, emergent narratives for each player. The conclusion posits that Web3 gaming has reached a "post-human" inflection point. Blockchains' transparency and programmability, combined with new standards and infrastructure like Somnia, make integrating and governing AI Agents not just viable but essential. The future lies in a symbiotic digital order where players transition from manual laborers to commanders and partners of algorithmic intelligence.

marsbit10 dk önce

AI Agent Completely Transforms Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New 2026 Agent Paradigm

marsbit10 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

**Title: Saylor's Purchase of 1,550 Bitcoins Was a Bad Trade** The article critically analyzes Strategy's recent move of selling 32 bitcoins followed by a much larger purchase of 1,550 bitcoins. While appearing bullish, the author argues this trade is detrimental to MSTR shareholders. The core argument revolves around the concept of "breakeven modified Net Asset Value (mNAV)," a key metric for Strategy. To increase Bitcoin per share (BPS) for MSTR holders, Strategy must issue new shares at a premium high enough that the funds raised can buy more bitcoin than the bitcoin backing each existing share. Currently, this breakeven mNAV is estimated at 1.30. The recent trade failed on two counts: 1. The shares for the $181 million raise were issued at an mNAV *below* the 1.30 breakeven point. Selling "cheap" shares to buy bitcoin actually *reduces* BPS. 2. Only $101.3 million of the raised funds were used to buy bitcoin; the rest went to boost the company's dollar reserves. The breakeven mNAV calculation assumes *100%* of proceeds are used for bitcoin purchases. Diverting funds, even if mNAV were high, dilutes BPS. The result is an estimated 0.19% decrease in Bitcoin per share for MSTR holders. In exchange, Strategy merely extended its operational runway for its dollar reserves from ~6.3 months to 7 months. The author interprets this as Strategy prioritizing the survival and development of its STRC business over its stated core goal of increasing MSTR's BPS. This constitutes a gamble: if sacrificing MSTR value leads to improved market sentiment and a recovery in STRC's price (and thus mNAV), the whole system could work. If not, Strategy may be forced into a cycle of further diluting MSTR to stay afloat, potentially leading to deferred STRC dividends or corporate decline. The article concludes with a hope for price recovery for Bitcoin, MSTR, and STRC.

Foresight News21 dk önce

Saylor's Purchase of 1550 Bitcoin Is a Bad Trade

Foresight News21 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

After a severe two-day selloff in early June that erased over $1 trillion from U.S. chip stock market value, capital is flowing back first to the memory sector. The correction was not driven by a collapse in AI demand but rather a market reassessment of high expectations. Stocks like Broadcom faced selling pressure despite strong AI revenue guidance, signaling a shift in focus from who has an "AI story" to who can most rapidly translate AI demand into verifiable profits and earnings per share (EPS). Memory companies, such as Micron and SK Hynix, are leading the recovery because their EPS growth is more immediately verifiable. The AI server boom directly increases demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and high-capacity server DRAM, tightening supply and driving up contract prices for conventional DRAM and NAND Flash. This price increase, coupled with a shift to higher-margin products, flows directly into near-term revenue and profitability, as evidenced in recent earnings reports. In contrast, other AI semiconductor segments like GPUs, ASICs, and optical modules, while central to the long-term AI infrastructure story, face longer and less certain paths to EPS validation. Their growth depends more on future product cycles, customer adoption timelines, and capital expenditure plans. The rebound in memory stocks highlights a market preference for assets with shorter, more transparent EPS conversion cycles following the recent de-risking phase. However, this does not negate the potential of other AI hardware segments should they provide clearer near-term order visibility. The episode has raised the validation bar for all AI-related investments.

marsbit21 dk önce

The AI Bear Market Lasting Two Days Is Over; Why Did Funds Buy Back Storage Stocks First?

marsbit21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片