Crypto Market Maker GSR Recieves Singapore Crypto License

CoinDeskPolicy2024-04-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-04-04 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The license is the first awarded by Singapore to a crypto market maker.

  • The crypto market maker received in-principal approval from MAS in September.
  • GSR recently appointed a former JP Morgan executive to be its head of trading

Crypto market maker and liquidity provider GSR has been awarded a Major Payment Institution license by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

GSR now holds Singapore’s Digital Payment Token Service license, which authorizes firms to buy and sell “digital payment tokens,” which is what the government calls crypto and is also the license exchanges use.

The market maker first received in-principal approval from MAS in September.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Typically, liquidity providers and market makers are not licensed entities as they are not customer-facing entities. Recently, Singapore expanded the scope of its licensing regime to include custodial services and cross-border money transfers.

(Monetary Authority of Singapore)
(Monetary Authority of Singapore)

Earlier this year, the trading firm appointed a former JP Morgan executive, Andreas Koukorinis, as its new head of trading. Bloomberg first reported that GSR had been awarded a license.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

İlgili Okumalar

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit2 dk önce

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit2 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片