Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

Odaily星球日报2024-04-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-04-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

尽早交互,拒绝稀释。

原创|Odaily星球日报

作者|Azuma

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

4 月 2 日,生息型 Layer 2 网络 Blast 正式启动了“积分加成”活动。

根据 Blast 的官方披露,“积分加成”活动总计将涵盖 12 个任务板块,而当前暂时仅开放了“现货交易所”及“衍生品交易所”等两大板块,其余板块预计将在后续逐步开放。

当前阶段,用户可通过官网内的“加成倍数”主页处的 “现货交易所”及“衍生品交易所”板块交互指定项目,继而一次性获得大量积分,并激活后续的积分增长倍率加成 —— 以笔者当前 75 万的总积分以及 55/h 的增长速率为例,完成任一板块任务后继可一次性获得 14 万积分(约占总积分的 18.8% ),并将积分增长速度翻倍。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

  • 在“现货交易所”任务板块下,Blast 共计列出了五家指定项目,分别为 Ring Protocol、Ambient、Mangrove、Thruster Finance 以及 BladeSwap。

  • 在“衍生品交易所”任务板块下, Blast 共计列出了七家指定项目,分别为 BFX、SynFutures、Wasabi、Particle、DTX、Bloom 以及 Blitz。

根据 Blast 的说明,交互上述指定项目即可完成“积分加成”任务,具体的交互金额则未设限制,所以我们大可以用小额资金来逐一交互。此外经笔者实测,用户也无需交互所有指定项目,仅交互其中一家即可完成任务。

“现货交易所”中,以 Blast 生态最常用的 Thruster Finance 为例,只需在 ETH 和 USDB 之间小额互换一笔,即可完成任务要求。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

“衍生品交易所”中,我们则可以选择该生态主流交易所之一的 BFX,或是近期刚刚完成天使轮融资的 DTX 来进行交互。

以 BFX 为例,我们首先需要向该交易所账户内(其实是个新的合约地址)存入一定数额的资金,比如我们上一步从 Thruster Financ 处换取的 USDB。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

存款完成后,即可使用该资金进行合约开单,为了尽可能避免交互损耗,我们可以选择较低的杠杆倍率。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

之后,我们便可以在基于对市场走势的理解选择多、空方向的开单操作,之后关闭仓位即可,提出 USDB 即可。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

之后我们回到主任务界面来看,可以发现两项任务均已完成。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

值得一提的是,前文笔者提到过,以我个人 75 万的总积分以及 55/h 的增长速率为例,完成任一板块任务后继可一次性获得 14 万积分(约占总积分的 18.8% ),并将积分增长速度翻倍。

但实际完成两项任务后你会发现,一次性积分足足增长了约 42 万,而非 28 万(14 万乘以 2),这或许是因为 Blast 在计算第二项任务的积分奖励时,已将我们完成第一项任务后得到的积分计入了计算基础,但具体的算法暂时未知。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

此外,完成两项任务后的积分“总倍数”将变为 4 倍,这里不太清楚 Blast 在用“两轮 2 倍”来计算“总倍数”时用的究竟是乘法还是加法(乘法的话可就离大谱了…一共 12 轮呢),但无论如何,如果当前用户不去选择做交互任务,前期所积累的积分必会大幅稀释。

Blast开启“积分加成”活动,手把手带你完成任务

最后需要特别强调的一点是,考虑到 Blast 生态的安全性隐忧,本次“积分加成”活动支持用户使用非常用地址进行交互,但奖励仍会释放至常用地址内,具体操作为在主页内通过指定窗口链接其他非常用地址,并将所有地址纳入至同一账户内,继而共享奖励加成。

İlgili Okumalar

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News4 dk önce

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News4 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报8 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报8 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit16 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit16 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit30 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit30 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片