盘点近期值得关注的Solana生态空投项目

Odaily星球日报2024-04-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-04-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

目前TGE（代币生成事件）已明确的项目包括Wormhole、Zeus Network。

原文作者：S◎LF, 加密 KOL

原文编译：Felix, PANews

Solana 将在 4 月份获得前所未有的流动性。预计其生态项目的几轮空投，合计规模超 33 亿美元。以下为加密 KOL S◎LF 汇总的预计 4 月份空投的项目。

Parcl

  • PRCL 总供应量的 8% 将被空投

  • PRCL 可以在 Aevo 上以 1.87 美元的价格进行 OTC 交易

  • 以此价格为参考，约 1.5 亿美元的代币空投给数千人

  • TGE（代币生成事件）：待定

Wormhole

  • W 总供应量的 17% 将被空投

  • W 可以在 Aevo 上以 1.68 美元的价格进行 OTC 交易

  • 以此价格为参考，代币价值约为 28.5 亿美元

  • TGE： 4 月 3 日

Kamino

  • KMNO 总供应量的 7% 将被空投

  • 按照 15 亿美元的估值（作者预测），相当于向数千人空投约 1.05 亿美元

  • TGE：待定

Zeus Network

  • ZEUS 总供应量的 5% 将被空投

  • 作者的价格预测是 0.2 美元

  • 以此价格为参考，空投规模约为 1000 万美元

  • TGE： 4 月 4 日

io.net

目前还没有关于 io.net 的代币经济学的信息，但作者认为就 R/R（风险回报率）而言，该代币是最有利可图的项目之一。下图为加密 KOL Aylo 关于 io.net 的空投规模和市值分析，值得参考和借鉴。

盘点近期值得关注的Solana生态空投项目

Tensor

目前还没有 TNSR 的信息，唯一披露的信息是：

Backpack 用户将根据 Backpack 交易量获得 TNSR 代币，快照日期为 4 月 6 日。

相关阅读：宣布发币后点燃社区热度，Tensor 能否成为 Solana 上的第一平台？

Drift Protocol

  • Drift Protocol 积分可在 Whales Market 平台上通过 OTC 购买， 1 积分 4.95 美元。

  • TGE：待定，预计 4 月

Zeta Markets

  • Z-score 积分可在 Whales Market 上以 0.005 美元的价格进行 OTC 交易

  • Z-Score 第 1 季和第 2 季的所有参与者均有资格获得 Z 代币空投

  • TGE：待定，预计 4 月

Grass

  • Grass 积分可在 Whales Market 进行 OTC 交易，价格为 0.002 美元

  • Grass 第三季也是最后一季，预计将在 15 天内完成

  • TGE：待定

大部分空投的 TGE 尚未公布，然而多数已经宣布其积分计划即将结束。大部分流动性预计将流向：

  • 模因币

  • NFT

  • 实用代币

此外值得注意的是，在过去两年中， 4 月份一直是 NFT 的爆发期。Solana 生态分别于 2022 年和 2023 年诞生知名 NFT 项目 Okay Bears 和 Mad Lads。随着大量流动性进入 Solana 生态， 4 月份很可能会掀起新的 NFT 热潮。

原文链接

İlgili Okumalar

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News4 dk önce

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News4 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit15 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit15 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit29 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit29 dk önce

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

SpaceX's share price (SPCX) has fallen sharply, briefly dropping below its $150 IPO price in pre-market trading. The decline follows a catastrophic explosion during a Starship static fire test and was exacerbated by the company's announcement of a planned $20 billion bond issuance. This move, coming soon after its IPO raised $85.7 billion, raised concerns about SpaceX's cash burn rate and AI infrastructure spending surpassing expectations. The sell-off is also tied to a broader global pullback in AI-related stocks, with investors questioning the return on massive capital expenditures. Analysts note the initial IPO surge was largely driven by retail investor frenzy, which has now waned as sentiment turns cautious. With only about 5% of shares currently floating, the market is bracing for significant potential selling pressure when employee lock-up periods expire later this year. While some, like Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, remain long-term bullish on SpaceX's core ventures, other research firms argue the current stock price is driven by narrative rather than fundamentals and that future growth is already priced in. The next potential catalyst is the stock's possible inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index in July.

Odaily星球日报30 dk önce

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

Odaily星球日报30 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片