操作指南：如何安全地质押DYDX并赚取USDC

Odaily星球日报2024-03-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-03-06 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

dYdX Chain在上线不到2个月的时间内，已向超7,500名质押者发放了超200万枚USDC的质押奖励

原文来源：dYdX

原文编译：BlockBeats

在去中心化衍生品平台 dYdX 上，用户可以通过 Ledger 安全地质押 DYDX 并赚取 USDC。

质押 DYDX 并赚取 USDC

dYdX 链上的所有费用（吃单方（Taker）/挂单方（Maker）费用）均由验证者和质押者承担，主要以 USDC 形式分配。这创建了一种奖励机制，不会对原生代币造成通胀压力，并为验证者和利益相关者提供了实用性。

对于协议分配给质押者的任何质押奖励，验证节点都可以设置特定的佣金率，范围从最低 5% 到最高 100% ，并适用于每个验证节点的质押者。该佣金将从协议分配给这些质押者的质押奖励中扣除，并由相关验证人保留。目前，根据Minstcan 的数据，dYdX 链上的平均验证者佣金率为 6.08% 。

详情可参阅 dYdX 基金会关于质押 DYDX 的博客

截至 2024 年 1 月 12 日，质押 DYDX 的年利率从 9% 到 25% 不等。这是因为 dYdX Chain 收到的费用金额取决于当天的市场状况。

操作指南：如何安全地质押DYDX并赚取USDC

用户可以在此处查看到目前为止向质押者和验证者支付了多少奖励

  • 由于质押者以 USDC 形式获得奖励，因此不必担心 DYDX 的波动性。

  • 由于 dYdX 交易费用是质押奖励的来源，因此质押者不必担心 DYDX 代币的通货膨胀。

DYDX 代币持有者可以通过 Keplr 将 DYDX 质押在任意活跃的验证节点，可参考该链接查询

操作指南：如何安全地质押DYDX并赚取USDC

关于使用 Keplr 质押 DYDX 的可以参考：https://www.dydx.foundation/how-to-stake/keplr-user

截至目前，dYdX Chain 在上线不到 2 个月的时间内，已向超过 7, 500 名质押者发放了超过 200 万枚 USDC 的质押奖励。

使用 Ledger 安全地进行质押

质押意味着用户需要长期持有 DYDX，其中的安全问题非常重要，用户可以通过与 Keplr 集成的 Ledger 轻松质押 DYDX。

以下是有关如何将 Ledger 与 Keplr 集成的说明：https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/4411149814417-Set-up-and-use-Keplr-to-access-your-Ledger-Cosmos-Ecosystem-Accounts?docs=true

使用 Stride 进行流动性质押（即将推出）

DYDX 代币持有者可以使用 https://app.stride.zone/ 将其 DYDX 在 Stride 进行流动性质押。作为交换，持有者将收到 stDYDX，这将使他们能够继续获得质押奖励，同时保持代币的流动性。这将使用户能够灵活地同时获得质押奖励并在 DeFi 协议中使用这些代币，或者立即退出头寸，而无需等待 dYdX 的 30 天的质押取消期。

在此处查看更多信息：https://dydx.forum/t/announcing-stdydx-and-stride-s-initial-host-chain-validator-set/1960

原文链接

İlgili Okumalar

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

Bernstein's report indicates that High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) prices must double (increase 2-2.5x) in 2027. This is because, while standard DRAM prices have surged approximately 4.5x, HBM prices remain locked in annual contracts, making standard DRAM significantly more profitable per wafer for memory makers (2x the revenue, nearly 3x the gross profit). To maintain capacity allocation for HBM, its price must rise sharply. A critical consequence is that HBM is sold packaged within Nvidia GPUs. To protect its 75% gross margin, Nvidia is likely to pass on HBM cost increases by raising GPU/system prices by about 4x the HBM cost hike. Combined with standard DRAM and NAND price increases, this could raise total AI capital expenditure for cloud providers by around 30%. The report maintains Outperform ratings on Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, significantly raising price targets due to expected upward earnings revisions. KIOXIA is the main loser, having no HBM exposure. MediaTek could benefit if cloud providers seek more ASIC-based alternatives to avoid Nvidia's markup. Valuations have shifted to a P/E basis, reflecting record-high profitability and cash generation expected in this cycle.

marsbit8 dk önce

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

marsbit8 dk önce

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, known as the 'crisis helmsman' of financial markets, has passed away at 100. His nearly 19-year tenure spanned four presidencies, from the 1987 stock market crash to the internet boom. Initially hailed as the 'Maestro' for his crisis management—famously intervening after Black Monday and during the LTCM collapse—his legacy became intertwined with the 2008 financial crisis. His market-friendly philosophy and the "Greenspan Put," an expectation of Fed support during downturns, were praised for fostering stability and growth in the 1990s but later criticized for encouraging excessive risk-taking and contributing to the housing bubble. Greenspan's career encapsulates the central debate of his era: whether markets can self-correct and if central banks should actively deflate asset bubbles. His passing reignites questions about the fine line between stabilizing markets and inadvertently sowing the seeds for the next crisis.

marsbit12 dk önce

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

marsbit12 dk önce

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手17 dk önce

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手17 dk önce

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit42 dk önce

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit42 dk önce

27-Year Reign Ends: SK Hynix Market Cap Surpasses Samsung for First Time, an AI-Driven Reshuffle of Korean Chip Power

On June 22, 2026, SK Hynix made history by surpassing Samsung Electronics in market capitalization, ending Samsung's 27-year reign as South Korea's most valuable company. This dramatic reversal is powered by the AI boom and SK Hynix's dominant position in High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), a critical component for AI model training. Once a heavily indebted firm on the brink of bankruptcy, SK Hynix bet early on HBM, which has evolved from a niche product to essential AI infrastructure. It now commands a 59% share of the global HBM market. Its financial performance is staggering, with Q1 2026 net profit soaring nearly fourfold year-over-year to KRW 40.35 trillion, translating to over 2 billion RMB in daily net profit. HBM now drives roughly 40% of its revenue with exceptionally high margins. In contrast, Samsung, with its broad portfolio spanning memory chips, smartphones, and foundry services, has lagged in the HBM race while facing headwinds in other divisions. This shift signifies a deeper restructuring of South Korea's economy, moving from consumer electronics to AI-driven growth. However, the future remains competitive. With major capacity expansions planned industry-wide by 2028 and Samsung aiming to catch up in HBM technology, the new market leader cannot afford complacency. This event marks a pivotal moment in the global semiconductor industry's ongoing power realignment.

marsbit53 dk önce

27-Year Reign Ends: SK Hynix Market Cap Surpasses Samsung for First Time, an AI-Driven Reshuffle of Korean Chip Power

marsbit53 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片