2026: The Upcoming IPOs of Crypto Companies

marsbit2026-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

By 2026, multiple major crypto companies are preparing for IPOs, signaling a trend of crypto infrastructure firms entering public markets. Kraken, targeting a $20 billion valuation in H1 2026, has strong financials and backing from traditional market makers. Consensys, valued at $7 billion in 2022, plans a mid-2026 IPO, leveraging MetaMask's 30 million monthly users but faces challenges balancing token and shareholder interests. Ledger, aiming for a $4 billion valuation, is shifting from hardware sales to a software-focused model. Bithumb seeks a Korean listing to rebuild trust amid past governance issues. CertiK, valued at $2 billion, announced its IPO plans but must address reputational concerns from past security controversies. These moves reflect improved regulatory clarity and market maturity, though investors must differentiate between companies with solid fundamentals and those with unresolved risks.

Author: David, Deep Tide TechFlow

In 2025, crypto companies raised $3.4 billion in the U.S. stock market.

Circle and Bullish each raised over $1 billion, and Gemini rose 14% on its Nasdaq debut. By January 2026, BitGo rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange, surging 24.6% on the first day, with a market cap of $2.6 billion.

These pioneers proved one thing: Wall Street is willing to pay for compliant crypto infrastructure.

The pipeline for 2026 is even bigger. Kraken, Consensys, and Ledger are all queuing up for IPOs, with valuations ranging from several billion to twenty billion dollars. Even CertiK, a security auditing firm, announced its IPO plans at Davos.

Exchanges, wallets, custody, security... The "water sellers" of the crypto industry are collectively moving toward public markets.

When will these companies go public, what are their valuations, and what are the risks? Let's look at them one by one.

1. Kraken, The $20 Billion Compliance Case Study

Estimated Market Cap: $20 billion

Estimated Time: First Half of 2026

Kraken is one of the oldest crypto exchanges, founded in 2011, a year earlier than Coinbase. But its IPO timing is five years later than Coinbase's. During this gap, it experienced an SEC lawsuit, settlement negotiations, business restructuring, and finally obtained the result of the SEC dropping the case in March 2025.

The financial data is also solid:

2024 revenue was $1.5 billion, with adjusted EBITDA exceeding $400 million. In Q3 2025, single-quarter revenue was $648 million, up 50% year-on-year. Platform assets under management were $59.3 billion, with quarterly trading volume of $576.8 billion.

In November 2025, Kraken completed an $800 million pre-IPO financing round, valuing the company at $20 billion. The investor list included Citadel Securities, Jane Street, and DRW. The entry of these top traditional finance market makers means they are betting that crypto exchanges will become part of the financial infrastructure.

In the same month, Kraken confidentially filed an S-1. The goal is to go public in the first half of 2026.

If successful, it will become the second major crypto exchange to list on the U.S. stock market after Coinbase, and the first company to complete the full IPO process in the "post-Gensler era."

2. Consensys, MetaMask's Parent Company Wants to Go Public

Estimated Market Cap: $7 billion (2022 valuation)

Estimated Time: Mid-2026

Consensys owns some of the most valuable products in crypto: the MetaMask wallet with 30 million monthly active users, the Infura node service supporting the底层 of most Ethereum dApps, and the Linea L2 network. It is the "plumber" of the Ethereum ecosystem; almost all developers use its tools.

The company was founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin. It raised $450 million in 2022 at a $7 billion valuation. It is now working with J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs to prepare for an IPO, targeting mid-2026.

The prospectus is expected to highlight revenue from MetaMask Swaps. This feature allows users to trade tokens directly within the wallet, charging a 0.875% fee per transaction. In 2025, MetaMask also added native Bitcoin support, expanding from a pure EVM wallet to a multi-chain wallet, attempting to keep users within its ecosystem.

The suspense around Consensys' IPO lies in the fact that it is simultaneously working on a MASK token and an IPO. How will these two things be coordinated? Will the interests of token holders and shareholders conflict? This issue may become a new case study in crypto company governance.

3. Ledger, The Hardware Wallet Trying to Tell a Software Story

Estimated Market Cap: $4 billion

Estimated Time: 2026

Ledger has sold over 6 million hardware wallets, custoding over $100 billion in Bitcoin for users. But it doesn't want to just be a "device seller."

In the past two years, CEO Pascal Gauthier has frequently appeared in New York. The story he tells investors is: Ledger wants to become the "Apple of self-custody."

The key to the transformation is Ledger Live, an application that integrates hardware wallets, software wallets, staking, and DeFi interactions. It's shifting from selling hardware to selling subscription services, from one-time revenue to recurring revenue.

Wall Street bought this story.

On January 23, the Financial Times reported that Ledger is in talks with Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays for a NYSE IPO, targeting a valuation of over $4 billion. This number is nearly triple its $1.5 billion valuation in 2023.

Supporting this valuation is performance.

2025 revenue reached hundreds of millions of dollars; Gauthier called it a "record year." After the FTX collapse, the phrase "Not your keys, not your coins" became popular again, and both institutions and retail are moving towards self-custody.

Last year, the amount stolen in the crypto industry hit a new high of $17 billion, which ironically became a selling point for Ledger.

However, hardware wallets are still too difficult for the average person to use. Ledger's growth ceiling depends on whether it can lower this barrier.

4. Bithumb, The South Korean Old Guard's Comeback

Estimated Market Cap: Undisclosed

Estimated Time: 2026

Listing Venue: South Korea KOSDAQ (also considered Nasdaq)

Bithumb was once South Korea's largest exchange but was later overtaken by Upbit. Now Upbit holds over 80% of the South Korean market, while Bithumb has only 15% to 20%.

In 2024, Bithumb launched a zero-fee campaign, bringing its market share back to around 25%. This was a battle of burning money to gain users, perhaps to build momentum for the IPO.

Samsung Securities is the underwriter. The original plan was to list on the South Korean KOSDAQ in the second half of 2025, with Nasdaq also considered. Currently, the timeline appears delayed to 2026.

However, Bithumb says this IPO is not for fundraising. The company has over 400 billion won (approximately $3 billion) in financial assets on its books; it's not short on cash. The purpose of the listing is to "build market trust" by having its internal governance and finances subject to public audit.

The background to this statement is: Bithumb has had constant troubles in recent years.

In 2023, it was raided by the South Korean National Tax Service on suspicion of fraudulent trading. Several executives were investigated for alleged listing bribes, and former CEO Lee Sang-jun stepped down. A service outage in 2017 led to a six-year lawsuit, resulting in a ruling to compensate users.

For the IPO, the company made personnel changes. Former Chairman Lee Jung-hoon returned to the board; he was previously acquitted of fraud charges related to an acquisition. The new CEO is his close associate.

South Korea has 18 million crypto users, and daily trading volume often exceeds that of the stock market.

Bithumb's IPO is a signal of the institutionalization of the South Korean crypto market. But given its historical baggage, investors will scrutinize its governance issues.

5. CertiK, The Controversial Security Auditing Leader

Estimated Market Cap: $2 billion

Estimated Time: Late 2026 - Early 2027

On January 23 at the Davos Forum, CertiK CEO Ronghui Gu announced the company is advancing its IPO plans.

This is the largest security auditing company in the crypto industry, founded in 2018, headquartered in New York, serving over 5,000 clients, with audited code protecting assets worth approximately $600 billion.

The investor list is indeed impressive: Binance is the earliest and largest financial backer, with SoftBank Vision Fund, Tiger Global, Sequoia, and Goldman Sachs also involved. Its valuation reached $2 billion during the B3 funding round in 2022.

But CertiK is also one of the most controversial companies in the crypto space.

The Kraken incident last year was a big deal. CertiK found a vulnerability in Kraken that could credit accounts out of thin air and transferred about $3 million during testing. CertiK called it a "white hat operation"; Kraken called it extortion. The two sides had a public spat, the money was eventually returned, but CertiK's reputation was damaged.

Earlier, CertiK also audited Cambodia's Huione Guarantee. This platform was used for money laundering, buying and selling hacking tools and personal data, and even selling stun guns to scam compounds in Southeast Asia. CertiK later apologized, but this incident showed that the security company's own risk control also has problems.

Gu Ronghui said the IPO is the "natural next step for the continued expansion of products and technology."

But once the IPO prospectus is public, these controversies will be repeatedly questioned by investors. Whether CertiK can rebuild trust is the biggest test on its path to going public.

Overall, the cluster of crypto company IPOs in 2026 might not be a coincidence.

The regulatory environment is changing. SEC Chairman Gensler is gone; the new chairman is more friendly towards crypto; lawsuits against Kraken and Consensys were dropped. The window is open, and those who should are rushing.

The capital structure has also reached its limit. These companies have raised many rounds in the private market, with more and more shareholders, and employee options becoming harder to cash out. Coinbase has been public for five years, proving that crypto companies can survive in the public market. Those waiting in line have no reason to wait any longer.

However, for ordinary investors, this batch of IPOs needs to be differentiated.

Kraken and Ledger have real revenue and clear business models; Consensys has the gateway product MetaMask, but is simultaneously working on a token, and the relationship between shareholders and token holders is not yet sorted out. CertiK has brand recognition but controversy, and Bithumb is a purely South Korean domestic story.

When you can buy, first figure out what you are buying.

For the companies, going public is just the beginning.

Whether they can stand firm in the public market depends on whether these companies can replace the "crypto" label with "financial infrastructure." Coinbase took five years to convince Wall Street it was more than just a crypto trading platform.

For those following, the road is still long.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the estimated valuation and expected IPO timeline for Kraken in 2026?

AKraken is estimated to have a valuation of $20 billion and is expected to conduct its IPO in the first half of 2026.

QWhich company, known for its MetaMask wallet and Infura services, is planning an IPO in mid-2026?

AConsensys, the company behind MetaMask and Infura, is planning an IPO in mid-2026 with an estimated valuation of $7 billion (based on its 2022 valuation).

QWhat is Ledger's new strategic focus as it prepares for its IPO, and what is its target valuation?

ALedger is shifting its focus from selling hardware wallets to becoming a 'self-custody Apple' by offering integrated services like Ledger Live, targeting a valuation of over $4 billion for its IPO.

QWhy is Bithumb pursuing an IPO in 2026, and what challenges does it face?

ABithumb is pursuing an IPO primarily to build market trust and improve its governance and financial transparency, rather than for fundraising. It faces challenges related to past legal issues, including fraud investigations and service interruption lawsuits.

QWhat are the main controversies surrounding CertiK, and how might they impact its planned IPO?

ACertiK faced controversies including the Kraken 'white-hat' incident, where it transferred $3 million during a security test, and its audit of the controversial Huione Guarantee platform. These issues may impact investor trust and scrutiny during its IPO process.

İlgili Okumalar

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit16 dk önce

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit16 dk önce

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1 saat önce

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1 saat önce

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1 saat önce

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1 saat önce

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 saat önce

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片