复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

Odaily星球日报2024-03-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-03-04 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

「帽子狗」万倍,你上车了吗?

原文作者:Luccy,BlockBeats

如果一直关注 meme 领域,你会发现,最近各 meme 图都会出现一个共同标志——毛线帽。这顶毛线帽源于 Solana 链上的 meme 币 WIF,一只带着粉色毛线帽的柴犬。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

目前,据 birdeye 数据,截至撰稿时,WIF 价格已达 1.75 美元。除了价格,WIF 的市值也在一路飙升至 10 亿美元,成为 Solana 历史上最快达到 10 亿市值的 meme 币。迎着这场「帽子狗」热浪,WIF 24 小时交易量超越 USDT, 3 月 3 日,以 17 亿美元的总市值直接超越 BONK。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

在 Solana 激烈的 meme 之争中,WIF 为何脱颖而出?BlockBeats 将现有资料总结如下。

无社区无叙事开场,WIF 的万倍之旅

WIF 可以说是一个「白手起家」的项目,要论 WIF 到底是个什么叙事,大概只能想到柴犬头上这顶编织毛线帽。2019 年 12 月下旬,在电子竞技组织和名人中,将各种徽标和图像添加到毛线帽上的图像作为个人资料图片在 Twitter 上流行起来。

就是在这样没有其余故事烘托的背景下,WIF 在不到 4 个月的时间内实现了万倍涨幅。

WIF 发币过程悄无声息,据 birdeye 数据,WIF 早在去年 11 月 20 日就以 0.00016 美元的价格开盘。但其官方推特账号发布的第一条推文时间显示为 12 月 29 日,且只是一条转发内容而并非原创。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

纵观 WIF 的价格曲线,自去年 12 月中下旬开始出现上涨行情,官推也正是在这个期间现身。

其实可以看出,WIF 开盘至今一直处于上升趋势,并未出现大幅度下跌,但去年底正值 Solana 的 meme 季,百倍币千倍币层出不穷,尤其是 Solana 联创 Anatoly 带头喊单的「傻龙」更是出现上万倍涨幅,所以这个只出现了短暂拉伸的 WIF 并没有被重视。

相关阅读:《复盘傻龙 Silly 的万倍旅程:一条龙是如何成为 Solana 的精神图腾?

1 月 11 日,一笔关于 WIF 的巨额交易损失 77247 枚 SOL(770 万美元),原因竟是当时的 WIF 只有 270 万的流动性,这笔交易也导致 WIF 瞬间插针到 3.99 美元。短短一个月后,如今 WIF 的流动性已突破 1400 万。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

这位被「夹」的巨鲸,使用 86738 枚 SOL 买入 1722 万枚 WIF,按当前 1.75 美元计算,其价值达 3 千多万,仍处于高盈利状态。值得注意是,从该巨鲸的链上 id 可猜测出「WIF 上 Bianance」之意,在这次交易发生的一周后,Binance 宣布于 1 月 18 日上线 WIF 的 1-50 倍 U 本位永续合约。随后,加密货币交易平台 Backpack 也于 1 月 24 日上线 WIF 现货交易。

此外,BitMEX 联合创始人 Arthur Hayes 一直看好 WIF,在《Arthur Hayes:比特币跌破 3.5 万美元后,准备抄底》一文中,他表示「一旦比特币跌破 35, 000 美元,我就会开始抄底,并继续买入 Solana 和 WIF。」

除了各大 KOL 喊单外,WIF 真正开始踏上万倍之旅的时间节点是 3 月 1 日,当时 Robinhood 公布上线 WIF,一时间,不仅是 WIF 的信仰者,其他加密爱好者都将目光转向了 WIF,链上 smart money 们立马拿出上百万屯 WIF。据 Lookonchain 监测,某新建钱包从 Binance 中提取了 16, 160 枚 SOL(215 万美元),并以 0.8871 美元的均价购买了 243 万枚 WIF。

因此,WIF 也顺利突破 1 美元,Coinbase 将其评为第一个突破 1 美元的狗狗币。随后, 3 月 2 日,Arthur Hayes 也再次发推表示看涨 WIF,认为其能涨破 2 美元。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

像 DOGE 又像「老鼠仓」

由于 WIF 的柴犬形象及其上线 Robinhood 后暴涨的发展路线,让很多人想起了当年的 DOGE。

DOGE 充当着很多散户进入加密的领路人角色。2019 年的「GameStop」与 AMC 股票战场时,Robinhood 与多家美国本土券商先后宣布关闭了 GME、AMC 等股票的开仓,不能买入这几只股票后,散户和大量的资金开始瞄准狗狗币。

引入狗狗币后,散户们在这个全美 App Store 免费榜排名第一的 Robinhood 上续创历史。当时,狗狗币最高价格一度冲到了 0.0875 美元,涨幅高达 1014% 。

相关阅读:《一天最高涨 10 倍,DOGE 币一夜登上微博推特热搜

兴许是 Robinhood 和狗狗币的互相成就让散户们对其上的 meme 格外关注,从而拉动 WIF 上涨。但与 DOGE 不同的是,WIF 的发展线路有「老鼠仓」的痕迹。

BlockBeats 大致查阅了 WIF 的官方推特,截至目前,官方并未推出任何激励项目,虽然发推文的频率非常频繁,但其内容只是单纯转发相关话题以及发布带着不同帽子的柴犬 meme 图。不仅第一条推文晚于合约发布一个月,且该账号在 2023 年 4 月份时就已创立,两段空白的时间窗口让人不禁怀疑此账号只是个二手产品。

复盘WIF的万倍之旅:无社区无叙事开场,为何脱颖而出?

如果说「随意的运营」是一种 meme 项目专属的特权,那 1 月 10 日的深度插针似乎很难说得过去。彼时的 WIF 价格还在 0.1 数量级徘徊,这一价格距开盘已有千倍涨幅,谁又能百分百确信 WIF 还将再涨一个数量级呢?更别说损耗几百万去赌一个可能性,这在加密行业也是一个不常见的行动。

此外,正如前文所说,WIF 价格一直处于上涨趋势, 1 月 18 日上线 Binance, 3 月 1 日上线 Robinhood 确实拉动了币价上涨,但在此之前 WIF 就开始了悄悄拉盘。

去年 12 月 18 日,据 Lookonchain 监测,某交易者通过投资 WIF,以 0.01137 美元的平均价格购买了 1986 万枚 WIF, 5 天获利 147 万美元。随后,WIF 继续拉盘,直至 2 月 27 日,在 meme 代币出现普涨行情中,WIF 24 小时涨幅达 62.0% 。

不过对于 meme 来说,情绪上来了,不做多余研究,搏个参与感也是一种选择。但这个先有币价上涨才有社区建立的项目为何暴涨仍然存在很多疑点,BlockBeats 在此提醒读者投资需谨慎,注意甄别风险。

İlgili Okumalar

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit48 dk önce

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit48 dk önce

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit1 saat önce

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片