一个新项目或协议应该关注什么?

区块创新Block Change2024-01-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-01-30 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

让我们来看看 Curve(CRV)的结构。 实质上,Curve 为 LP 提供激励,通过他们的代币经济学鼓励参与者参与治理。而对于 Convex 来说,这里的终极目标是获得尽可能多的 veCRV 以最大化 CRV 奖励。 在明确设定目标之后,项目的创始人应该进一步研究代币的实际价值主张,持有该代币的参与者可以从中获得什么价值?比如: 质押 治理 价值存储 还有更多。如今,看到创始人提出由多种价值主张组成的代币是很常见的。当然,这可能导致对代币的更高需求。 一个完美的例子是 GMX,该代币具有多个价值主张,如治理(启发参与者的真实偏好的能力)、认领(将托管的 GMX 在一段时间内转换为 GMX 的能力)和持有(接收协议收入)。 随着这些价值主张,还有功能参数,这与决定代币的文字功能的变量有关,最简单的例子是转移或销毁。对于团队来说,确保代币的功能参数与其价值主张不冲突是绝对关键的。例如,一个用于价值转移的代币的目标和价值主张应该具有确保其可替代性的功能。以下是代币的一些功能参数: 可转让性(可转让 + 不可转让):分别是 GMX 和 esGMX。 可销毁性(可销毁 + 不可销毁):分别是 BNB 和 SBTs。 可替代性(可替代 + 不可替代):分别是 ERC20 和 ERC721(NFT)。 汇率(浮动 + 固定):分别是 MKR 和 DAI。 有时,团队故意决定一个代币被分配了冲突的价值主张或功能。在这种情况下,代币可以被分为两种或更多种类型。AXS 的著名案例就是一个最好的例子,从最初的单代币模型转变为多代币模型。 最初,AXS 有 3 个价值属性:价值转移、治理和持有。这里的冲突源于参与者如果决定在游戏内进行 AXS 的价值转移,就意味着放弃治理和持有的权益,这对游戏经济造成了问题。为了解决这个问题,他们发布了一个「新」代币 SLP,然后成为游戏内的首选价值转移工具。你可能还记得 STEPN 的 GMT 和 GST 中的同样的双系统。 然而,实施双代币系统可能使代币经济学设计过于复杂,并且有时考虑将外部代币作为辅助代币可能是重要的,以确保更顺畅的交互。一个典型的例子是 ARB,主要用于治理。 为了确保更顺畅的交互,ARB 使用 ETH 作为支付交易费用的手段,因为发生在 L2 上的交易被捆绑在一起并发送到 L1 状态。如果没有引入此外部代币(ETH)作为支付交易费用的手段,将发生以下情况:ARB 用于支付交易费用(gas 费),运营商然后必须将 ARB 兑换成 ETH 以在 L1 上进行验证并在进一步的 gas 费中损失,为 ARB 的增长创造了一种矛盾。 在上述部分,我已经介绍了代币经济学的一般动态和团队应该考虑的各种推动因素,现在让我们来看看代币供应。因为这直接影响代币价格(这是 degen 们想要的)。代币供应的结构如下: 最大供应量 分配百分比(销售、投资者、团队、市场营销、国库等) 分配的分布:分配给初始、归属和奖励发行。 最大供应量很重要,因为这决定了团队是否能够发行代币的最大上限,未限制的代币可能没有很好的价格分布。这不直接影响价格,但是影响发行速率的因素,以及代币是否通货紧缩或通货膨胀是影响价格的因素。 对于有限的最大供应量,例如 CRV(30 亿代币),价格可以上涨。因为随着网络的增长,对代币的需求增加,形成了一个供应有限的高需求区域,这种类型的最大供应的问题在于,如果代币分发不迅速,未来的新贡献者也很难提供激励。 另一方面,拥有无限最大供应可以避免关于未来激励耗尽的问题,当然...

让我们来看看 Curve(CRV)的结构。

实质上,Curve 为 LP 提供激励,通过他们的代币经济学鼓励参与者参与治理。而对于 Convex 来说,这里的终极目标是获得尽可能多的 veCRV 以最大化 CRV 奖励。

在明确设定目标之后,项目的创始人应该进一步研究代币的实际价值主张,持有该代币的参与者可以从中获得什么价值?比如:

质押

治理

价值存储

还有更多。如今,看到创始人提出由多种价值主张组成的代币是很常见的。当然,这可能导致对代币的更高需求。

一个完美的例子是 GMX,该代币具有多个价值主张,如治理(启发参与者的真实偏好的能力)、认领(将托管的 GMX 在一段时间内转换为 GMX 的能力)和持有(接收协议收入)。

随着这些价值主张,还有功能参数,这与决定代币的文字功能的变量有关,最简单的例子是转移或销毁。对于团队来说,确保代币的功能参数与其价值主张不冲突是绝对关键的。例如,一个用于价值转移的代币的目标和价值主张应该具有确保其可替代性的功能。以下是代币的一些功能参数:

可转让性(可转让 + 不可转让):分别是 GMX 和 esGMX。

可销毁性(可销毁 + 不可销毁):分别是 BNB 和 SBTs。

可替代性(可替代 + 不可替代):分别是 ERC20 和 ERC721(NFT)。

汇率(浮动 + 固定):分别是 MKR 和 DAI。

有时,团队故意决定一个代币被分配了冲突的价值主张或功能。在这种情况下,代币可以被分为两种或更多种类型。AXS 的著名案例就是一个最好的例子,从最初的单代币模型转变为多代币模型。

最初,AXS 有 3 个价值属性:价值转移、治理和持有。这里的冲突源于参与者如果决定在游戏内进行 AXS 的价值转移,就意味着放弃治理和持有的权益,这对游戏经济造成了问题。为了解决这个问题,他们发布了一个「新」代币 SLP,然后成为游戏内的首选价值转移工具。你可能还记得 STEPN 的 GMT 和 GST 中的同样的双系统。

然而,实施双代币系统可能使代币经济学设计过于复杂,并且有时考虑将外部代币作为辅助代币可能是重要的,以确保更顺畅的交互。一个典型的例子是 ARB,主要用于治理。

为了确保更顺畅的交互,ARB 使用 ETH 作为支付交易费用的手段,因为发生在 L2 上的交易被捆绑在一起并发送到 L1 状态。如果没有引入此外部代币(ETH)作为支付交易费用的手段,将发生以下情况:ARB 用于支付交易费用(gas 费),运营商然后必须将 ARB 兑换成 ETH 以在 L1 上进行验证并在进一步的 gas 费中损失,为 ARB 的增长创造了一种矛盾。

在上述部分,我已经介绍了代币经济学的一般动态和团队应该考虑的各种推动因素,现在让我们来看看代币供应。因为这直接影响代币价格(这是 degen 们想要的)。代币供应的结构如下:

最大供应量

分配百分比(销售、投资者、团队、市场营销、国库等)

分配的分布:分配给初始、归属和奖励发行。

最大供应量很重要,因为这决定了团队是否能够发行代币的最大上限,未限制的代币可能没有很好的价格分布。这不直接影响价格,但是影响发行速率的因素,以及代币是否通货紧缩或通货膨胀是影响价格的因素。

对于有限的最大供应量,例如 CRV(30 亿代币),价格可以上涨。因为随着网络的增长,对代币的需求增加,形成了一个供应有限的高需求区域,这种类型的最大供应的问题在于,如果代币分发不迅速,未来的新贡献者也很难提供激励。

另一方面,拥有无限最大供应可以避免关于未来激励耗尽的问题,当然,这里的缺点是从长远来看可能会有代币价格下降,因为实质上存在无限供应,除非使用外部模型减少流通(例如:质押、销毁等),否则长期内只能存在下降趋势,而不管其增长如何。

在分配方面,通常是基于最大供应的百分比,实际上确定了每个类别应该分配的最大供应的百分比。主要的类别有:团队(包括创始人、开发者、市场营销等,实际上是负责建设项目的个人),投资者(参与早期/种子/私募轮的人员),国库(运营成本,如研发、储备等),社区(空投、LP 奖励、挖矿奖励等),公开销售(ICO、IDO、IEO、LBP 等)和营销(包括顾问、意见领袖、代理等)。

这些是项目考虑的一些关键要素,然而这些要素对每个项目来说基本上是独特的,可以根据它们的「战略」简化或进一步细分类别。

值得注意的是,在 2020-21 年 DeFi 崛起时,团队意识到通过允许更高奖励给他们的社区,或通过空投增加初始持有者的浮动量,可能会导致网络增长和可持续代币经济的繁荣。

最后,分发。初始供应是在「启动」时立即释放到开放市场的初始浮动量,或者有些人称之为 TGE。分配到这个类别的分配通常是国库、公开销售和我们到处都能看到的臭名昭著的空投的一部分百分比。

对于待解锁的代币,这些通常会被锁定 x 个月/年,通常适用于投资者、国库、团队代币,他们可以自行决定持续时间和何时开始解锁,通常解锁防止大规模的代币抛售,特别是因为这个部分的参与者通常是以低于上市价的估值购买的投资者。

那么,这一切为什么重要呢?

简单来说,代币需求和价值捕获意味着理论上市场参与者应该通过持有代币来获得价值。

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Okumalar

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit11 dk önce

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit11 dk önce

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit18 dk önce

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit18 dk önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 saat önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures

Popüler Makaleler

CRV Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Curve DAO Token (CRV) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Curve DAO Token (CRV) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Curve DAO Token (CRV) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınCurve DAO Token (CRV) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Curve DAO Token (CRV) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Curve DAO Token (CRV) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

440 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

CRV Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların CRV (CRV) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片