为比特币另起炉灶，BounceBit引入质押生息和积分玩法

Odaily星球日报2024-01-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-01-30 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

类Blast积分机制，十分钟TVL破千万美元。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

为比特币另起炉灶，BounceBit引入质押生息和积分玩法

Bounce Brand 于 X 平台发文宣布，比特币质押链 BounceBit 正式上线，用户可以质押 WBTC、BTCB、AUCTION、MUBI、DAII 等代币赚取积分，BounceBit 由币安机构托管组织 Ceffu、Mainnet Digital 和 Breyer Capital 提供支持。

什么是 BounceBit

BounceBit 是基于 PoS 机制的比特币质押链，其目标是为比特币创建一个强大的智能合约执行环境。BounceBit 强调，其不是建立在比特币区块链上的 Layer 2 ，而是使用 PoS 机制的 Layer 1 生态。

BounceBit 具备 EVM 兼容性以及面向原生 BTC 安全性和兼容性，承认并纳入了如 BNB 链上的 BTCB 和以太坊上的 WBTC 等资产，使 BTC 的用例多样化，扩大生态参与度，从而丰富了整个 BTC 资产类别。

BounceBit 引入了双代币质押系统，验证者需要同时持有 BounceBit 原生代币（暂未定名）和 BTC。BounceBit 持有者的收益包括收入分配和治理权利。

BounceBit 的安全性由原生 BTC 网络和 CeFi 基金会提供，后者通过 Mainnet Digital 和币安机构托管组织 Ceffu 的监管托管来实现。其运作流程如下：

（Odaily星球日报注：Ceffu 在其网站上表示，它是“币安交易所唯一的机构托管合作伙伴”。去年，美国监管机构将 Ceffu 描述为一个“与币安相关的神秘实体”。）

  • 用户将 BTC 存入币安，然后提现至 BNB Chain，代币将自动转换为 BTCB

  • 通过 BounceBit 官方链接存入 BTCB

  • BTCB 将转移给受监管实体 Mainnet Digital 保管，用户将获得 BTCB 和 LSD 代币激励

  • 用户可以使用 LSD 代币参与一系列资产管理服务

  • 用户可以选择将 LSD 代币跨链至 BounceBit 链，进行生态活动参与

  • 用户还可以向验证节点质押 LSD 代币

为比特币另起炉灶，BounceBit引入质押生息和积分玩法

比特币生息机制

比特币生态中，资产生息是一个独特的挑战，与以太坊等链存在显著区别，当 BTC 被限制在多签钱包中，目前主流的比特币协议无法使其产生回报。BounceBit 旨在通过 PoS 机制来构建去中心化验证器网络，将 BTC 从被动资产转变为主动生息资产，BounceBit 为用户引入了三种收益：

  • CeFi：通过 Mainnet Digital 和 Binance Mirror 的受监管托管以及各种资产管理服务获得奖励；

  • 质押和 PoS 挖矿的节点运营奖励；

  • BounceBit 生态系统应用衍生的 DeFi 收益率。

为比特币另起炉灶，BounceBit引入质押生息和积分玩法

BounceBox

除了生息机制，BounceBox 是 BounceBit 的另一关键要素，BounceBox 是一个应用构建与分发平台，使用户能够快速设计、启动和监控 DApp。BounceBox 通过直观的设计和丰富组件供应，提供包括去中心化交易所（DEX）、IDO 产品和交易市场等组件，简化 DApp 开发流程，旨在使具备最少技术知识的用户也可以轻松地构建 DApp。

“水浒传“TVL 活动

目前，BounceBit 开启了名为“水浒传”（THE WATER MARGIN）的 TVL 活动，用户可通过该活动获得 BounceBit 积分奖励。用户可以在 BNB Chain 上质押 BTCB，在以太坊上质押 WBTC、AUCTION、MUBI 和 DAII。所有存入的资金将在 2024 年 5 月 BounceBit 主网启动时开放提取。

该活动与 Blast 类似，其积分获取规则如下：

  • 基于存入的美元金额获得积分；

  • 基于邀请和受邀者存入的美元金额获得积分；

  • 对于直接邀请的团队，每累积 0.1 BTC 存款将为推荐双方各赢得一次 Boost 抽奖机会。可能获得加速沙漏时间的 Swift 卡或 Boost 卡，Boost 卡分为 R、SR、SSR 多个等级，可获得额外积分奖励。

为比特币另起炉灶，BounceBit引入质押生息和积分玩法

路线图

BounceBit 将于三月上线测试网， 4 月 23 日上线主网， 5 月进行空投，同时开放 BounceBit 积分兑换和资产提取。

小结

BounceBit 的生息机制和低代码开发创新程度较低，但 BounceBit 参与机构和 Bounce Brand 一直以来对 BTCB 的宣发和支持，构成一定程度的币安背景背书，上线 10 分钟 TVL 即突破千万美元，整体具备一定参与价值。

İlgili Okumalar

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1 saat önce

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1 saat önce

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1 saat önce

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1 saat önce

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片