AMM上线后Deez Nuts翻倍，用户可以做些什么？

Odaily星球日报2024-01-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-01-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

24小时涨幅185%

1 月 27 日，Solana 生态新代币标准 Tiny SPL 上线了 AMM 交易。随后，其代币 DN（Deez Nuts）地板价 24 小时涨幅达 185% ，截至撰稿时为 0.004 SOL。

社区首先注意到 Tiny SPL，是因为其曾获得 Solana 联合创始人 Anatoly 转发并置顶在推特主页上，BlockBeats 曾在 1 月 5 日所发布的《被 Solana 创始人推特置顶，新代币标准 Tiny SPL 是什么？》一文中介绍过 Tiny SPL。

Deez Nuts 最初可免费 mint，铸造完毕后，DN 的地板价在突破 0.2 SOL 后急速下跌至不到 0.001 SOL。而近期随着 AMM 交易功能上线，Deez Nuts 的流动性被激活，Tiny SPL 再度迎来了关注。

AMM上线后Deez Nuts翻倍，用户可以做些什么？

引入状态压缩方法的 Tiny SPL

Tiny SPL 的特别之处是引入了「状态压缩（state compression）」方法，可以让用户在 Solana 上持有代币时不需要支付存储租金。

租金是 Solana 账户模型中独有的概念。租金与交易费用不同，交易费用是为了处理网络上的指令而支付的。而租金是为把数据存储在 Solana 区块链上所付出的成本。与以太坊不同，Solana 会收取在其网络上的账户一笔用于存储数据状态的费用，即租金。租金按照账户所存储的代币余额大小进行定期收费，如果账户无法支付租金，系统将删除这个账户，以减少为那些不再维护的数据花费存储成本。

资管公司 VanEck 在一篇对 Solana 的估值报告中提到，Solana 上的租金存储费用为每字节 0.00000348 SOL，钱包数据大小为 372 字节，每个活跃钱包持有者必须保留 0.0026 SOL。同样，应用程序和代币智能合约也必须维持这些存储费用。一个像 Serum 这样大约有 340 KB 大小的程序，为了避免支付租金，需要保留 2.4 SOL 的余额。

状态压缩方法是 Solana 在 2023 年 4 月推出的一种存储数据的新方法，可将 Merkle 树的可验证性压缩成一个哈希，允许开发人员在链上存储少量数据并直接在 Solana 账本中更新，大幅降低数据存储成本，同时保持 Solana 基层的安全性和去中心化。这也是为什么 Tiny SPL 的 logo 是一颗倒过来的树。

AMM上线后Deez Nuts翻倍，用户可以做些什么？

目前，状态压缩方法已经可大幅降低 Solana 上的 NFT 铸造成本，据 Solana 基金会介绍，截至 2023 年 4 月 5 日，在 Solana 上铸造 100 万个未压缩的 NFT 成本超过 250, 000 美元。而使用状态压缩的 NFT 铸造成本大约是 110 美元。此前，热门 DePIN 项目 Helium Mobile 在迁移至 Solana 时铸造了近 100 万个 NFT，其铸造成本仅需 113 美元。

因此，通过状态压缩功能，Solana 可为创作者和品牌方提供一种无需支付大量成本、就可向更广泛的受众提供大量 NFT 的方法。现在，Tiny SPL 将状态压缩方法应用到了代币资产上，与使用常规 SPL 标准的代币相比，Tiny SPL 代币不需要支付租金。此外，Tiny SPL 代币不会显示在用户的钱包余额中，而是仅在 NFT 部分可见。基于 Tiny SPL 的代币资产为「DN（Deez Nuts）」，因为所对应的图像是两只花生，所以中文社区也称其为「花生」。

用户可以做什么？

目前，Tiny SPL 的流动性池已经启动，支持 Tiny SPL 标准的代币交易。用户进入 https://tinys.pl/，链接钱包，点击 Swap 即可进入交易界面，只需输入需要交易的数额，点击「Swap」交易。

由于 Deez Nuts 可拆分或合并，只有用户持有中最大份额的 Deez Nuts 可进行交易，因此如果要卖出 Deez Nuts，可以提前将 Deez Nuts 进行合并。Deez Nuts 的拆分和合并过程在《被 Solana 创始人推特置顶，新代币标准 Tiny SPL 是什么？》已有介绍。

除了交易，用户还可以将持有的 NUTS 加入到 AMM 池中作为 LP，截至目前已经有超 1300 多个 SOL 被添加到 AMM 池中。贡献者将在 LP 池中锁定 1 个月，之后所得 LP 代币将按比例返还给贡献者。初始 LP 贡献者将赚取代币锁定当月交易量的全部 1% 交易费。

AMM上线后Deez Nuts翻倍，用户可以做些什么？

Deez Nuts 的「重生」离不开 Tiny SPL 的创始人sol_idity的努力，推出 Deez Nuts 后，创始人一边开发批量合成和 AMM 交易功能，一边不断呼吁 Solana 上的 DEX 聚合器 birdeye 为 DN 添加索引。得益于创始人和社区共同努力， 1 月 20 日 Deez Nuts 在官推上呼吁筹款后的 24 小时内，就完成了 800 SOL / 400, 000 NUTS 的筹款目标。

AMM上线后Deez Nuts翻倍，用户可以做些什么？

据创始人表示，接下来的几周将为 Tiny SPL 代币创建新的实用程序、改进钱包对协议的支持以及开源 Tiny SPL 标准。需要提醒的是，一方面，随着「状态质押」技术展现出更大的应用潜力，Deez Nuts 作为第一个采用这个技术的代币协议，在乐观的投资者眼中拥有「Solana 上的 ORDI」这样的定位。但 Deez Nuts 目前的定位更像是 meme 与 NFT 的结合，尚没有实际应用场景，投资者在进行交易时需谨慎评估风险。

İlgili Okumalar

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 saat önce

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 saat önce

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6 saat önce

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 saat önce

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 saat önce

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures