四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

Odaily星球日报2024-01-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-01-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

具备多维链上数据分析能力,但理解能力与深入程度待改进。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

昨日,Scopescan 宣布推出其AI 交易助手Scopechat,功能包括“获取任何加密代币的详细分析交易报告;发现最新趋势和热门代币;提出任何 Web3 问题并快速获得答案”。

Scopechat 初始化界面进行了四类问题的推荐:

  1. 代币:代币关键信息、交易信号、持有者分布情况、价格历史、交易所转入转出情况;

  2. 项目:项目基本信息、相关地址、财务信息、链上指标、异常指标变动、TVL;

  3. 钱包:钱包地址潜在风险(基于历史交易)、特定地址的代币持有情况、操作异动、资金流向、关联地址;

  4. 排名和统计数据:过去 24 小时涨幅最大的 30 个代币、近期顶级聪明钱包、Gas 消耗最大十个地址、DEX 交易量最大 10 个代币、上个月解锁量前十代币。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

下面,Odaily星球日报将测试其中与用户日常操作息息相关的问题,考察 Scopechat 的优劣势。

代币查询

TROLL 的交易信号及基本信息

Scopechat 回答如下:

  • 看涨信号

中心化交易所充提:过去一周,交易所净流出价值 19, 432 美元的 TROLL。随着投资者将代币转移到钱包中进行存储,这可能表明看涨情绪。 TROLL 的平均提现价格为 0.0 { 7 } 707 USDT。 MA:当前 TROLL 代币价格高于移动平均线(MA),并且 MA 呈上升趋势,可能预示着看涨的市场趋势。

  • 看跌指标:

Smart Money 信号:在过去 7 天内, 216 个 Smart Money 地址以每个代币 0.0 美元的平均价格购买了 121, 337, 125, 383, 484.5 个 TROLL 代币。然而,他们已经卖掉了所购买的 TROLL 的 89.264% ,从而获得了 140.47% 的收益。这可能表明聪明货币投资者的看跌倾向。

布林带:当前 TROLL 代币价格高于布林带上轨,表明市场存在潜在超买以及短期反转或回调的可能性。

RSI:目前 RSI 为 98.38 ,市场可能被视为超买,调整可能即将到来。

  • 去哪买:

CEX:TROLL 交易量最高的中心化交易所是 HTX 和 BingX。

DEX:Uniswap V2(以太坊)拥有 DEX 中最高的交易量, 24 小时交易量为 28, 226, 278.85 美元。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

综上,Scopechat 能够给出一定链上指标,并能提供较为详实的基本数据,对于交易存在一定帮助。

提供的图表可交互,数据可切换(CEX、DEX、转账;多维时间;多链)。

但是 Scopechat 出现使用传统技术分析指标(对于 Meme 失效)、数据错误(购入均价 0.0 美元)等情况。

给出相关 Meme 叙事的代币列表

在进行上一问题的提问之后,Scopechat 表示,提问者可能是在进行交易的尽职调查或逻辑支撑,因此推荐了三个问题“TROLL 的总结”、“给出相关 Meme 叙事的代币列表”、“TROLL 的主要交易”,本处选取问题 2 ,Scopechat 给出了非常全面的 Meme 代币列表。

但本处比较准确的答案应是“Musk 喊单概念”,Scopechat 未能有效识别

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

哪些中心化交易所上架了 TROLL

Scopechat 的回答为:下图为以太坊链上代币 TROLL 的充值和提现数据。交易所存款和取款统计数据可以反映交易者对特定代币的情绪。更多的提款可能意味着长期持有,而更多的存款可能意味着出售的意图。将其与其他指标相关联以确认趋势和情绪之间的联系非常重要。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

该数据用于交易分析具备一定意义,但对于这个具体提问,Scopechat 问题识别错误。截止发文时,包括 Bitget、BitMart 等多家 CEX 已上架 TROLL。

项目查询

Blast 项目链上指标有何异常变化

Scopechat 表示:“如果我理解正确的话,您正在寻找 Blasts 异常的链上活动。我选择了一些指标来衡量异常行为,具体规则请点击这里。以下显示了以太坊链上 Blast 项目最近异常的链上活动。”

其异动情况回答如下:

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

用户可根据数据的变化,进一步的溯源项目本身的活动与计划,以对项目做出进一步判断。但此处出现了几个问题:

  • 虽然 Scopechat 给出了异动规则链接,实际上该链接并不存在。

  • 定义不明,没有给出数据的具体来源日期。

为什么 PENDLE 币价快速上涨,协议方面有什么异常数据

首次提问的原文为“why did PENDLE price surge? any unusual data?”,Scopechat 给出了币价走势图。在第二次提问中强调了“项目的”异常数据,Scopechat 采用前一小节的相同模板进行回答。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

钱包查询

钱包风险查询

以下为官方推荐的查询题目,Scopechat 表示,该地址链接到了恶意地址上,因此存在风险。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

另外从 X 平台搜索了两个报告被盗地址,其中一个地址 Scopechat 显示未发现风险,另一个给出了与官方推荐相似的结论。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

此处可以推断,Scopechat 的风险判别为识别和提示与恶意地址发生过交互的情况,但通常来讲交互若已发生,被盗事件应也已发生,意义不大。

KuCoin 持有前 10 名的代币信息

该问题为官方推荐问题,但 Scopechat 第一次表示没有相关信息。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

再次输入同样问题后,Scopechat 表示基于 Adot(另一Web3 AI 查询引擎)有如下数据。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

以上数据显然非正确数据,另可基于 Arkham 得到 KuCoin 实体持有的主要代币如下:

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

排名查询

以太坊近期表现最好的代币

Scopechat 直接给出了一系列代币列表,按照盈利降序排名。根据表单表现形式,预计是基于聪明钱包的平均入场价格和当前价格,计算出平均盈利情况所得出的。但盈利金额都较小,可参考性存疑。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

以太坊上聪明钱包地址

Scopechat 给出的聪明钱包地址,多数都交易了 TROLL、SMILEY 等代币,符合当前的热门代币情况。但近期报道 TROLL 盈利超百万美元的钱包并不在其列。

四套题测评AI助手Scopechat,能否作为可靠的交易参考?

结论

综上,Scopechat 在其本身业务链上数据追踪方面具备一定优势,用户能够通过 Scopechat 进行多维度的链上数据提取和转化,整体展现的数据也较为详实易用。性能较好,各类问题通常能在 30 秒内汇总给出答案。

另一方面,基于以上问题测评可以初步得出 Scopechat 还存在着自然语义处理能力不足、准确性不足、深入程度有限等问题。

İlgili Okumalar

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit2 saat önce

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit2 saat önce

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit5 saat önce

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit5 saat önce

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit8 saat önce

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit8 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片