BNB Chain发力比特币生态,有哪些潜力项目值得关注?

Odaily星球日报2023-12-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

比特币生态的IEO时刻

昨晚,Binance 宣布上线新币挖矿项目 Sleepless AI(AI),BNB 短时突破 300 美元, 24 小时涨幅达 11.98% 。与此同时,BNB Chain 生态的一众项目也迎来普涨行情。

前几日,社区传言 Binance 的 Web3 钱包将会接入铭文市场,引发铭文价格回暖。目前官方仍没有确切消息,但从市场表现来看,BNB Chain 发力比特币生态是一件有迹可循的事情。

目前,整个比特币赛道仍处于新项目爆发期,为加密用户提供早期项目发现是最快捷的获取市场增量的方法之一。BakerySwap 是 BNB chain 试水比特币生态的探路石,但面对如此一个关注度如此之高、新项目和协议层出不穷的比特币生态,BNB chain 显然不会止步于此,而 Binance 同样不会止步于此。BlockBeats 整理了目前 BNB Chain 生态中值得关注的其他潜力项目,仅供读者参考。

Dego Finance(DEGO)

12 月 25 日,NFT+DEFI 聚合器 Dego Finance 宣布完成其 BRC 20 Launchpad BETA 版本测试,消息公布后,其原生代币 DEGO 价格突破 4.2 美元, 24 小时涨幅 64.1% 。

昨日,Dego Finance 还推出了 DEGO 质押计划,称 Launchpad 规则将在未来 7 天内发布。

BNB Chain发力比特币生态,有哪些潜力项目值得关注?

DEGO 质押天数与提前质押率对应表;图源:Dego Finance官方文档

LeverFi(LEVER)

12 月 27 日,去中心化杠杆交易平台 LeverFi 宣布推出 BRC 20 Launchpad 平台 LeverPro。消息公布后,LeverFi 原生代币 LEVER 价格拉升至 0.0025 美元, 24 小时涨幅超过 50% 。

据官方文档介绍,LeverPro 近期计划推出三个项目,其将重点关注抵押稳定币、BRC 20 资产借贷以及 AMM 互换和流动性挖矿赛道协议。

在 LeverFi 的 2024 年路线图中也提到其将致力于推进 BTC 和 BRC 20 生态系统,包括推出 LVR 代币作为 BRC 20 代币进行交易以及 BTC 生态系统内的 DeFi 开发(借贷和 AMM)。

Bitcoin Cats(1CAT

比特币链游项目 Bitcoin Cats 是 BakerySwap 的首次 Launchpad 项目,在此之后,BakerySwap 的每一期新发射项目都可以使用 BAKE 和 1 Cat 进行参与,这也持续为 Bitcoin Cats 进行价值赋能。随着第三期 Launchpad 项目即将到来, 1 CAT 价格再一次拉升, 24 小时涨幅 80.96% 。

BNB Chain发力比特币生态,有哪些潜力项目值得关注?

相关阅读:《IDO 超募 1 亿美元,比特币链游 Bitcoin Cats 为什么火?

12 月 25 日,Bitcoin Cats 宣布推出「 1 CAT 金铲计划」,参与者可通过质押 1 CAT 代币来赚取生态系统合作伙伴的代币,此次计划的首个合作项目为 BitLand。用户可在官方网站上质押 1 CAT 代币,挖掘 BLLB 代币。此活动将于本周末开始,持续两个月,总奖励为 5 亿枚 BLLB,占其总供应量的 5% 。

据官方介绍, 1 CAT 不仅是 Bitcoin Cats 游戏中的主要资产,还将作为通往更广阔生态系统的「金铲」,未来将进一步融入 Bitcoin Cats 的游戏机制中,为用户提供多元化的奖励。

NFPrompt(NFP)

12 月 20 日,Binance 推出第 41 期新币挖矿项目 NFPrompt(NFP),NFPrompt 是一个面向 Web3 创作者的人工智能驱动用户原创内容(UGC)平台,是今年 6 月 Binance Labs 第六季的孵化项目之一。

昨日,NFPrompt 宣布将在 BNB Chain 推出 AIGC 铭文平台及交易市场。通过构建连接 AIGC 和铭文的基础设施,NFPrompt 将成为首个用户可以轻松铸造和交易特殊铭文的平台,NFPrompt 还将提供一个市场来促进这些铭文的交换,同时维护分配和贸易的公平性。

相关阅读:《一文读懂币安最新 Launchpool 项目 NFPrompt(NFP)

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit16 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit16 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit18 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit18 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit39 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit39 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片