Hashdex Names BitGo as Bitcoin ETF Custodian as Applicants Continue SEC Meetings

CoinDeskPolicy2023-12-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A bitcoin ETF may be approved or rejected in the first few days of the new year.

Would-be bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) issuer Hashdex changed its paperwork Friday, naming BitGo as its bitcoin custodian and changing the name of its Bitcoin Futures ETF to the Hashdex Bitcoin ETF as it – and other companies – continue to hope for an approval for the U.S.'s first spot bitcoin ETF early in the new year.

Hashdex has come to an agreement with crypto custodian BitGo to according to an amended S-1 filing, a rare outlier among the over a dozen applicants. The vast majority have signed agreements with crypto exchange Coinbase, while Fidelity intends to self-custody and VanEck tapped Gemini, another exchange.

9.9K

The update comes a day after the SEC met with representatives from a number of other applicants.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Representatives from BlackRock, Valkyrie, Fidelity, Grayscale and Ark all spoke to officials with the SEC on Thursday, according to filings. The regulators set a Dec. 29 deadline for final amendments to the applications, Reuters reported.

Hopes that a spot bitcoin ETF will be given the regulatory green light in the near future have risen in recent weeks. A number of applicants have met with the SEC and filed various amendments to their applications, specifying that they will issue their ETFs with cash creation (if approved) rather than in-kind and addressing other minor details, suggesting the SEC is open to an approval.

Jan. 10, 2024 is the final deadline for the Ark 21Shares filing. Any approval or rejection from the SEC will have to come by that date, though Reuters reported that a decision may come as early as the first few days of the new year.

İlgili Okumalar

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

Solana's first formal on-chain governance vote concluded on August 27th, coinciding with SOL hitting a yearly high. Three key proposals aimed at reshaping the network's tokenomics were decided. Solana's core challenge is a massive usage-to-value capture gap. Despite processing 120x more transactions than Ethereum and leading in DEX volume, its fee revenue is significantly lower due to its fee structure. Currently, most fees (priority fees) go to validators, with only a small base fee partially burned. This results in high net inflation (approx. 6k SOL issued vs. ~650 burned daily). The three proposals seek to address this: **SGP-0001** establishes the formal governance framework. **SGP-0002** (Double Deflation Acceleration) proposes doubling the annual reduction rate of new SOL issuance from 15% to 30%, aiming to reach the terminal inflation rate by 2029 instead of 2032, reducing issuance by an estimated 18.9 million SOL. **SGP-0003** (Resource & Entry Fee Restructuring) would split the base fee into a fixed "entry fee" for block producers and a variable, fully burned "resource fee." This could increase daily SOL burns by ~14x to 7,500-9,000. Major stakeholders like Helius, Jupiter, and Jito support the changes. However, opposition exists, notably from Solana Company (HSDT), whose revenue is 99.4% from staking. They argue rapid changes could disrupt institutional adoption. Critics also highlight a potential conflict where validators can vote against reduced staking yields using delegated SOL without explicit voter consent. The outcome of these votes provides a directional mandate. If passed, they represent a significant step towards aligning Solana's immense network activity with tangible economic value for SOL holders.

marsbit4 dk önce

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

marsbit4 dk önce

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

Chinese Venture Capital: Shifting from "Picking Founders" to "Picking Cities" The article discusses a significant shift in China's venture capital (VC) landscape. Historically, VC investments heavily focused on the individual founder's vision, track record, and capability, as seen in early internet-era successes like Wang Xing (Meituan), Li Bin (Nio), and Li Xiang (Li Auto). The belief was that betting on exceptional people was the key to success. However, the rise of hard tech startups—in fields like semiconductors, robotics, AI, and biotech—has changed this calculus. These industries depend heavily on deep, localized ecosystems: specialized talent pools, established supply chains, manufacturing bases, and application scenarios. A city's industrial "resume" now significantly impacts a startup's chances. Examples include Shenzhen's dominance in robotics, Beijing's concentration of AI firms, Suzhou's biotech cluster, and Hefei's successful bet on semiconductor giant ChangXin. This shift is further driven by changes in funding sources. Government-guided funds and state-owned capital now dominate VC limited partners (LPs). These "patient capital" investors prioritize local economic development, job creation, and industrial chain growth alongside financial returns. Their early bets signal viability to other investors. Ultimately, the VC logic remains about managing risk and increasing the odds of success. In the hard tech era, a supportive city ecosystem provides crucial resources—talent, suppliers, R&D, and policy stability—that a single founder cannot easily assemble. The investment due diligence process has thus expanded from evaluating just the founder to also evaluating the founder's city. Consequently, capital is concentrating in a few regions with strong, focused industrial foundations, challenging other cities to build compelling, credible ecosystems to attract investment.

marsbit58 dk önce

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

marsbit58 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片