Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

Odaily星球日报2023-12-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

除了傻龙,还有哪些 Meme 正在 Solana 上「兴风作浪」?

原文作者:Karen,Foresight News

Solana 生态的 Meme 热潮正在席卷整个 Crypto 市场,Solana 联合创始人 toly 在 Breakpoint 峰会明牌推荐的 Meme 「傻龙」 Silly Dragon 近两天时间里急涨 6 倍,市值来到 8600 万美元,过去一周涨幅超过 13 倍。而那只戴着毛线帽的柴犬和永远在啊吧啊吧的猫也成了近几天社区中热议的焦点。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

本文整理了除 Silly Dragon 外当下 Solana 生态中热度较高的一系列 Meme 项目,不过在正文前还是需要提醒一下,Meme 高涨势头也伴随着风险和不确定性,需要参与者保持理性和谨慎,DYOR。

dogwifhat(WIF)

根据官方网站描述,「dogwifhat 可不仅仅是一只带着帽子的狗,也是进步的象征,是那些敢于超前思考的人的风向标。」

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

当前,WIF 持有地址数超过 2.2 万个,市值 2 亿美元,Solscan 数据显示,WIF 当前供应量 998, 921, 844 枚,持有分布相对分散,链上第一大持有地址持有 8.2697% 的代币,第二大到第 7 大地址持有 1% 至 2.5% 的代币。

官网:https://dogwifcoin.org/

Leia the Cat(LEIA)

Leia the Cat 以 Solana 联合创始人 Raj Gokal 的猫 Leia 命名。LEIA 总量 100 亿枚,购买或出售时会自动销毁 1% 的税费,从而实现通货紧缩模型。Leia 当前的供应量为 9, 838, 825, 776.20 ,持有者数量为 9208 ,目前市值为 377 万美元。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

官网:https://leiaonsolana.com/

Pop Cat(POPCAT)

Pop Cat 就是那些让你眼前一亮的视频,其中使用一只名叫 Oatmeal 的猫的照片,并将猫咪的嘴巴 PS 成一个大大的「O」形状,简直是太可爱了。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

POPCAT 代币没有税收, 93.1% 的代币被发送到流动性池,LP 代币被销毁,其余 6.9% 的供应量被保存在多签钱包中,仅用作未来中心化交易所上市、跨链和流动性池的代币。

POPCAT 目前的最大供应量为 979, 978, 668 枚,持有者数量有 9472 个,当前市值不到 2000 万美元。

官网:https://popcatsol.com/

KnobCoin(KNOB)

KNOB 其实就是 BONK 倒过来拼写的,没有 Pre-Seed,没有预启动,流动性代币被永久销毁。KNOB 总供应量为 100 亿,当前持有地址数为 3667 个,稀释市值为 1058 万美元。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

官网:https://www.knobcoin.xyz/

melon(MELON)

melon 是一只带着西瓜帽的狗,推特粉丝数只有 282 个,不过已有 2199 个持有者。最大总供应量为 407, 587, 722 个,当前稀释市值为 267 万美元,Birdeye 的统计数据显示, 24 小时涨近百分之两万。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

官方推特:https://twitter.com/melondogcoin

FLIPPUR

FLIPPUR 是酷到爆炸的海豚,嘴里叼着一支烟,散发着酷劲十足的气场。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

https://birdeye.so/token/ ErA 775 QAWyMcyuH 1 UHnRB 5 hjJjrqSHVS 51 HjSF 3 zQzQr ?chain=solana

Chonk(CHONK)

Chonk 是一只留着口水的肥猫。CHONKY 最大总供应量为 499, 981, 615, 767 个,持有地址数达 1.77 万个,当前的稀释市值为 2800 万美元。

Chonk 官网在描述购买 CHONK 的理由时「赤裸裸」地写到,「天呐,我长得太胖了,我的旧房子都装不下我了!买些胖嘟嘟的 CHONK 吧,这样我就可以倾销给你,然后买一座新房子。拜托了,你真的能对这张可爱的脸说不吗?」

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

官网:https://solchonky.xyz/

Peepo(PEEP)

Peepo 没有预售,团队没有接受任何代币分配, 80% 的供应量空投给活跃的 Solana 钱包和社区(任何未空投的代币都将被销毁), 20% 将用于支持初始 LP + LP 激励。

Silly Dragon一周13倍,Solana生态还有哪些Meme项目值得关注?

PEEP 当前的最大总供应量为 54, 892, 581, 928 枚,FDV 在 1100 万美元左右,持有地址数多达 5.2 万个。

再次提醒,投资 Meme 需谨慎,DYOR。

İlgili Okumalar

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit14 dk önce

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit14 dk önce

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit21 dk önce

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit21 dk önce

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbit22 dk önce

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbit22 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片