Data Shows Large Institutions Are Still Active In Bitcoin OTC Trading

Bitcoinist2022-04-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-04-30 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On-chain data shows large institutional investors are still active in the Bitcoin market through over-the-counter (OTC) trading. While Bitcoin Fund...

On-chain data shows large institutional investors are still active in the Bitcoin market through over-the-counter (OTC) trading.
While Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio Goes Down, Tokens Transferred Moves Up
As pointed out by an analyst in a CryptoQuant post, institutional investors still seem to be active in the BTC market behind the scenes.
The “tokens transferred” is an indicator that measures the total amount of coins being transacted on the Bitcoin network.
“Fund flow ratio” tells us what part of these tokens being moved are going into or out of exchanges. Its value is calculated by simply dividing the total transactions involving exchanges by the total tokens transferred.
Usually, big values of the fund flow ratio indicate that large institutional investors have been selling or buying recently.
However, since the middle of last year, the metric has been observing a decline. The below chart shows the trend in the Bitcoin fund flow ratio, as well as the tokens transferred indicator.

Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio

It looks like the value of the ratio has observed further downtrend recently | Source: CryptoQuant
As you can see in the above graph, the Bitcoin fund flow ratio saw some heavy decline last year, but it started moving sideways around October.
Recently, however, the metric has again showed some downwards movement. This means that whales and institutional investors haven’t been using exchanges lately.
While the ratio has remained at these low values, the tokens transferred indicator has rather observed many large spikes during the period. The indicator also looks to be catching an uptrend most recently as well.
Such large values would suggest that institutions are still present in the Bitcoin market; they have just been moving their coins outside centralized exchanges.
Over-the-counter deals is one way to trade outside exchanges. Newer investment vehicles like ETFs would also be responsible for some of the movement from institutions.
BTC Price
At the time of writing, Bitcoin’s price floats around $38.7k down 4% in the last seven days. Over the past month, the crypto has lost 18% in value
Below is a chart that shows the trend in the price of the coin over the last five days.

Bitcoin Price Chart

The price of BTC seems to have continued its consolidation in the last few days | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView
Bitcoin touched above $40k once again earlier today, but the crypto looks to have been once again rejected from the level.
The coin has now already dropped below the $39k level, retreading the small recovery it made over the last few days.

İlgili Okumalar

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

Zcash Orchard Bug: Four Key Questions Answered A critical forgery vulnerability was discovered in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, raising four major concerns for users. 1. **Was the Orchard bug exploited?** The likelihood is considered low. The bug was found proactively using advanced AI-assisted tools and was promptly patched, limiting any potential attack window. If exploitation had occurred, evidence would likely have surfaced by now. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** It is believed so, based on the assessment that the bug was not exploited. If forgery did happen, existing "turnstile" mechanisms could prevent full recovery of legitimate funds if forged coins were moved out first, though this scenario is deemed unlikely. Users can choose to move funds, but this carries risks like loss of privacy or new wallet/software issues. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Currently, no. The vulnerability's prior existence prevented independent verification of the shielded supply. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade will restore this ability by sealing the Orchard pool, allowing anyone running a node to verify that the circulating ZEC does not exceed the correct amount. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing intensive audits by multiple teams, including AI-assisted analysis, have not found additional forgery vulnerabilities, increasing confidence that none remain. Further work and collaborations are planned to provide additional guarantees. In conclusion, while the team assesses that exploitation was unlikely and the supply is safe, the upcoming upgrade is critical to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's supply integrity, moving away from reliance on trust.

marsbit44 dk önce

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

marsbit44 dk önce

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

**Summary: Zcash Orchard Vulnerability Analysis** A critical forgery vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising concerns about the coin's supply and user funds. The developers, led by Zcash Open Development Labs, acted swiftly to temporarily freeze the pool and deploy a fix. The article addresses four key questions: 1. **Was the vulnerability exploited?** While unknown, the developers believe it is unlikely for several reasons: the bug was difficult to find, using advanced AI tools; the fix was deployed quickly; and typical crypto exploits are fast, with no evidence of abnormal outflows. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** If the bug was not exploited, all funds are safe. If exploited, a mechanism limits total withdrawals from the pool to the amount legitimately entered, potentially blocking some legitimate funds. The developers deem this unlikely but advise cautious users to consider moving funds, noting the privacy and risk trade-offs of moving to transparent or Sapling pools. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Not currently. The vulnerability temporarily broke the ability for users to independently verify that no extra ZEC was created. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing audits by multiple teams, including using advanced AI analysis, have so far found no others, increasing confidence. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade is the core solution. It will **seal** the Orchard pool, preventing new entries or internal circulation. This action, combined with the existing withdrawal mechanism, will restore the ability for any node operator to verify that Zcash's supply limit has not been violated, regardless of whether exploitation occurred in the past. The upgrade aims to restore the system's long-term credibility through user-verifiable supply integrity.

Odaily星球日报45 dk önce

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

Odaily星球日报45 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片