zkSync生态稳定币协议Syncus将推出全新范式DeFi借贷平台

Odaily星球日报2023-12-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

质押 Syncus DAO 治理代币 $SYNC 即可获取流动性。

12 月 19 日,zkSync 生态项目 Syncus 宣布即将推出全新范式的 DeFi 借贷平台,用户质押$SYNC 后,即可以 85% 的比率借入 USDC 或 ETH,重新获得流动性。

Syncus (https://twitter.com/Syncus_Fi)是一个去中心化、通过交易税收入分红给质押用户的稳定币生态协议,旨在修复和改进 Olumpus 的可持续性问题,通过正向激励建立一个自我增长的国库系统,

区别于传统 MakerDAO、AAVE 等平台质押主流币借稳定币出来的借贷模式,Syncus 实现了质押其 DAO 治理代币 $SYNC 即可获取流动性,这源于 Syncus 采用了类似于 Olympus(OHM)的(3 , 3)增长飞轮模型,经济模型机制会驱使其治理代币$SYNC 处于正螺旋向上增长。

若用户不质押直接选择出售,则需要向 Treasury 国库缴纳 15% 的税,只能获得 85% 的流动性;若用户参与质押借贷,只有$SYNC 价格回落到借出资产金额以下,质押品会被清算,和卖出获得的流动性一样; Syncus 倾向于让用户优先考虑质押,越来越多的用户选择质押,国库资金池体量也越来越大,APY 收益相应增高,会带动用户进一步质押,进而刺激$SYNC 价值增长,而若用户选择卖出则会被收取 15% 的税也一定程度上限制了用户退出的意愿。

因此这套运转机制会最终产生一个增长飞轮 Flywheel:高收益率 - 更多需求 - 更多交易量 - 国库增长 - 收益率更高 - 不断重复。

相比之下,Olympus 则采用了一套债券设计,意味着随着 OHM 代币增长,用户会始终获得打折代币,相当于打折销售。这个机制过分依赖 OHM 代币的持续增长,只有 OHM 价格增长,用户才有动力买打折期货债券。但问题是如果 OHM 价格增长到一定程度,始终能有人获得打折 Token,无疑于让代币价值被第三方暴力提取。

Syncus 认识到 Bonds 债券机制的潜在风险,移除了 remove 债券打折销售机制,转而采用了一个双向收税+国库持续分红的更稳健可持续的机制。

再加上 Syncsu 借贷平台的质押$SYNC,即可获得 85% 的流动性主流代币模式,用户会无压力的选择将持有的 Token 质押,进而大大减少了代币抛压,为其增长提供持续动能。相较 Syncus 的打折销售债券模式,质押 Token 打折‘套现“的模式会更有吸引力,也减弱了累加的正螺旋崩盘风险。

据了解,zkSycus IDO 5 分钟募集了 187 个 ETH,目前市值 2000 万美元,Treasury 资产 160 万美元,APY 116.4% (动态浮动),已分红资产 123 万美金。近一周$SYNC 市场表现也尤为良好,市值已经增长超 7 倍。

zkSync生态稳定币协议Syncus将推出全新范式DeFi借贷平台


İlgili Okumalar

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1 saat önce

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1 saat önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5 saat önce

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片