India's Controversial Crypto Tax Should Be Cut After Failing to Achieve Aims, Think Tank Urges

CoinDeskPolicy2023-11-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-11-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The government lost $420 million in potential revenue and failed to improve transparency because the tax regime prompted as many as 5 million crypto users to shift transaction...

  • India's controversial 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) crypto tax policy needs to be lowered to 0.01%, a technology think tank has proposed based on a new study.
  • India introduced a 30% tax on crypto profits and the 1% TDS on all transactions in July, 2022, resulting in traffic taking a nosedive and exchanges going into survival mode.

India's most controversial crypto policy, a 1% transaction tax deducted at source, needs to be lowered to 0.01% to help the government achieve its aims of boosting revenue and improving transparency, a New Delhi-based technology policy think tank said in a new study.

The tax, a form of income tax known as TDS, has prompted as many as 5 million crypto traders to move their transactions offshore, and has cost the government a potential $420 million in revenue since it was introduced in July, 2022, according to the study by the Esya Centre.

The findings in the "Impact Assessment of Tax Deducted at Source on the Indian Virtual Digital Asset Market" go one step further than the group's previous report, which revealed Indians moved more than $3.8 billion in trading volume from local to international crypto exchanges after the controversial crypto rules were announced. They show that, at least in part, the tax failed to achieve one of its stated aims: taxing people who are earning profits.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

"While the VDA market in India is burgeoning, the benefits of the same are being reaped by offshore exchanges," said Vikash Gautam, the report's author, referring to virtual digital assets. "Data shows that two likely policy objectives of the tax – to curb speculation and create transparency around transactions – have not been achieved."

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government announced a 30% tax on crypto profits and the 1% TDS on all transactions in February, 2022. At the time, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the intention behind the TDS, the more controversial of the levies, was to increase traceability in India’s crypto ecosystem. Domestic and international participants warned it could kill the industry, and Indian crypto traffic nosedived in the months following its implementation, forcing almost all major exchanges into survival mode.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Representatives of the domestic industry have pleaded with the authorities on numerous occasions to lower the taxes. In addition to tracing transactions, the intention behind TDS was to discourage "speculative activity," according to the study, which analyzed transaction volumes from 13,000 peer-to-peer (P2P) traders and surveyed crypto exchange executives.

The Finance Ministry had not responded to a CoinDesk request for comment on the study by publication time.

The study also urged the government to clarify the applicability of TDS to offshore platforms.

"It just isn't enforceable, as per stakeholders," Gautam said in an interview. "It is possible to be done with international cooperation, but we do understand it is a long process. Some of the other countries have some arrangements with international exchanges to track that."

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

İlgili Okumalar

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit16 dk önce

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit16 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit21 dk önce

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit21 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit22 dk önce

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit22 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片