多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

Odaily星球日报2023-11-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-11-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

武器依然锋利——足够快的反馈和几乎能够忽略的交互成本。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 0xAyA

多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

11 月 2 日,链游 Axie Infinity 开发商 Sky Mavis 与韩国游戏开发商 ACT Games 达成合作,计划将 ACT 的所有游戏引入 Ronin Network。Sky Mavis 将帮助 ACT 将其 Android 和 PC 端集换式卡牌游戏(TCG)Zoids Wild Arena 迁移到 Ronin Network。Zoids Wild Arena 最初基于 Polygon 推出,计划于 11 月 8 日迁移。“我们致力于保持游戏玩家和 IP 粉丝所期望的高标准游戏设计和用户体验,”ACT 游戏业务发展负责人 Viggo Chung 表示。

尽管 Sky Mavis 此前因 6 亿美元资产被盗案件而备受争议,且在去年的融资中表现不佳, 1.5 亿美元融资目标中仅募集 1100 万美元,估值缩水 1/3 。但作为 Ronin 区块链的创建者和主要开发者,Sky Mavis 依然在为自己的Web3游戏生态系统不懈努力,且继续和各种游戏工作室达成协议,以吸引他们加入 Ronin 生态并成为其中真正的一份子。

持续建设游戏生态

此前,Sky Mavis 与四家游戏工作室合作:Directive Games、Bali Games、Tribes Studio 和 Bowled.io,每家工作室现在都在利用 Ronin 开发自己的游戏。“这一宣布标志着一个新的转变,”Sky Mavis 联合创始人 Jeffrey “Jiho” Zirlin 在旧金山游戏开发者大会上接受采访时表示,Axie 只是 Ronin 游戏生态系统的开始,并相信 Axie 可以超越其第一款游戏,并最终成为像任天堂的马里奥或三丽鸥的 Hello Kitty 一样受众广泛的 IP 组合。

而在这其中,Directive Games 是跑在最前面的一个,其第一款 Ronin 游戏 《The Machines Arena》是一款 4 v 4 竞争性多人射击游戏,玩家在科幻环境中作为坦克角色、辅助或造成伤害的英雄相互战斗。该游戏采用第三人称视角,将提供多人游戏和单人游戏模式。

《Machines Arena》目前在 PC 上处于测试阶段,计划在 Epic 游戏商城上发布,Directive 还制定了 Machines Arena 的跨平台计划,即将在 iOS 和 Android 上推出移动版。

多家游戏入驻,Ronin是否重回“链游基础设施叙事”的中心?

而今年 7 月,Sky Mavis 宣布与 NFT 系列 CyberKongz 达成合作,其中包括向部分Web3游戏玩家提供数字资产奖励。 CyberKongz 将于 7 月 27 日推出新 NFT 系列 Genkai,总供应量为 2 万个,其中 4000 个将通过 Sky Mavis 内部 NFT 市场 Mavis Market 在 Ronin 上提供。Sky Mavis 表示,将使用 Genkai NFT 奖励每个 Mystic Axie 持有者。 此外,CyberKongz 将与 Ronin 合作开发一款以 Genkai 为特色的游戏。Sky Mavis 业务开发主管 Kathleen Osgood 表示,新游戏将通过与现有的 Axie Infinity 体验集成来实现互操作。

就在上个月,专注于元宇宙的P2E MMO 游戏 Pixels 迁移到 Ronin Network,此前 Pixels 完成 240 万美元种子轮融资,由 Animoca Brands 与 PKO Investments 领投。

什么样的链适合游戏?

尽管资产失窃事件一度使 Ronin 被抛弃,甚至一蹶不振,但他们仍然没有放弃自己的目标——为Web3游戏提供可定制的专用链,并同时保持低成本。这同时也是各路链游何以能最后胜出的关键基础:足够快的反馈和几乎能够忽略的交互成本,能够使区块链世界以外的用户无感知的参与。

而有 Axie 的成功案例在前,大多数项目方依然选择相信 Sky Mavis 团队的能力,并最终决定加入 Ronin 开发自己的游戏,生态系统愈发壮大的 Ronin 能否在与 Oasys 等游戏专用链的竞争中胜出,成为链游们最终的首选链?让我们持续关注。

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit4 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片