埋伏下一个Celestia，这些模块化项目值得关注

Odaily星球日报2023-11-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-11-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

六大模块化潜力项目及交互建议一览

原文来源：Biteye

Celestia 的大碗猪脚饭空投引起了对模块化热潮的关注，其是第一个但绝不是最后一个发币的模块化项目，我们后续可以关注哪些该赛道的机会呢？本期 Biteye 为大家带来了六大模块化潜力项目及交互建议；

  • Fuel

  • Altlayer

  • Polygon Avail

  • Caldera

  • Eclipse

  • 其他建议

Fuel

@fuel_network的方向是建立一个模块化执行层，通过使用欺诈证明机制和 UTXO 实现并行交易，和轻型客户端来提高安全性。 Fuel 的联创也是 Celestia 的联创之一，去年 9 月完成融资$ 80 M。

交互方式：

1、安装 Fuel 原生钱包，去其生态网站中选取项目交互：https://alpha.fuel.network/ecosystem

2、测试网跨链桥交互：https://alpha.fuel.network/bridge/?from=eth&to=fuel

Altlayer

@alt_layer是一个 Rollup-as-a-Service 协议，允许开发人员快速定制具有欺诈/ZK 证明的 Rollups，预计 2024 年上线主网。 Polychain 领投融资了$ 7.2 M，并入选了第六季币安 MVB 孵化计划。

交互方式：

1、完成官方发布的银河任务： https://galxe.com/unsupportedregion

2、去 Altlayer 的 Dashboard 中创建 Flash 层： https://dashboard.alt.technology/login

Dymension

@dymension是 Cosmos 的模块化结算层，旨在让开发人员通过 RDK 和专门的结算层快速部署特定应用程序的 Rollup。 去年 6 月完成$ 6.7 M 融资，创始人声明说预计会有第 2 轮融资。

交互方式：

1、进入官方 DC 领水

2、通过官方网站进行各 Rollup 间的代币交换： https://portal.dymension.xyz/ibc

3、安装 Go 配置相关硬件运行节点，详情可见文档：https://docs.dymension.xyz/validate/dymension-hub/overview/

Polygon Avail

@AvailProject是专注于模块化区块链中数据可用性层的提供商，允许 Rollup 将数据发布到 Avail 中存储并选择其他网络进行结算。 Polygon 联创之一脱离 Polygon 出走而后带领的项目，目前暂未融资。

交互方式：

目前 Avail 在举办 Validator Spotlight 活动，用户可以填表加入成为测试网的验证者：https://twitter.com/AvailProject/status/1715008696835600451

Caldera

@Calderaxyz是一个 Raas 服务，其创新在于将数据可用性与结算层解耦，定制化的 Rollup 可将交易内容发送到以太坊或者专门的 DA 层，如 Celestia 来优化交易成本。 Caldera 融资$ 9 M，Drangonfly，红杉领投，1kx 等机构参投。

交互方式：

1、在其测试网上进行跨链交互：https://testnet.caldera.dev

2、交互以该项目为底层的网络，如 Manta Pacific，Injective 等。

Eclipse

@EclipseFND是一个模块化结算层，跟 Caldera 类似，它可以通过选择所需的共识和 DA 层来创建自定义执行链，从而为特定用例创建最佳组合提供了可定制的特性，Eclipse 在执行环境上支持 EVM 和 SVM（支持 SolanaVM 被认为是 Eclipse 的优势 zhi），并计划在未来支持更多虚拟机，同时在 DA 层上已经支持 Celestia，未来可能支持 Eigen DA 和 Avail 等协议。 Eclipse 共进行了两轮融资，总融资额为$ 15 M，其中 Polygon Ventures 跟 Polychain 参投。

交互方式：

1、Eclipse 的主网已经上线，可以多关注与其合作的项目，交互这些项目来获得一些权重。

项目可参考：https://eclipse.builders/partners

Celestia 是目前 Eclipse 支持的 DA 层，可以继续关注 Celestia 的交互，比如质押$TIA，运行 Celestia 轻节点，详情可见：https://www.eclipse.builders/partners

其他建议

最后一点 Last but not least，除了直接参与项目方的交互，以下方法也可以帮助普通用户获取空投

• 质押 atom 或者 osmos，$TIA 这次给质押 75 刀以上的有 50 个低保的空投，$TIA 空投以后也可以部分质押

• evm 链交互，对于一些大项目方来说，即使不是 evm 生态的项目，也会给到 evm 参与者，很多拿了 Arb 和 Op 空投的地址，这次都有$TIA，重点是主网 tx+二层 tx+一定余额+防女巫，点击查看详情

原文链接

İlgili Okumalar

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 saat önce

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 saat önce

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 saat önce

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 saat önce

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片