交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

Odaily星球日报2023-11-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-11-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Binance仍具号召力,而Bitget等平台也正在迎头赶上。

LaunchPad 一直是加密领域财富效应的象征。虽然今年加密市场行情处于下行通道,多个项目上线即破发,但多家头部交易所上线的 LaunchPad 项目仍有不错的表现。

本文将综合比较各大交易所 LaunchPad 项目的回报率、平台上新速度、玩法模式等维度,揭秘哪家头部交易所的 LaunchPad 更具造富效应。

1. 项目收益率对比

根据 Coingecko 和 CryptoRank 的数据, 2023 年以来头部交易所的 LaunchPad 项目上线后都有不错,平均最高收益率均在 10 倍以上。

其中,表现最为亮眼的是 Bitget。其 LaunchPad 所有项目的平均历史最高收益率为 39 倍,排名第一;而 Bybit 和 Binance 紧随其后,平均历史最高收益率分别为 32.3 倍和 29 倍。以单个项目的最高收益率而言,Bitget 于 7 月份上线的 TYPE 最高涨幅达到 68 倍,是所有交易所 2023 年上线 LaunchPad 项目收益率最高的。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所 LaunchPad 项目表现)

另外,平台币的价格表现也间接决定着 LaunchPad 项目的收益率。由于参与各大交易所的 LaunchPad 均需持有平台币,如果平台币价格波动较大甚至出现了暴跌,将导致 LaunchPad 项目的收益无法弥补平台币下跌的亏损。

今年以来,平台币整体表现差强人意。虽然多数平台币的价格较年初有所上涨,但却不及比特币 2023 年的上涨幅度(BTC 较年初上涨 107% )。所以,如果以 BTC 本位计算,绝大多数平台币的表现都不及格。而 Bitget 的 BGB 是唯一一个涨幅超过 BTC 的平台币,目前其价格较年初已上涨了 168% ,成为了 2023 年表现最好的平台币之一。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所平台币表现)

2. 项目上新速度对比

此外,上线新项目的数量也从侧面反应出了一个 LaunchPad 的造富能力。

进入 2023 年以来,单从上币数量来看,Bitget 更为积极。截止目前 Bitget 的 LaunchPad 已上线了 5 个项目。10 月 26 日,Bitget 宣布将上线新一期的 LaunchPad——T 2 T 2 ,这是一个类 Friend.tech 项目。而 Binance 已在今年上线了 3 个 LaunchPad,排名第二。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

(2023 年头部交易所 LaunchPad 上线项目数)

除了上线更多的 LaunchPad 项目,Bitget 也首发上线了多个行业热门币种(如 BLUR 等);除此之外,Bitget 还设置热门叙事币种专区,如 AI、MeMe、BRC 20 等。

3. 玩法模式对比

经过了多年的发展,目前 LaunchPad 的玩法已基本固定——通常是持有平台币获得参与抽签的资格,中签后兑换新项目代币。各大主流交易平台均采用这种模式,但它对用户的吸引力却在减少。

近期,Bitget 在新一期 LaunchPad 中采用全新的拼团模式,降低了参与门槛(50 BGB 起投)。从参与人数来看,该项目开启不到一周,已有 4000 多个团队拼团中,参与人数近万人。

交易所LaunchPad造富效应哪家强?

小结

从以上分析来看,Binance 在 LaunchPad 上仍具号召力,保持着较高的上新速度和投资回报率,而 Bitget 等平台也正在迎头赶上,不仅有更高的投资回报率和上新速度,还有更多元化的玩法。

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片