杀出新机遇? 争议纷纷的 Bitcoin Rollup 是什么?

MarsBit2023-07-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-07-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Ordinals 协议带出的 Bitcoin NFT 热潮,正在引导 Bitcoin 生态发生新的转变,越来越多的参与者开始探讨 Bitcoin 的可扩展性问题。

.details .details-cont p, p {word-break: normal; text-align: unset} p img {text-align: center !important;} Ordinals 协议带出的 Bitcoin NFT 热潮,正在引导 Bitcoin 生态发生新的转变,越来越多的参与者开始探讨 Bitcoin 的可扩展性问题。 
在之前的文章中,我们介绍过「闪电网络」等 Bitcoin 第 2 层扩容解决方案。除上述解决方案外,在 Bitcoin 上应用 Rollup 协议提升可扩展性,也正在吸引更多的关注。
Bitcoin 的 Rollup
讲到 Rollup,通常都会联想到以太坊。
但在 2022 年 10 月,John Light 已发布了报告Validity Rollups on Bitcoin,展示了 Bitcoin 上应用 Rollup 协议的可行性规划和应用方法。
注:Validity Rollups on Bitcoin 报告可通过下方网址查阅:https://bitcoinrollups.org
Bitcoin 搭建的是相对简单的区块链架构,并希望让所有用户都可以在链上运行「节点」,在有需要或必要的时候,用户也可以轻松成为链上区块的开发者。
但是,如果一条区块链致力于要实现能让「所有」用户都轻松地运行完整节点,它一定需要设立规则限制这条链上验证区块时的计算量。
这样的矛盾,其实是去中心化与算力分布规模的矛盾。伴随 Bitcoin 的发展,这种紧张关系愈发明显,而能够缓和这种紧张关系的关键解决办法,就在于区块链可扩展性的提升。
提升可扩展性,目前关注度较高的解决方案包括通过分片、链上优化或链下设置通道解决。「闪电网络」就是在链下搭建支付通道,汇总到链上结算,通过减少交易次数实现扩展的解决方案;而应用 Rollup 协议的解决方案则是一种试图在链上放置尽可能少的数据,同时保持交易执行在链外的解决方案。
两者的区别在:「闪电网络」的大量交易数据保存在链下,但部署 Rollup 协议并不是将大量交易数据放在链下处理,它依旧是一种在链上进行数据优化的扩展解决方案。

数据

△ Bitcoin Rollup 分层展示示例图
图源/bitcoinrollups.org
上图展示了 Rollup 协议在 Bitcoin 上的分层应用:在 Bitcoin 的第 2 层有 2 个 Rollup 协议, 一个用于提供数据可用性,一个用于提供安全性支付和合约;在 Bitcoin 的第 3 层也有 3 个 Rollup 协议,也分别用于不同的用例 ,包括 P2P 支付、金融合约、游戏资产转让。
Rollup 的类型  
目前,应用在 Bitcoin 上的 Rollup 解决方案,讨论热度最高的是  Sovereign Rollup 解决方案(常译作「主权 Rollup」) ,与过去常见的经典 Rollup 协议,两者的主要区别在于如何利用主网、是否独立于主网
应用经典 Rollup 协议的解决方案,使用区块链的第 1 层(即「主网」)作为数据的可用层和结算层,相关数据不仅会存放在主网上,第 2 层相关数据也会写入到第 1 层。同时,交易由主网上的智能合约进行验证,比如以太坊上的知名 Rollup 项目 Arbitrum、Optimism 等。
应用 Sovereign Rollup 的解决方案,仅使用区块链的第 1 层作为数据的可用层,但不使用第 1 层执行结算。存放在第 2 层的数据,不会被写入到第 1 层,有一定的独立性。同时,交易由 Sovereign Rollup 上的节点进行验证,即使用 Sovereign Rollup 所在的第 2 层进行执行结算。

数据


数据

△ Sovereign Rollup 在链上的分层结构图 & 验证逻辑展示图
图源/celestia.org
Sovereign Rollup 运作方式的价值在于:无论第 1 层主网是遭遇了黑客攻击,还是需要进行技术升级,第 2 层都不受影响;其次,第 2 层并没有丢失第 1 层的数据安全性和抗审查性——这样的运作方式,对于 Bitcoin 这条主网算力受限的区块链而言,无疑是更可取的。
了解 Rollkit   
Bitcoin 社区对 Sovereign Rollup 的关注兴起于 2023 年 3 月。
彼时,Celestia 开发的开源技术框架 Rollkit 刚刚宣布完成了一项能将 Rollup 数据直接存储在 Bitcoin 链上的研究。此后,开发人员能够使用 Rollkit 在 Bitcoin 上部署 Rollup 协议提升可扩展性,并且最大限度地降低网络操作成本。
而 Rollkit 框架最大的特点之一是:可以允许开发人员自定义选择数据可用性层和执行层,同时支持开发人员进行 Sovereign Rollup 的部署。

数据

△ Rollkit 模块化开发框架
图源/rollkit.dev
应用展望 
Rollup 在以太坊上的积极应用部署,已经在逐步改变区块链用户对于以太坊上交易、数据存储、链上验证的感知。
虽然,Rollup 在 Bitcoin 上的部署尚处于起步阶段,但伴随 Rollkit 等开发工具的功能演进,也许在不久的将来,Rollup 同样会给 Bitcoin 社区带来更多值得探索的新范式。

İlgili Okumalar

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit17 dk önce

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit17 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit36 dk önce

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit36 dk önce

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit36 dk önce

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit36 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片