长推:对红杉资本《The New Language Model Stack》文章的8点分析

MarsBit2023-06-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-06-16 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

干货非常多。很多内容对AI创业者应该会有不少帮助

注:本文来自@FinanceYF5 推特,其是@33daoweb3 成员,Gofans顾问,原推文内容由MarsBit整理如下:
红杉资本6月14日发布最新文章《The New Language Model Stack》
访谈了投资Portfolio里的33家小到种子轮,大到已经上市的公司后总结出来的。
全文总共有8点分析,干货非常多。很多内容对AI创业者应该会有不少帮助
Thread:

AI人工智能


1.几乎所有公司都在产品中用到语言模型
几乎每一家公司都在将语言模型构建到他们的产品中
- 从代码和数据科学副驾驶,到为客户、开发者、员工和纯娱乐提供的聊天机器人。
许多公司正在用AI优先的视角重新设想整个工作流程。
这些只是几个例子,而且只是个开始。
2.这些应用主要基于API、检索和编排,但开源使用也在增长
-65%的公司已经将应用投入生产
-94%的公司正在使用基础模型API
-88%的公司认为检索技术
-38%的公司对像LangChain的框架感兴趣
-15%的公司从头开始或使用开源资源构建了自定义的语言模型

AI人工智能


与每一位实践者交谈的结果显示,AI的发展速度太快,以至于很难对最终的技术栈有高度的信心,
但大家一致认为,LLM API将继续作为一个关键支柱,
其次是检索机制和像LangChain这样的开发框架。
开源和自定义模型的训练和调整似乎也在增长。
语言模型技术栈的其他领域也很重要,但成熟度较低。
3.公司希望根据自己的上下文来定制语言模型
目前,有三种主要的方式来定制语言模型:
从头开始训练自定义模型,难度最高。
微调基础模型,难度中等。
使用预训练模型并检索相关上下文,难度最低

AI人工智能


4.如今API调用和训练模型是相互独立的,但未来两者将慢慢融合在一起
我们可能会觉得我们面临着两种技术栈的选择:
一种是利用LLM API的技术栈
另一种是训练自定义语言模型的技术栈
越来越多的公司对训练和微调自己的模型产生了兴趣。随着时间的推移,LLM API技术栈和自定义模型技术栈会越来越融合
5.技术栈正在变得越来越易于开发者使用
LangChain通过抽象化常见问题,帮助开发者构建LLM应用:
-将模型组合成更高级的系统,
-将多个模型调用链接在一起,
-将模型连接到工具和数据源,
-构建能够操作这些工具的代理,
-以及通过简化语言模型切换的过程,帮助避免对供应商的依赖。
6.语言模型需要变得更可靠(输出质量、数据隐私和安全性)
许多公司希望有更好的工具来处理数据隐私、隔离、安全、版权和监控模型输出。
来自金融科技到医疗保健的受监管行业的公司特别关注这一点
随着政策的明确和更多的安全措施到位,语言模型将得到更好的信任
7.语言模型应用将变得越来越多模态
8.目前还仅仅只是初期阶段
AI刚刚开始渗透到技术的每一个角落,只有65%的受访者今天已经开始尝试,而且其中很多都是相对简单的应用。
基础设施层(我理解就是中间层的意思)将在未来几年内快速发展
原文:
https://twitter.com/michelle_fradin/status/1669117628521271298

İlgili Okumalar

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit23 dk önce

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit23 dk önce

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit1 saat önce

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片