Bitcoin’s dominance knocked by ETH’s post-Shapella rally

Cointelegraph2023-04-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-04-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Ether (ETH) prices have topped the psychological $2,000 level following the Shapella upgrade this week and the result is a decline in Bitcoin (BTC) market dominance.

Ether (ETH) prices have topped the psychological $2,000 level following the Shapella upgrade this week and the result is a decline in Bitcoin (BTC) market dominance.
According to data from the analysis site btctools.io Ether’s market share climbed to 19.8%, an over 1.1% boost in the last 24 hours while Bitcoin's dominance slid by just under 1%. Since the beginning of the year, ETH dominance has increased by 7.6%.
Bitcoin’s market dominance has fallen to 47.7% as Ethereum’s market share increased. The post-Shapella ETH rally has knocked BTC off an almost two-year high in terms of market share.
BTC's market share tapped 48.8% on April 12 following its rally to $30,000, the highest it’s been since July 2021 when it came just shy of 50%. Additionally, BTC has not been over 50% dominant since April 2021.
Bitcoin's dominance remains up 13.6% since the beginning of the year, according to TradingView data.

Chart plotting Bitcoin’s dominance since late 2022. Source: TradingviewThe market share rise in both BTC and ETH has been at the expense of altcoins, most of which have been lackluster during the recent rally of the two top coins.
Bitcoin and Ether combined represent around 68% of the total crypto market. Roughly 10% is stablecoins meaning the other 10,800 or so tokens, as listed on the price analytics platform CoinGecko, have a combined share of just 22%.

The market cap share of the top coins over one month shows a slight increase for ETH and a decrease for BTC. Source: CoinMarketCapMarket dominance is calculated by looking at an asset’s market capitalization compared with the total crypto market cap which is currently at an eleven-month high of $1.33 trillion.
ETH prices have surged 10.25% over the past 24 hours. As a result, the asset tapped an eleven-month high of $2,122 during the April 14 morning Asian trading session according to Cointelegraph data.
Ether momentum has been driven by a successful Shapella upgrade on April 12 which released staked ETH on the Beacon Chain.
BTC has managed a 2% gain on the day reaching an intraday high of $30,862 during the April 14 morning Asian trading session.

İlgili Okumalar

NeoCloud Three Giants: NBIS, IREN, CRWV – Which One Has More Investment Value?

This conversation analyzes the three leading "Neocloud" companies—NBIS (Nebius), IREN, and CRWV (CoreWeave)—in the context of the AI compute boom. The core thesis is that a severe GPU shortage will persist for 3-5 years, creating a massive, durable opportunity for specialized GPU cloud providers to supplement hyperscalers like AWS and Azure. Key differentiators are highlighted: CoreWeave is the early leader with the highest activated power and revenue, focusing on high-value AI training. IREN possesses the largest locked-in power capacity (4.5 GW) but has only secured Microsoft as a major customer so far. Nebius is positioned as the long-term pick due to its unique focus on building an inference-focused software stack ("token factory") and its exceptional engineering-centric team, led by a mathematician CEO with a proven track record. The discussion debunks bearish narratives, noting that Nebius recently raised prices for H100/B200 GPUs by 30-70%, indicating strong pricing power and contradicting fears of rapid GPU depreciation. A simple revenue model is presented: 1 MW of power equates to ~$10M in annual revenue. Nebius's guidance of 5 GW by 2030 implies $50B in revenue, vastly exceeding current consensus. All three companies are expected to succeed in the near-to-medium term due to overwhelming demand. However, for long-term (5+ year) investment, the preference is for Nebius due to its team, software strategy, and valuable stakes in subsidiaries like ClickHouse. The conversation also identifies the networking layer (e.g., Arista Networks) as a critical, underappreciated adjacent opportunity in the AI infrastructure build-out.

marsbit6 dk önce

NeoCloud Three Giants: NBIS, IREN, CRWV – Which One Has More Investment Value?

marsbit6 dk önce

Microsoft to Discontinue Using Claude: Too Expensive, or a Calculated Move?

Microsoft is discontinuing internal access to the AI coding assistant Claude Code for its engineers, citing high costs and transitioning them to its own GitHub Copilot CLI. Reports indicate that Claude Code's usage-based pricing model led to significant expenses, with estimates of $500-$2000 per engineer monthly, prompting cost reviews even at large firms like Uber. While Microsoft officially attributes the move to cost, analysis suggests it may also be a strategic move. Microsoft allowed internal use of Claude Code for six months to benchmark it against Copilot, gathering feedback to improve its own product. This "experiment" highlights deeper challenges: Microsoft lacks a competitive in-house general-purpose AI model, heavily relying on external partners like OpenAI and Anthropic. Claude Code has gained substantial market traction, surpassing Copilot in features like context window size and task completion rates, and is eroding Microsoft's control over the developer ecosystem. The shift signals broader industry concerns over AI pricing models and the strategic risks of dependency on external, rapidly evolving AI tools.

marsbit7 dk önce

Microsoft to Discontinue Using Claude: Too Expensive, or a Calculated Move?

marsbit7 dk önce

Google Cracks Down on 'AI Poisoning'

Google has taken a strong stance against "AI poisoning," a new form of manipulation where advertisers subtly feed information to influence AI-generated answers like those in Google's AI Overview. Unlike traditional SEO, which aims for higher website rankings, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) seeks to have a brand or product recommended within the AI's response itself. This is particularly valuable as AI summaries, often perceived as neutral and comprehensive, can shorten the consumer decision path and directly influence purchases. The article illustrates the issue with a "hot dog experiment," where fabricated content was quickly picked up and presented as fact by AI. GEO exploitation is potent because AI models aggregate information from various sources—reviews, articles, forums—and can mistake coordinated marketing campaigns for genuine consensus. This threatens the core credibility of search engines. While Google's updated spam policy now explicitly covers attempts to manipulate AI-generated content, enforcement faces challenges. Google can leverage its long experience fighting SEO spam, using penalties like ranking demotion. However, sophisticated "gray area" tactics, such as sponsored third-party reviews or industry reports, are harder to distinguish from legitimate promotion. Other AI players, like Microsoft, have taken a more open approach to GEO, viewing it as a new channel for brands. Ultimately, as AI becomes a primary information source, maintaining the trustworthiness of its answers is a critical challenge for all platforms.

marsbit29 dk önce

marsbit29 dk önce

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

When Futu Becomes a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Status as the New Hard Currency for China's Middle Class Following a severe penalty announcement from Chinese regulators on May 22nd targeting offshore brokerages like Futu, its app community unexpectedly transformed into an impromptu matchmaking platform. Users posted相亲 (matchmaking) requests, explicitly seeking partners with overseas residency or citizenship, revealing a stark new reality: for China's middle class, an overseas identity has become a crucial asset. The regulatory crackdown, which restricts mainland Chinese residents from opening new accounts to buy overseas securities like US stocks, has sharply escalated the value of a foreign passport or permanent residency. This status now acts as a gateway to global asset allocation—including US equities, offshore property, and foreign currency deposits—effectively becoming a new form of "hard currency." Its scarcity, non-transferability (except through marriage, inheritance, etc.), and role as a hedge against domestic uncertainty have driven its premium. The article traces the evolution of how China's middle class views overseas resources: from an investment for opportunity (2000s), to risk diversification (2010s), and now to a mandatory "insurance policy" for financial access. With the regulatory window closing for many, the demand is shifting towards securing such status for the next generation through international education. The surreal scene of high-performing investors posting dating resumes underscores a 2026 where financial talent can be secondary to the right passport.

marsbit1 saat önce

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

marsbit1 saat önce

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

**Title**: Understanding Bound: The Escape Mechanism of "Multi-Sig + Time Lock" and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box **Summary**: Bound Exchange, evolved from the earlier radFi platform, introduces a novel approach to Bitcoin trading by combining self-custody security with exchange-like speed. Its core mechanism relies on a 2-of-2 multi-signature (multi-sig) address for user deposits. One private key is held by the user via a passkey, and the other is held by Bound. This setup requires both keys to sign any transaction, preventing Bound from unilaterally accessing user funds (non-custodial). To address the risk of Bound becoming unavailable, a 3-month timelock is integrated into the Bitcoin script. After this period, users can withdraw their assets with just their single signature, ensuring an escape hatch. For trading, Bound operates a concentrated liquidity AMM. However, as Bitcoin L1 lacks smart contracts, the AMM curve, liquidity management, and trade price calculations occur off-chain in Bound's backend database. On-chain Bitcoin transactions serve only as final settlement receipts for pre-determined amounts. This creates a centralization point: the critical sequence of trade execution—which determines the exact price along the curve for each order—is managed off-chain by Bound in a non-transparent "black box." While the 2-of-2 setup protects user本金 (principal), the pricing and ordering of trades introduce potential operational MEV risks, as the order processing is invisible and unverifiable on-chain. In practice, users can also connect external wallets (like Unisat) for fully self-custodied trading, but this requires manually signing every transaction. The platform currently supports deposits of BTC and Runes only.

marsbit1 saat önce

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures