3月区块链生态被盗总金额超过7亿美元,较典型安全事件超30起!

成都链安2022-04-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-04-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

2022年3月区块链安全事件较2月份大幅上升,攻击类安全事件被盗总金额超过7亿美元。

又到了每月安全盘点时刻!据成都链安【链必应-区块链安全态势感知平台】安全舆情监控数据显示:2022年3月,各类安全事件仍然时有发生,3月发生较典型安全事件超『30』起。
【DeFi方面】暴露出来的安全风险创下2022开年以来的新高。本月发生的跨链桥Ronin攻击事件可能是DeFi历史上涉及金额最高的一次攻击,损失超6亿美元。(点击阅读)其他DeFi协议也屡遭攻击,其中闪电贷和合约漏洞利用是黑客最青睐的攻击手段。另外,本月【诈骗跑路/加密骗局方面】相关跑路事件也是层出不穷。本月【NFT/元宇宙方面】安全事件有所增加,其中钓鱼攻击方式需要重点关注。

br

 DeFi方面 
共发生『13』起典型安全事件
No.1  3月5日,抵押借贷协议Bacon Protocol遭受闪电贷攻击,损失约96万美元。
No.2  3月10日,算法资产协议Fantasm Finance因合约漏洞被攻击,损失约262万美元。
No.3  3月15日,DeFi 协议 Hundred Finance 与 Agave 遭遇闪电贷攻击。黑客利用两个协议中的可重入漏洞窃取了超1,100万美元。
No.4  3月15日,多链衍生品平台Deus Finance在Fantom遭遇黑客攻击,损失或超过300万美元。
No.5  3月20日,BNB Chain和以太坊上的 Umbrella Network 奖励池被抽取,黑客从中获利70万美元。
No.6  3月20日,跨链DEX聚合协议li.finance遭受call注入攻击,损失约60万美元。
No.7  3月22日消息,Fantom生态稳定币收益优化器OneRing发文表示遭到闪电贷攻击,黑客窃取逾145万美元。
No.8  3月23日,Solana 链上的算法稳定币 Cashio Dollar遭到黑客攻击,损失约4800万美元。
No.9  3月26日,InuSaitama疑似遭遇套利攻击,共获利约430个ETH。
No.10  3月29日,期权协议Auctus合约存在漏洞,黑客利用漏洞从未取消授权的用户中获利约72万美元。
No.11  3月30日,Axie Infinity侧链Ronin遭遇黑客攻击。攻击者控制了9个验证节点中的5个,并使用窃取的私钥来伪造假提款,最终获利约6.2亿美元。这可能是DeFi历史上金额最大的一次攻击。

br

No.12 3月30日,以太坊上DeFi 项目BasketDAO的BMIZapper因漏洞遭到攻击,黑客获利约120万美元。
No.13  3月31日,Voltage Finance借贷平台遭遇攻击,约400万美元被盗。
 诈骗跑路/加密骗局方面 
共发生『7』起典型安全事件
No.1  安全机构监测到$DAOKing-Lucky DAO为诈骗项目,其管理员已将505枚BNB存入Tornado.cash,并事先进行了虚假的智能合约升级。
No.2  NFT项目NFTflow已跑路,目前其官方社交账号(@NftflowStarkNet)已注销。
No.3  NFT项目WW3Apes发生Rug Pull,目前已注销其社交媒体账号。与 WW3Apes网站使用同一IP地址的GodZape项目同样发生Rug Pull,并转移了约20枚ETH的资金。
No.4  NFT项目REALSWAK已跑路,其官方社交账号(@REALSWAK)已注销。诈骗者已将1300枚BNB转移至TornadoCash混币。
No.5  BNB Chain上DeFi项目BNB DEFI已跑路,项目已关闭其社交媒体群组,并转移约255枚BNB。
No.6  安全机构监测显示,@BinanceNFT_BFT系伪造的Binance NFT推特账户,正在推广「貔貅盘」骗局。
No.7  BNB Chain上项目BuccaneerFi已跑路。目前项目社交媒体账号以及社群已被删除,约841枚BNB被已转入Tornado.Cash。

br

NFT/元宇宙方面 
共发生『6』起典型安全事件
No.1  3月13日,BNB Chain链上的元宇宙金融项目Paraluni遭受黑客攻击,黑客获利逾170万美元。其中约1/3被盗资金(230 ETH)已流入龙卷风。
No.2  基于Arbitrum的TreasureDAO NFT交易市场被曝发现漏洞,黑客以几乎零成本的价格获取了100多个NFT。
No.3  3月14日,NFT项目Wizard Pass的Discord社区被诈骗者入侵,诈骗者发送假信息以获得用户NFT完全访问权限,造成多枚NFT被盗。
No.4  3月27日,金融NFT项目Revest Finance被攻击,黑客盗取大量相关代币并获利约200万美元。
No.5  APECoin空投遭受闪电贷攻击,攻击者获利约82万美元。
No.6  Defiance Capital创始人Arthur热钱包被盗,60枚价值约69万美元的NFT在链上被转移。本次盗窃事件或为电子邮件钓鱼攻击。

br

 其它方面 
共发生『4』起典型安全事件
No.1  Convex Finance发布博客表示,投票锁定的CVX(vlCVX)合约存在漏洞,用户存款是安全的,不存在任何风险。
No.2  3月7日消息,韩国一代币开发商高管因窃取加密货币被判入狱5年,因其非法将用业务资金投资的加密货币转移到自己的私人账户。
No.3  三名男子因涉嫌4000万美元的加密货币投资欺诈被美国司法部起诉。
No.4  上海警方破获一起涉案金额超1亿元虚拟货币网络传销犯罪案,抓获犯罪嫌疑人10余名。
🌀注意 🌀
鉴于当前区块链安全领域的新形势,『成都链安』在此总结:
从总体上看,2022年3月区块链安全事件较2月份大幅上升,攻击类安全事件被盗总金额超过7亿美元。针对层出不穷的攻击事件,『成都链安』也为开发者提供了如下安全建议。
Ronin跨链桥被攻击事件:1.注意签名服务器的安全性;2.签名服务在相关业务下线时,应及时更新策略,关闭对应的服务模块,并且可以考虑弃用对应的签名账户地址;3.多签验证时,多签服务之间应该逻辑隔离,独立对签名内容进行验证;4.项目方应实时监控项目资金异常情况。
Revest Finance被攻击事件:建议在合约设计时严格按照检查-生效-交互模式设计,并在ERC1155 token相关DeFi项目中加入防重入的功能。
Paraluni安全事件:合约开发者在开发过程中进行完整的测试以及第三方审计,并养成使用Openzeppelin库的ReentrancyGuard合约来进行重入攻击的防范。
TreasureDAO安全事件:建议开发者在开发多种代币的销售贩卖合约时,需要根据不同代币的特性来进行不同情况的业务逻辑设计。

İlgili Okumalar

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbit6 dk önce

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbit6 dk önce

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit15 dk önce

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit15 dk önce

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit16 dk önce

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit16 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片