Bitcoin bulls stumble at $23.4K as Fed’s ‘disinflation’ sparks BTC price rally

Cointelegraph2023-02-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-02-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Bitcoin price action returns to tackle familiar resistance, with bulls failing to make fresh inroads toward $25,000.

Bitcoin (BTC) rebounded to key resistance on Feb. 8 as crypto markets got a boost from a familiar source.

BTC/USD 1-hour candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingView

”“

Powell: “Disinflationary process” is here

”“

Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView showed BTC/USD reaching the important $23,400 zone on Bitstamp overnight.

”“

The pair reacted positively to the latest comments from the United States Federal Reserve, which also sent equities higher during the Feb. 7 Wall Street trading session.

”“

Fed Chair Jerome Powell again mentioned “disinflation” during his appearance, reinforcing market hopes that interest rate hikes could cool more quickly in line with inflation. These stemmed from the latest meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on Feb. 1, where the Fed raised rates by 0.25%.

""

“The message that we were sending at the FOMC meeting last Wednesday was really that the disinflationary process — the process of getting inflation down — has begun, and it’s begun in the goods sector, which is about a quarter of our economy,” he said at The Economic Club of Washington, D.C.

""

Powell nonetheless cautioned that there was “a long way to go” and that the U.S. was in “the very early stages of disinflation.”

""

Despite this, risk assets rallied into the Wall Street close, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite Index finishing up 1.3% and 1.9%, respectively.

""

Bitcoin also erased previous weakness, having dropped below $22,700 earlier in the week, but bulls proved unable to tackle ask liquidity at $23,400 and beyond.

""

That liquidity remained in place on the day, as visible in data covering the Binance order book supplied by on-chain monitoring resource Material Indicators.

BTC/USD order book data (Binance). Source: Material Indicators/ Twitter

""

“Markets rallied into the close yesterday, with Bitcoin’s last H4 candle showing weakness at resistance & printing a shooting star,” popular trader Mark Cullen summarized about the latest events.

""

“I personally am still waiting for the lows to get swept. BUT if the BTC can close a H$ above 23.4k I will look for a push higher.”

""

Michaël van de Poppe, founder and CEO of trading firm Eight, was also encouraged by Bitcoin’s reaction. A flip of $23,300 to a more solid support, he told Twitter followers on the day, would mean that the latest BTC price correction “is over.”

""

BTC/USD traded at around $23,200 at the time of writing, with traders still counting down to volatility returning.

""

Golden cross vs. death cross to resolve in a “few days”

""

Looking ahead, the rest of the week held little by way of important macroeconomic cues for crypto markets.

""

As Cointelegraph reported, eyes were already on next week’s inflation data, coming in the form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) print for January.

""

At the same time, chart analysts hoped for a positive outcome from Bitcoin’s latest “golden cross” on the daily chart — its first since September 2021. At the same time, however, BTC/USD weekly timeframes continued to print a “death cross,” a phenomenon which often preceded further downside in the past.

""

“Many say Death Cross/Golden Cross Lagging Indicator. It is Lagging for those who only think Golden Cross means Bullish, and Death Cross means Bearish. I use this indicator to understand Momentum,” fellow trader Jibon wrote in part of a dedicated Twitter thread on the topic on Feb. 7.

""

Jibon compared the current setup to previous instances in 2015 and 2019 and added that it would take a “few days” for the impact of the crosses to become more obvious.

BTC/USD comparative charts. Source: Trader_J/ Twitter

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit6 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片