Why XRP isn’t moving despite $1.2B in ETF demand

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-12-22Última atualização em 2025-12-22

Resumo

Despite over $1.2 billion in inflows into XRP spot ETFs and consistent institutional demand, the price of XRP has remained relatively stagnant, trading near $1.94. This price action occurs alongside a notable increase in accumulation by large wallets (whales), whose supply has climbed back toward 12.8%. Technical indicators show the asset trading below key moving averages, with RSI at 43 and low buying pressure. The convergence of institutional and whale activity suggests a shift in market control and positioning for a potential future move, even though a bullish price breakout has not yet occurred.

Who holds the power in XRP? Lately, institutional money has moved in, and big wallets are also trying to take control again. And get this! This is all happening with price action that isn’t anything to write home about.

Here’s what you need to know.

ETFs set the tone

Spot XRP ETFs’ inflows have pushed total net assets past $1.2 billion. Even on mellow days, inflows have remained positive. The interest looks extremely consistent (though muted), rather than like a one-off spike.

The trend is interesting, though. Even with the big streak of green, Ripple’s [XRP] price has held near $1.90 instead of reacting impulsively. That’s a big buying sign, with institutions building exposure gradually to set a base.

Whales have some skin in the game

Santiment data indicated that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have begun increasing their share again. Whale supply has climbed back toward the 12.8% range after a brief decline earlier this month.

The move hasn’t been gradual. After dipping in mid-December, large-holder ownership spiked, so holding isn’t passive. They’re positioning.

When whales step in alongside institutional inflows, it means market control is shifting hands.

XRP is trying to steady itself

At the time of writing, XRP traded near $1.94, still below its key exponential moving averages (EMAs). The 20, 50, 100 and 200-day EMAs remained overhead, so the greater trend hadn’t yet flipped bullish.

That hesitation is visible in the momentum as well.

RSI was at around 43, with mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. OBV has also flattened after falling earlier in the month.

That means selling has reduced with no new demand. The MACD was below zero, too, though downside momentum appeared to be slowing.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP price is flat near $1.90, but $1.2B+ in ETF assets and rising whale supply mean holders aren’t deterred.
  • Control is shifting, even without a price breakout.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QDespite over $1.2 billion in ETF inflows, why hasn't XRP's price shown significant movement?

AThe article suggests that institutional money is building exposure gradually to set a base, which is a form of strategic accumulation rather than impulsive buying. This consistent but muted interest, combined with the fact that XRP's price is still below its key exponential moving averages, has resulted in a lack of strong upward price momentum.

QWhat does the recent activity of large XRP wallets (whales) indicate?

AData from Santiment shows that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have increased their share, with whale supply climbing back to around 12.8%. This spike in large-holder ownership after a mid-December dip indicates they are actively positioning themselves, not just passively holding.

QWhat do the technical indicators (RSI, OBV, MACD) reveal about XRP's current market momentum?

AThe RSI was around 43, showing mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. The On-Balance Volume (OBV) has flattened after a previous decline, indicating that selling has reduced but there is no new demand. The MACD was below zero, though its downward momentum appeared to be slowing.

QHow is 'market control' in the XRP ecosystem changing according to the article?

AMarket control is shifting as both institutional investors (via consistent ETF inflows) and large wallet holders (whales) are increasing their positions. This coordinated activity means that power is consolidating among these larger players, even though the price has not yet broken out.

QWhat is the overall sentiment of holders despite the flat price action near $1.90?

AHolders are not deterred. The significant ETF assets exceeding $1.2 billion and the rising supply held by whales demonstrate strong conviction and a long-term positioning strategy, suggesting confidence in XRP's future despite the current lack of price movement.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 2m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 2m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 17m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 17m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar T

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Threshold Network Token (T) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Threshold Network Token (T) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Threshold Network Token (T)Depois de comprar o teu Threshold Network Token (T), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Threshold Network Token (T)Transaciona facilmente Threshold Network Token (T) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

502 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar T

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de T (T) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片