Why Do Chinese Memes Lack Staying Power?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-01-13Última atualização em 2026-01-13

Resumo

Chinese meme coins on BSC experienced a brief surge in early January 2026, led by tokens like “我踏马来了” (I’m F*cking Coming) and “老子” (Laozi), but quickly lost momentum within days. The rally, initially sparked by a tweet from He Yi (Binance co-founder), reflected a recurring pattern within the BSC ecosystem—dubbed “Shandongology”—where meme tokens gain traction through perceived endorsements from CZ or He Yi, even without direct involvement. This culture has led to growing community fatigue and internal division. Many participants expressed resistance to what they see as excessive sycophancy, undermining cohesion and diverting attention from organic meme culture. Unlike the October 2025 wave, which attracted global interest and cross-chain engagement, this surge failed to gain significant traction outside Chinese-speaking communities, limiting liquidity and buyer diversity. Moreover, Chinese meme coins are no longer novel. While they’ve become a recurring category within crypto, their reliance on “Shandongology” and lack of independent cultural identity make them highly susceptible to short-lived hype cycles. Tokens that fail to evolve beyond influencer-driven narratives tend to fade quickly, reinforcing a “pump-and-dump” pattern that shortens each meme cycle.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

"The two-day on-chain bull run is over"—this is the prevailing sentiment in the Meme community today.

Following the surge in October last year, Chinese Meme coins once again sparked a frenzy on BSC in January this year, giving rise to many community-favored tokens (related reading:From "Life K-Line" to "Laozi", a rundown of the top 5 hottest BSC "Chinese Memes"). However, according to GMGN data today, popular Chinese Memes have generally seen pullbacks. Within 24 hours, "I'm F*cking Coming" dropped by 30%, "Laozi" fell by 25%, "Life K-Line" declined over 20%, and "Manager Xiao Ni" plunged over 40%.

Every feast eventually ends, and Memes cool down particularly quickly. Last October, the Chinese Meme hype started during the National Day holiday and lasted a full month before fading. But this time, it ended so abruptly. What exactly went wrong?

Rejection of "Shandong-ology" Undermines Community Unity

This round of Chinese Meme hype was cold-started from a tweet by He Yi. On January 1st, He Yi posted on X with the caption "2026, I'm f*cking coming" to celebrate the New Year. A week later, the同名 Meme coin began to gain traction, eventually listing on Binance Alpha and igniting the Chinese Meme community.

However, along with this came widespread discussion in the community about "Crypto Shandong-ology: which way does the fish head face?"—pointing directly to a整套 Meme launch model on BSC revolving around CZ and He Yi. CZ and He Yi don’t need to personally direct or even know about these tokens; from developers to the community to the Binance alpha team, everyone automatically "gets enlightened." The fate of a Meme is decided by a single tweet.

In February 2025, CZ首次 interacted with a worthless on-chain test token TST on BSC, marking the雏形 of this Meme launch model on BSC. After subsequent small-cycle iterations like the dispute over CZ’s dog and the Dubai narrative, the community figured out the "social nuances" necessary for a BSC Meme hype cycle from cold start to peak.

To make money in such an ecosystem, put politely, one must learn from the top and the excellent; put bluntly, one "absolutely cannot stand upright."

"Is it really different this time?" As this Chinese Meme wave peaked again, countless bloggers asked on social media. This wasn’t just mere meme-ing; it genuinely reflected the psychological shadow left by this "Crypto Shandong-ology" since 2025.

When enough shadows accumulate, they form rejection. Some criticized the BSC ecosystem for going to any lengths to "suck up," blindly截取 content from CZ and He Yi’s tweets, even giving birth to tokens like "Mom," "Dad," and "Laozi," making Chinese Memes increasingly tacky.

Previously, Odaily Planet Daily also analyzed the community debate sparked by "I'm F*cking Coming" listing on Binance Alpha, calling it "a serious blow to genuine Chinese Meme culture" (related reading: How to evaluate the listing of "I'm F*cking Coming" on Binance?).

When rejection of "Crypto Shandong-ology" becomes widespread, searching for community Meme coins without the CZ/He Yi angle itself became a community force. Crypto blogger Honest Mai总 (X:@Michael_Liu93)直言, "Everyone is really tired of sucking up." (The blogger holds 1% of "Life K-Line" tokens)

Regardless, such division ultimately harms the unity of the BSC Meme community. Capital cannot form a合力. When a community-consensus leader fails to emerge quickly, Meme sentiment rapidly dissipates.

Lack of External Liquidity

To sustain a small Meme cycle, there must be price increases, and to sustain increases, there must be new buying pressure exceeding selling pressure. A possible reason for the lack of staying power in this Chinese Meme wave is the absence of external liquidity injection. The market cap was primarily driven up by the Chinese community on BSC, without attracting buying from overseas communities or the Solana Meme community.

The Chinese Meme hype last October had an unprecedented reach. Many overseas Meme influencers sought help on X to join Chinese Meme communities; "Dagou WeChat groups" suddenly saw an influx of English-speaking degens. This wave also prompted other chains to court the Chinese Meme community: Base chain lead Jesse invited the community to build on Base, while Solana founder Toly and Solana Foundation president Lily Liu fueled the hype for the Solana Chinese Meme "Suolala."

This influence溢出 from the wealth effect of Chinese Meme coins translated into tangible on-chain buying power, prolonging the duration of the October hype.

But the January Chinese Meme hype lacked this externality, still revolving around CZ and He Yi’s tweets. The only Chinese Meme with some externality, "Life K-Line" (reportedly covered by CCTV on January 3rd), had its spotlight quickly overshadowed after "I'm F*cking Coming" listed on Alpha.

One piece of this lack of external liquidity: using language filters on X to search for posts and views about recent hot Chinese Memes (e.g., I'm F*cking Coming, Laozi, Small Shareholder) in English-speaking regions shows that, aside from exchange listing announcements with high views, discussion of these Memes in English is scarce.

Hot posts about "Laozi" in the X English section are all exchange listing announcements

Chinese Memes Themselves Are No Longer Novel

A乒乓球 dropped from a height always bounces back lower each time.

Chinese Memes themselves are no longer a sufficiently attractive narrative.

Odaily Planet Daily asserted at the end of October last year that although the October Meme hype ended, Chinese Memes themselves would not die out but would become a fixed Meme category, with periodic hype cycles in the future. (Related reading:After Binance Life, Chinese Memes Evolve from Hits to a Sector)

This also means that if a Meme coin merely has a Chinese ticker and some "position-determines-view" logic for rising, it is destined not to last.

Since last October, the only Chinese Meme coins with lasting vitality are Binance Life and Hachimi. Tokens like Customer Service Xiao He, Cultivation, and Nailong have vanished into history. The representative Memes in this wave were all strongly tied to the "Shandong-ology" of CZ and He Yi and failed to develop an independent culture beyond the "Two Saints'" halo. Thus, they are注定 to lack the生命力 to survive beyond small Meme cycles, like any previous similar token (theoretically, Life K-Line doesn't belong here; its popularity was essentially sparked by the CCTV article).

When the Chinese Meme narrative first emerged, a Chinese Meme coin could rise simply due to novelty. Now, Chinese Memes have become an unremarkable, fixed category. As Chinese Memes fully integrate into the BSC Meme cycle assembly line, and as the market becomes increasingly familiar with this playbook, the ecosystem reverts to a "speed run" mode. The entire Meme cycle accelerates: cold start via "imperial decree," baiting continued interaction, listing on Binance Alpha, and finally, dumping...

This round of Chinese Memes is just a microcosm of that.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main reasons mentioned for the lack of staying power of Chinese Meme coins in the recent cycle?

AThe main reasons include community division due to rejection of the 'Shandong School' dynamics (excessive reliance on CZ and He Yi's influence), lack of external liquidity from international or Solana communities, and the diminished novelty of Chinese Meme narratives as a category.

QHow did the 'Shandong School' concept affect the cohesion of the BSC Meme community?

AThe 'Shandong School' concept, which revolves around creating Meme coins based on CZ and He Yi's social media activity, caused community division. Some participants rejected this sycophantic culture, leading to fragmented consensus and reduced collective buying power, which weakened the Meme cycle's sustainability.

QWhy was external liquidity important for previous Chinese Meme booms, and how did it differ in January?

AExternal liquidity, from international or cross-chain communities, provided additional buying pressure that extended the duration of previous booms (e.g., October 2025). In January, the lack of such external engagement, with minimal discussion in English-speaking communities, resulted in quicker exhaustion of the hype.

QWhat role did Binance Alpha play in the recent Chinese Meme cycle?

ABinance Alpha listings, such as for '我踏马来了' (I'm Coming), acted as a catalyst by amplifying visibility and legitimacy. However, it also intensified community debates over the 'Shandong School' and centralized influence, contributing to the cycle's rapid decline.

QHow has the perception of Chinese Meme coins evolved over time?

AInitially, Chinese Meme coins benefited from novelty and freshness, attracting broad interest. Over time, they became a standardized category within BSC's Meme cycles, losing their unique appeal. The market now operates in a 'pump and dump' mode, with accelerated cycles due to familiarity with the playbook.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHá 24m

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHá 24m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Há 36m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Há 36m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Há 40m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Há 40m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片