When Altcoins Lose Consensus, Excess Returns May Lie in the Neglected 'Ruins of Innovation'

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-07Última atualização em 2026-01-07

Resumo

Currently, the crypto market is dominated by a nihilistic sentiment, driving investors toward "safe" consensus narratives like stablecoins, prediction markets, and RWAs. However, this defensive stance overlooks a key reality: the industry remains largely "pre-fundamental," with speculation, not cash flows, as the primary price catalyst. As the space matures, most altcoins are likely to underperform Bitcoin due to evaporating speculative premiums. The core issue is scale: on-chain revenue remains minuscule globally, and most tokens are still priced on future expectations rather than actual value. Mature sectors face efficient pricing, leaving little alpha. True excess returns will come from innovation—areas where valuation is unclear, narratives are still forming, and new markets are being created. Key innovative sectors to watch include uPOW (utility Proof-of-Work), which ties mining to valuable output; ownership tokens for lightweight startup financing; decentralized AI training and compute markets; and social metaverse experiments. Solana is well-positioned as the leading infrastructure for future speculative activity. In contrast, chasing mature narratives or low-quality consensus plays often leads to overvalued entry points. The greatest opportunities lie not in safety, but in bold bets on novel, hard-to-value innovations.

Written by: Squid

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Part 1: What is the Current Market Sentiment?

"What excites you most about cryptocurrency?"

"Which areas are you investing in?"

I always ask these questions to venture capitalists and hedge fund peers at conferences. They usually have the most macro insights into where the industry is heading. But at last December's Breakpoint conference, the answers weren't very inspiring.

Most answers focused on market consensus narratives:

Such as "stablecoins", "perpetual contracts", "prediction markets", "real-world assets (RWA)", "digital banking".

Some answers revealed deeper skepticism:

For example, "Not much is exciting", "Non-crypto businesses using blockchain infrastructure", "Taking a break and waiting for now".

Overall, the bets seemed to lean more towards industry "maturation" rather than "innovation". Underlying these conversations was a pervasive sense of nihilism.

This sentiment, though rarely stated explicitly, is felt by most. It stems from the endless stream of scams, low-float high-valuation token launches, exchange listing pumps, and KOL marketing games. This sentiment is a reflection of the industry's current state, but it cannot predict the future; one could even argue that the future is unlikely to be a continuation of the present.

Betting on mature narratives or areas with proven product-market fit (PMF) is essentially a subconscious "risk-averse behavior", rooted in this nihilism. Participants want to avoid the worst aspects of the industry and are unwilling to take risks on innovation in an environment where token performance is generally weak.

I believe that by 2026, these directions will not be good choices for liquid trading:

The problem is that market efficiency is still low, and this inefficiency continues to support the prices of many altcoins. Industry maturation means prices will revert to fundamental value – which, in practice, would cause most tokens to decline in the medium to short term. Unless you are shorting, it's hard to find investment opportunities based on fundamentals.

Trend continuation trades in areas with PMF are reasonable in direction but difficult to execute in liquid markets due to the persistent "adverse selection" problem. Most of the time, if you buy tokens in consensus narratives, you are either buying low-quality copycats or entering at ridiculously high valuations.

For example: You say you're bullish on prediction markets in 2025? Which token exactly did you buy?

Part 2: Where is the Real Value in Cryptocurrency?

Industry maturation implies moving towards fundamental pricing. But this exposes a core problem: the fundamental scale is too small to support current valuations and drive the market.

So, what exactly drives token prices? The chart below is a rough breakdown of cryptocurrency market capitalization by asset class, adjusted to illustrate the point more clearly:

Two main adjustments were made:

  • Applied a 75% discount to the entire Layer 1 sector
  • Applied a 50% discount to the entire Application sector

This reflects the view that a significant portion of these two major asset classes lacks the fundamentals to justify their current valuations.

After adjustments, two points stand out:

1. The market size cannot support grand narratives

Despite the focus on the application layer, the actual market size remains very small. Last year's total on-chain fee revenue was about $10 billion, and not all of this revenue accrues to token holders. In a global context, this figure is negligible. One could even argue that the entire on-chain application ecosystem's total valuation, pre-adjustment, is less than that of a single food delivery company like DoorDash.

2. Even after declines, speculative premium still dominates altcoin valuations

Looking deeper:

Fundamentals

Fundamentals determine the price floor. For most tokens, this floor is far below the current price. Even at current valuation levels, the market cap of the vast majority of tokens is still driven by speculative premium – the value assigned because people expect to sell it to someone else at a higher price in the future. This premium is highly correlated with overall market volatility and naturally decays over time. The more mature the narrative, the smaller the room for speculation.

This situation is unlikely to change in the short term. Therefore, as speculative premium erodes, most existing altcoins will underperform Bitcoin. The faster the industry matures, the sooner this underperformance will arrive.

Layer 1

Layer 1 remains an important category, but the rules of the game have changed. The winner-take-most general-purpose blockchains are likely already identified. Marginal technical improvements are less important than the network effects already formed, such as liquidity, developer ecosystems, and distribution channels. New general-purpose blockchains will not receive the premium they did in past cycles. Application-specific chains will gradually be valued as "Application" class assets.

Revenue & Applications

The direction of "focusing on revenue" is correct, but it is often misunderstood in crypto. People often discuss revenue multiples, but there are very few crypto businesses with durable moats. Much of the revenue comes from incentives, and cash flows have historically been fragile. Even with strong businesses and stable cash flows, it's often unclear whether the token can effectively capture this value. A low valuation multiple does not automatically make it a good investment.

The application layer still holds the greatest long-term potential, but solving real problems takes time. From a liquidity investment perspective, there are huge opportunities here, but the timeline is likely longer than the market generally expects.

"We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run." – Amara's Law

The core conclusion remains: No matter how attractive the revenue narrative, no matter how much capital is betting on industry maturation, speculation remains the primary driver of market capitalization. It will take time for fundamentals to expand to a sufficient scale, and until then, valuations will be set by expectations, not cash flows.

Part 3: Trading Directions Worth Watching in 2026

In a single asset or market, speculative premium erodes over time. This is an old story in the crypto world – AI agents, early DeFi, NFTs have all gone through such cycles.

Speculation always flows towards areas where valuation is not yet defined, narratives are still forming, and market size is undefined (imagination space is infinite).

In one sentence: Bet on innovation.

The assets most likely to absorb speculative premium in 2026 typically have the following characteristics:

  • Can create entirely new assets or markets on-chain
  • Have a viable path to obtaining "monetary premium"
  • Are difficult to value due to novelty or unclear cash flow attribution (this is also why the monetary premium narrative is important)
  • Have some form of barrier: technical, cognitive, or access barrier (hard to arbitrage + better distribution)
  • Align with larger global trends – market size has no upper limit

These conditions delay the arrival of market efficiency, prolonging the window of mispricing, thus leaving room for speculation.

Specific Sectors and Projects to Watch

1. uPOW (Useful Proof-of-Work)

uPOW shifts mining output from pure inflation to output with practical utility, turning "mining for distribution" into "mining to add value to assets". This direction has been discussed for a long time, and the underlying technology is now nearing feasibility. uPOW projects are novel, difficult to value, represent a new class of productive assets, and have the potential to gain monetary premium. Currently focusing on two:

@nockchain: Early project, needs time to develop, fits the theme, and benefits from zero-knowledge proof and privacy narratives.

@ambient_xyz: In private pre-mining stage, expected to launch this year. Highly cyberpunk, using POW to provide compute for evergreen large language models.

2. Ownership Tokens

The era of "vibe coding" is here. Small teams developing short-cycle, niche MVPs will become the norm, and some will grow into real companies. Lightweight funding processes and the growth-enabling effects of tokens will continue to have value. The core issue for these tokens is the claim on business value, but various mechanisms are being explored to solve this. Opportunities lie both in the tokens themselves and in the launch platforms. Watching two:

  • @MetaDAOProject: Recommended multiple times, the clear leader in this space
  • @StreetFDN: Earlier stage, positioned to serve offline startups

3. Distributed Training & Compute Markets

Distributed training remains one of the most promising areas in AI x Crypto, with rollout slower than expected. Leading teams are beginning testing, hoping for full launch this year. Beyond the project tokens themselves, they are more likely to spawn secondary applications and token ecosystems built on top. The real liquidity opportunity might be there, although project tokens could also appreciate. Leading teams:

  • @NousResearch
  • @primeintellect
  • @pluralis

4. Social Metaverse

Digital social spaces continue to evolve. Product-market fit remains elusive, but experimentation continues. Expect continued trial and error in this area this year. The winner may not have emerged yet, currently watching:

  • @zora: Shows strong resilience, huge potential for synergy between creator and content tokens
  • @trendsdotfun: Solana ecosystem project, reaching Asia-Pacific markets, not yet widely noticed
  • @tryfumo: Included because it proves – execution itself is a moat
  • @ShagaLabs: Metaverse data direction – expect more projects like this

5. Solana: @solana ($SOL)

General-purpose blockchains have matured. As network effects strengthen, the importance of marginal technical improvements is less than existing liquidity, developer ecosystems, and distribution channels. The winners are likely already determined.

Solana has a strong core ecosystem, a rare long-term vision among builders and capital, and a reliable roadmap for continued scaling. The next wave of speculation will happen on existing infrastructure. Whatever the specific narrative, Solana is structurally positioned to capture a large amount of this activity.

Areas where I see less opportunity: Bots, Meme coins.

Summary

Nihilism is not insight; it is a lagging emotional reaction to price action, a symptom of the industry's problems, not a prophecy of the future.

When sentiment is low, capital retreats to "mature trades" and consensus narratives to avoid risk. But in crypto, as in other industries, playing it safe does not yield excess returns.

The industry is still structurally in a "pre-fundamental" stage, where price discovery is dominated by speculative capital, not cash flow. This shift will take longer than people think.

Speculative bubbles always follow innovation. Believe in innovation, try new applications, spend time with builders, bet on innovation.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason behind the current 'risk-averse behavior' in the cryptocurrency market according to the article?

AThe main reason is a pervasive sense of nihilism stemming from the industry's problems, such as rampant scams, low-float high-FDV launches, exchange listing games, and KOL shilling. This leads participants to retreat to 'mature trades' and consensus narratives to avoid risk.

QWhat does the author argue is the primary driver of most altcoin valuations, even after price declines?

AThe author argues that speculative premium, not fundamentals, is the primary driver of most altcoin valuations. This premium is highly correlated with overall market volatility and decays over time.

QWhat type of assets are most likely to absorb speculative premium in 2026, as per the author's view?

AAssets that are most likely to absorb speculative premium are those that bet on innovation. They typically create new on-chain assets or markets, have a viable path to 'monetary premium,' are difficult to value, possess some form of barrier (technical, cognitive, or access), and align with larger global trends.

QName two specific project categories the author is bullish on for 2026 that involve creating productive assets with real utility.

AThe two categories are uPOW (useful Proof-of-Work), which turns mining into value-additive production (e.g., @nockchain, @ambient_xyz), and Ownership Tokens, which represent light-weight fundraising and growth enablement for small teams (e.g., @MetaDAOProject, @StreetFDN).

QWhy does the author single out Solana ($SOL) as a key infrastructure play, despite arguing that the era of new general-purpose L1s is over?

AThe author believes the winners for general-purpose L1s are likely already chosen. Solana is singled out because it has a strong core ecosystem, a rare long-term vision among builders and capital, and a reliable roadmap for continued scaling. It is structurally positioned to host a significant amount of the next wave of speculative activity, regardless of the specific narrative.

Leituras Relacionadas

Apple's Q3 Results Largely Meet Expectations, Supply and Memory Pressure Drive After-Hours Drop of 6%

Apple's Q3 (FY2026) earnings largely met expectations, but weak guidance and rising costs drove the stock down 6.3% after hours. Revenue of $109.42B slightly beat estimates, and EPS of $2.02 was boosted by a $0.11 tariff refund. Core EPS was $1.91, aligning with forecasts. iPhone and Mac sales were strong, but iPad and Services revenue fell short. Greater China growth slowed. The outlook for the next quarter is concerning. Apple guided for 9-11% revenue growth, below the ~12% consensus, citing significant supply constraints for iPhones, Macs, and iPads due to advanced chip shortages. Gross margin guidance of 47-48% includes a 1-point tariff benefit, implying a core margin of 46-47%, down from 48.1% this quarter. Management highlighted rising memory costs as a major pressure point. While Apple's AI initiatives like Siri are progressing, monetization remains early. With the stock near all-time highs, the combination of in-line results, segment weaknesses, and a cautious outlook triggered significant profit-taking. The focus has shifted from resilient demand to supply chain execution and cost management.

marsbitHá 5m

Apple's Q3 Results Largely Meet Expectations, Supply and Memory Pressure Drive After-Hours Drop of 6%

marsbitHá 5m

Platform Token Soars 15x in Half a Month, Pons Tops Robinhood Chain Charts for Both Token Launches and Trading

In just half a month, the Pons platform token (PONS) surged over 15x in value as Pons solidified its position as the leading token launch and trading platform on Robinhood Chain, capturing both the highest daily token creation volume and transaction volume. Following the exit of previous leader NOXA, competition initially favored Flap before Pons emerged dominant around mid-July. By July 26th, Pons accounted for 77.1% of total trading volume across all Robinhood Chain launchpads. Pons's success is attributed to its streamlined, one-transaction process for deploying a token contract and its corresponding Uniswap V3 liquidity pool simultaneously, eliminating the need for bonding curves or complex migrations. This simplicity, combined with low creation costs and immediate tradability, attracted significant creation activity and speculative trading. The meteoric rise of its native token, PONS, further fueled platform growth. A tokenomics model directing 80% of protocol fees to buy back and burn PONS created a reinforcing cycle: platform usage boosted PONS value, which in turn attracted more users. Looking ahead, Pons V2 aims to expand beyond meme tokens by integrating support for paying fees in stablecoins (USDG) and RWA assets, aligning with Robinhood Chain's broader focus on on-chain finance and stock tokens.

Odaily星球日报Há 6m

Platform Token Soars 15x in Half a Month, Pons Tops Robinhood Chain Charts for Both Token Launches and Trading

Odaily星球日报Há 6m

Qualcomm Chip Price Hike Deals a Blow to Android Phones

Qualcomm has officially announced a new round of price increases for its entire chip portfolio, effective September 1. The hikes, reaching up to 18% for the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, follow similar moves by MediaTek, intensifying cost pressures on the already strained smartphone industry. CEO Cristiano Amon confirmed the plan, citing the need to offset rising industry-wide costs and restore declining profit margins. Qualcomm's Q3 FY2026 results showed a 25% drop in net profit, with mobile revenue plunging 20% year-over-year, hitting its lowest level since 2021. The surge in AI computing demand has led memory manufacturers to prioritize HBM production, creating a shortage in general-purpose DRAM and NAND Flash chips. Their prices soared by 93%-98% and 55%-60% respectively in Q1 2026, causing the memory cost share in smartphones to jump from 10%-15% to over 30%. Coupled with the soaring cost of advanced nodes like TSMC's 2nm and packaging, overall chip costs have reached historic highs. These upstream pressures are forcing downstream smartphone brands like Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo to cut orders for mid-to-low-end models by up to 20% and use cost-saving measures like older chipsets. Reportedly, the Snapdragon 8E5 will be repurposed as a "long-lasting" chip for sub-brand phones in H2 2026. Amid this cost crisis, the Android market remains sluggish. Q2 2026 smartphone shipments in China fell 4.3% year-over-year, marking five consecutive quarters of decline. Major Android brands saw market share drop, while Huawei and Apple, with their in-house chip advantages, gained share. Qualcomm is diversifying into automotive and IoT sectors to reduce reliance on smartphones, but these new segments cannot yet fill the mobile revenue gap. Industry observers warn that the full impact of component cost hikes will hit in the second half of 2026, likely leading to higher-than-expected price increases for Android flagships and a further contraction in the Chinese smartphone market.

marsbitHá 17m

Qualcomm Chip Price Hike Deals a Blow to Android Phones

marsbitHá 17m

Breaking: GPT-5.6 Prices Slashed Effective Today

OpenAI has announced significant price cuts for its GPT-5.6 model API, effective immediately. The entry-level **GPT-5.6 Luna** sees the most drastic reduction, with input prices dropping 80% to $0.20 per million tokens and output prices falling to $1.20 per million tokens. The mid-tier **GPT-5.6 Terra** is reduced by 20%, now costing $2.00 (input) and $12.00 (output) per million tokens. The flagship **GPT-5.6 Sol** maintains its original price but introduces a new **Fast mode**, offering speeds up to 2.5 times faster for double the cost. The company attributes these price reductions to efficiency gains achieved through **GPT-5.6 Sol's own involvement in optimizing its production systems**. The model assisted in rewriting GPU kernels and improving speculative decoding, leading to a 20% reduction in end-to-end service costs and over 15% improvement in token generation efficiency. OpenAI emphasizes this process remained human-led. A key focus of the降价 is to lower the barrier for running **AI agent workflows**. By making the capable, tool-calling Luna model significantly cheaper, OpenAI aims to enable more frequent use in cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks like code review and monitoring. This creates a potential feedback loop: model-assisted efficiency gains lead to lower costs, which enables broader agent deployment, which in turn drives further optimization. The new pricing and features will also apply to Codex and ChatGPT Work subscriptions. The changes intensify competition in the large language model market, with OpenAI directly challenging rivals like Anthropic to respond.

marsbitHá 46m

Breaking: GPT-5.6 Prices Slashed Effective Today

marsbitHá 46m

South Koreans' 'Gambling Nature' is Actually Forced by Life

This article explores how systemic pressures in South Korea, rather than inherent "gambling" tendencies, drive widespread speculative financial behavior. It begins by noting the high frequency of flights from South Korea to Macau, symbolizing the search for outlets beyond domestic restrictions. The core argument is that ordinary life goals—stable employment, home ownership, and financial security—have become increasingly tied to asset markets due to structural economic factors. South Korea's development model, historically reliant on corporate leverage (chaebols), has evolved into a society where household debt and personal leverage are normalized as pathways to social mobility. Key mechanisms discussed include: * **Housing Policy:** Government measures to improve affordability, like extending mortgage terms to 50 years and the unique *jeonse* (key money) rental system, embed high leverage into the housing market. * **Financial Products:** The recent approval and explosive popularity of single-stock 2x leveraged ETFs (e.g., on Samsung and SK Hynix), easily accessed via mobile apps, lowered barriers to high-risk trading. * **Social Pressure:** Media narratives around soaring corporate profits (e.g., SK Hynix) and employee bonuses create a fear of missing out, pushing individuals to use leverage to "catch up." The article concludes that this "leveraged life" is a product of institutional history and policy choices. When traditional paths to success feel constrained, and policy facilitates debt-based solutions for housing and investment, speculative behavior becomes a rational, if risky, strategy for many. The rapid cycle of regulatory approval for leveraged ETFs followed by a market crash and official apology in mid-2026 exemplifies the system's inherent contradictions. Ultimately, the "bet" is not just on assets, but on using future earnings to secure a place in the present society.

marsbitHá 46m

South Koreans' 'Gambling Nature' is Actually Forced by Life

marsbitHá 46m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow