US Probes Crypto Exchanges For Suspected Sanctions Violations Linked To Iran

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-04Última atualização em 2026-02-04

Resumo

U.S. authorities are investigating whether cryptocurrency exchanges have enabled Iranian entities to bypass international sanctions, following a surge in crypto activity linked to Iran. Blockchain data indicates that transaction volumes reached an estimated $8–10 billion over the past year, with both government-linked actors and everyday users increasingly turning to digital assets. Analysts report record inflows into Iranian wallets, reaching $7.8 billion in 2025. The Treasury Department is examining if platforms facilitated sanctions evasion, including moving money offshore or accessing hard currency. Iran’s largest exchange, Nobitex, acknowledged some users transfer funds internationally but stated it employs monitoring systems to detect suspicious activity. Data also shows a gradual movement of assets out of Iranian exchanges, often into self-custodied wallets, rather than abrupt capital flight.

Crypto activity in Iran has expanded rapidly over the past year, drawing renewed attention from US authorities who are now examining whether certain digital asset platforms may have played a role in helping Iranian officials and state‐linked actors bypass international sanctions.

Rising Iran Crypto Volumes

According to a blockchain researcher cited by Reuters, cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran surged to an estimated range of $8 billion to $10 billion over the past year, as both government‐connected entities and everyday users increasingly turned to digital assets.

Estimates from blockchain analytics firms TRM Labs and Chainalysis show that crypto usage in Iran has grown steadily despite mounting restrictions on the country’s access to the global financial system.

TRM Labs estimates that crypto activity in Iran reached roughly $10 billion last year, compared with $11.4 billion in 2024. Chainalysis reported similar growth, saying wallets linked to Iran received a record $7.8 billion in 2025, up from $7.4 billion in 2024 and $3.17 billion in 2023.

US authorities are now investigating if crypto platforms, which weren’t mentioned in the report, have enabled sanctioned Iranian organizations to move money offshore, access hard cash, or pay for items in ways that circumvent sanctions.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, said the US Treasury is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion. Redbord said he had direct knowledge of the Treasury Department’s concerns.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment directly on the investigation but pointed Reuters to a statement issued in September announcing new measures targeting so‐called “shadow banking” networks that support Iran, including those that officials say rely on cryptocurrencies to avoid sanctions.

What Blockchain Data Shows

Inside Iran, crypto adoption has spread widely among the public. Nobitex, the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, told Reuters that industry estimates suggest around 15 million Iranians have some level of exposure to digital assets.

The exchange said it has approximately 11 million customers, with most activity coming from retail users and smaller investors. According to Nobitex, many Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

Data from analytics firm Nansen suggests that some Iranian users moved funds out of Nobitex during 2025. The firm said balances of major cryptocurrencies on the exchange fell sharply from a peak reached around the middle of the year.

Analyst Nicolai Sondergaard said the data indicates that digital assets in Iran have increasingly served as a gradual exit channel rather than a one‐time flight of capital. According to Nansen’s analysis, funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but instead moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025.

Nobitex acknowledged that some customers may use digital assets to move funds internationally, but said it does not track the final destination or purpose of those transactions.

The exchange stated that it employs robust monitoring systems designed to detect potentially suspicious activity and protect user assets. It also said concerns about asset safety following the June hacking incident may have influenced user behavior.

In many cases, Nobitex explained, customers transferred assets to self‐custodied wallets rather than directly to overseas exchanges. The exchange said this approach allows users to secure their holdings temporarily while assessing risks and deciding whether to redeposit funds later.

The 1-D chart shows the drop in the total crypto market cap below $2.6 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the estimated range of cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran over the past year, as cited in the article?

AThe estimated range is $8 billion to $10 billion.

QWhich two blockchain analytics firms provided data showing the growth of crypto usage in Iran?

ATRM Labs and Chainalysis.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason many Iranians use cryptocurrency, as stated by the Nobitex exchange?

AMany Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

QWhat US government department is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion, according to Ari Redbord of TRM Labs?

AThe US Treasury Department.

QWhat did data from analytics firm Nansen suggest about the movement of funds from the Nobitex exchange in 2025?

AThe data suggested that funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025, serving as a gradual exit channel.

Leituras Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 1h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 1h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 3h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 3h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 5h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 5h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 6h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 6h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片