U.S. courts deliver sentencing in SafeMoon case as SBF pushes for new trial

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-10Última atualização em 2026-02-10

Resumo

Two major U.S. crypto fraud cases advanced differently on February 10. John Karony, former CEO of SafeMoon, was sentenced to 100 months in prison after victims testified about financial losses caused by his fraudulent assurances. The judge rejected defense arguments and described the scheme as "a massive fraud." Separately, Sam Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion for a new trial, arguing new witness testimony could weaken the case against him. He was previously convicted and sentenced to 25 years for misusing FTX customer funds. These developments show how crypto cases are diverging—some reaching final sentencing, while others continue through prolonged appeals.

Two of the most prominent crypto fraud cases in the U.S. courts moved in different directions today, 10 February.

In one case, the former chief executive of SafeMoon received a prison sentence following conviction. In another, Sam Bankman-Fried, the former head of collapsed exchange FTX, filed a fresh bid seeking to reopen his case.

SafeMoon CEO sentenced after victim testimony

A federal judge in New York sentenced John Karony, the former CEO of SafeMoon, to 100 months in prison, according to courtroom reporting by Inner City Press.

During the sentencing hearing, multiple victims described how they invested in SafeMoon after being reassured by Karony’s public statements and personal engagement with the community.

Several said the losses reshaped their financial futures, preventing home purchases and affecting education plans.

U.S. prosecutors sought a 12-year sentence, arguing Karony deliberately misled investors and showed no remorse. The defense cited his age and background to mitigate the punishment.

The judge rejected those arguments, describing the scheme as “a massive fraud” and stating it was “more like theft than fraud,” emphasizing that investors had been explicitly assured there would be no rug pull.

The sentence marks a final chapter in one of the most widely followed cases to reach U.S. courts.

SBF files long-shot motion for new trial

In a separate development, Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial on his FTX fraud conviction, according to Bloomberg.

The filing, dated 5 February and docketed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, argues that new witness testimony could undermine the government’s case.

The request is separate from Bankman-Fried’s formal appeal. It comes after a federal appeals court rejected his attempt to secure release while that appeal is pending.

The Second Circuit ruled in December that he had not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success.

Bankman-Fried was convicted in November 2023 on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy and sentenced in March 2024 to 25 years in prison.

Prosecutors said he misappropriated billions of dollars in FTX customer funds to support risky trading at Alameda Research, political donations, and luxury real estate purchases.

Cases enter different phases

Together, the two developments highlight how high-profile crypto prosecutions are diverging in 2026.

While the SafeMoon case has reached sentencing, delivering closure for victims, the FTX case continues to generate procedural filings as its former executive pursues post-conviction relief.

Final Thoughts

The SafeMoon sentencing reflects courts moving toward final judgments in retail-focused crypto fraud cases.
Bankman-Fried’s filing underscores how larger cases can remain active for years through appeals and post-conviction motions.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the prison sentence given to the former CEO of SafeMoon, John Karony?

AJohn Karony, the former CEO of SafeMoon, was sentenced to 100 months in prison.

QWhat did Sam Bankman-Fried file in relation to his FTX fraud conviction?

ASam Bankman-Fried filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial on his FTX fraud conviction.

QWhat was the original sentence that U.S. prosecutors sought for John Karony?

AU.S. prosecutors sought a 12-year sentence for John Karony.

QHow many years in prison was Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to in March 2024?

ASam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024.

QAccording to the article, what did the judge describe the SafeMoon scheme as?

AThe judge described the SafeMoon scheme as 'a massive fraud' and stated it was 'more like theft than fraud'.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

Bitcoin has reached a critical juncture around the $60,000 level, which analysts view as a major technical and psychological support zone. According to a TradingView analysis, a successful hold above this demand area could pave the way for a recovery toward $81,000. However, the warning is clear: a decisive and sustained break below $60,000 would invalidate the bullish outlook, likely triggering stop losses and a deeper market correction. The current setup is described as a binary test—maintaining support keeps the recovery narrative alive, while losing it would signal a shift toward a more significant downturn.

bitcoinistHá 33m

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

bitcoinistHá 33m

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

Venus Protocol now allows tokenized stocks from companies like Apple, Tesla, and Microsoft to be used as borrowing collateral on BNB Chain. This integration brings a key real-world asset (RWA) use case into DeFi lending. Users can deposit these tokenized equities, which are described as 1:1 backed by real shares held by regulated custodians, into isolated pools to borrow stablecoins or BNB without selling their underlying positions. This move expands DeFi lending beyond crypto-native assets, resembling traditional margin finance. It highlights BNB Chain's competition for RWA activity and aims to attract more stable liquidity. However, tokenized stocks introduce different risks, including dependency on off-chain custodians and challenges with collateral valuation due to differing market hours between traditional and on-chain trading. While not an immediate price catalyst, this development is significant within broader crypto trends like compliance pressure and RWA tokenization. Success will depend on growing liquidity, reliable custody, robust price oracles, and clear rules for redemptions and liquidations.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

bitcoinistHá 1h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 11h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 11h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 11h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 11h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 14h