Trump Takes 'Significant Step' in Combating Cryptocurrency Scammers

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-14Última atualização em 2026-08-14

Resumo

On August 12, President Donald J. Trump issued a national security memorandum titled "Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime." The policy targets ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, and identity theft schemes against Americans. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Council, stated this measure is a key step in disrupting scammers who use cryptocurrency to defraud Americans. The memorandum establishes a program for approved U.S. companies to conduct cyber surveillance and operations, managed by a National Coordination Center. Participating firms must contract with the Justice or Homeland Security departments, meet standards, and may need to post a $1 million bond. Loss data highlights the focus: FBI’s 2025 report noted over $20.8 billion in cybercrime losses, with cryptocurrency-related complaints accounting for $11.37 billion and investment scams alone causing $7.2 billion. Previous enforcement, like actions against Huione Group and a multi-nation operation leading to 276 arrests, shows existing infrastructure. The new program differs by creating a permanent channel for private companies to conduct federally-approved missions alongside traditional law enforcement. Coordinated public-private efforts, like Operation Atlantic, have identified victims and frozen stolen funds. Basic consumer precautions remain critical. Agencies now have 60 days to develop implementation procedures that meet legal and constitutional s...

Foreign cybercrime networks could face a U.S. program aimed at disrupting their operations, President Donald J. Trump announced on August 12 in a National Security Presidential Memorandum titled "Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime." According to a White House fact sheet, this policy targets ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, sextortion, and identity fraud schemes aimed at Americans.

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors on Digital Assets, linked this memorandum to measures combating cryptocurrency-related fraud. On August 12, he wrote on X:

"While not specifically targeting cryptocurrency, this action is a significant step toward curtailing the activities of scammers who use cryptocurrency to defraud Americans."

According to the full text of the presidential memorandum, vetted U.S. companies will be able to conduct cyber surveillance and cyber effects operations only after being accepted into the program. The National Coordination Center will manage the initiative, with officials appointed by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security serving as co-executive directors and coordinating the approval process.

Participating companies must sign contracts with one of these agencies, meet technical and personnel standards, and disclose information about related commercial agreements. Implementation guidance may also include providing a bond or deposit of at least $1 million, subject to forfeiture for contract non-compliance.

Why Loss Figures Place Cryptocurrencies in the Spotlight

The losses cited in complaints provide the most obvious financial rationale for this initiative, although these figures reflect the number of reports filed, not the full picture of harm. The FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report recorded 1,008,597 complaints and losses of $20.877 billion, a 26% increase from 2024.

Cryptocurrencies accounted for 181,565 complaints and $11.37 billion in losses, representing over half of the IC3's total. Investment fraud involving cryptocurrency alone led to reported losses of $7.2 billion, making it the largest source of cryptocurrency investment fraud losses in 2025.

These aggregate figures do not mean every dollar disappeared via a blockchain transfer, as IC3 categories can cover multiple crime types or payments. However, they place digital assets at the forefront of federal attention concerning overseas fraud schemes and financially motivated cybercrime.

What Previous Enforcement Actions Show

Previous law enforcement actions illustrate the infrastructure underpinning the administration's new approach to transnational cybercrime networks based overseas. A coordinated June operation against the Huione Group and Prince Group involved sanctions, proposed expanded financial restrictions, cloud infrastructure seizures, and blockchain analytics targeting infrastructure that U.S. officials linked to overseas fraud groups.

International cooperation has already led to arrests, as well as server takedowns and asset seizures related to suspected overseas cryptocurrency fraud networks. According to U.S. officials, an April operation resulted in at least 276 arrests and the dismantling of at least nine alleged fraud centers. Authorities accused the schemes' organizers of directing victims to fraudulent cryptocurrency platforms.

These precedents differ from the August memorandum, which opens a permanent channel for private companies to propose and conduct federally approved missions. Previous cases relied on traditional law enforcement, sanctions, and cross-border cooperation; the new program will add contract corporate operators to that list.

The Role of Security and Consumer Protection Measures

During Operation Atlantic, public-private coordination helped identify victims. This week-long initiative identified over $45 million in cryptocurrency fraud, pinpointed over 20,000 cryptocurrency wallet addresses linked to victims in more than 30 countries including the U.S., U.K., and Canada, and froze $12 million in stolen funds.

Basic wallet safety precautions also reduce risk before any government operation begins, blocking common deception tactics at their source. Precautions against cryptocurrency fraud include verifying website URLs, distrusting unsolicited contacts, and avoiding promises to double deposited funds.

Program officials now have 60 days from August 12 to develop agreed-upon procedures, including selection criteria, target validation rules, and protections for U.S. citizens. No operation can be approved until these procedures meet constitutional, statutory, and international obligations.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the national security memorandum announced by President Trump on August 12, as described in the article?

AThe main purpose of the national security memorandum titled 'Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime' is to establish a program to disrupt the activities of foreign cybercrime networks, specifically targeting ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, sextortion, and identity theft schemes aimed at Americans.

QAccording to Patrick Witt, how does the presidential memorandum relate to cryptocurrency-related fraud?

APatrick Witt, the Executive Director of the Presidential Council of Digital Asset Advisors, stated that while the memorandum is not specifically aimed at cryptocurrency, it is an important step towards stopping the activities of scammers who use cryptocurrency to deceive Americans.

QWhat financial statistics from the FBI's 2025 cybercrime report are cited to justify the focus on cryptocurrency in combating cybercrime?

AThe FBI's 2025 cybercrime report recorded 1,008,597 complaints with losses of $20.877 billion. Cryptocurrency-related complaints accounted for 181,565 reports and losses of $11.37 billion, which is over half of the total IC3 figure. Cryptocurrency investment fraud alone led to reported losses of $7.2 billion.

QHow does the August memorandum differ from previous law enforcement actions against cybercrime networks, according to the article?

APrevious actions relied on traditional law enforcement, sanctions, and cross-border cooperation. The August memorandum establishes a permanent channel for private companies to propose and carry out federally approved missions, adding corporate contractors to the toolkit.

QWhat are some of the requirements and safeguards for companies participating in the new program outlined in the memorandum?

AParticipating companies must sign contracts with the Department of Justice or Homeland Security, meet technical and personnel standards, and disclose related commercial agreements. Implementation guidelines may require a security deposit of at least $1 million, subject to forfeiture for non-compliance. Program staff have 60 days to develop procedures including target vetting rules and protections for U.S. citizens, and no operations can be approved until these procedures comply with constitutional, legislative, and international obligations.

Leituras Relacionadas

Jensen Huang's Daughter: From Chef to an $8 Million Annual Salary

Madison Huang, daughter of NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang, recently made a rare public appearance in Beijing during the 2026 World Robot Conference. As the Senior Director of Product and Technology Marketing for NVIDIA's Physical AI Platform, with an annual salary of approximately $1.2 million, her visit focused on evaluating leading Chinese robotics companies like UBTech, Unitree, and others. This highlights NVIDIA's strategic interest in the burgeoning Chinese robotics ecosystem, a key battleground for the development of Physical AI—technology that enables machines to understand and interact with the physical world. Huang's career path is unconventional. Initially pursuing her passion, she studied culinary arts, worked as a chef, and later held a marketing role at LVMH. She joined NVIDIA as an intern in 2020 after completing an MBA, quickly rising through the ranks. Her brother, Spencer Huang, followed a similar path, closing a cocktail bar he co-founded to also join NVIDIA, where he now works on robotics software. Jensen Huang has publicly addressed nepotism concerns, humorously noting that some "second-generation" employees outperform their parents. The conference itself underscored China's vibrant robotics sector, marked by Unitree's recent blockbuster IPO and a pipeline of companies preparing to go public. While hardware development and manufacturing are advancing rapidly, industry leaders like Wang Xingxing of Unitree point to the next critical challenge: developing the "brain" or AI that allows robots to perform diverse, unseen tasks based on simple instructions. With massive manufacturing scale and diverse real-world testing scenarios, China is positioned as a central player in the global race to define the future of robotics.

marsbitHá 56m

Jensen Huang's Daughter: From Chef to an $8 Million Annual Salary

marsbitHá 56m

He Gave Wang Xingxing the First 2 Million, Now Serves as Chairman for the Next 'Unitree'

On August 19, 2024, Unitree Robotics, China's "first humanoid robotics stock," went public. Its founder, Wang Xingxing, started a decade ago with his self-developed XDog. In 2016, at a critical funding juncture, he received his first angel investment of 2 million RMB from Yin Fangming. This bet has since yielded a return of over 140 times. Yin Fangming is more than just a key investor. He was a co-founder of the AI robotics company ROOBO, whose own venture ultimately struggled. This firsthand experience with the hardware challenges in robotics gave him unique insight when backing Unitree, a company renowned for its hardware R&D and cost control. While his own company faltered, Yin continued investing shrewdly. He partially cashed out some Unitree shares early, reinvesting the proceeds into sectors like energy (e.g., solid-state battery firm TaiLan) and commercial aerospace (e.g., small launch vehicle developer XianDeng Aerospace). However, his most significant move after Unitree is his deep involvement with Galaxy General, a leading embodied AI unicorn. In July 2024, Yin stepped from behind the scenes to officially become its Chairman, indicating a role far beyond a typical investor. This comes as Galaxy General is viewed as preparing for future capital moves. Yin's career has consistently been ahead of the curve—from mobile internet to AI and robotics. Known for his foresight and low profile, he declined an interview for this story, offering only a statement encouraging support for visionary entrepreneurs like Wang Xingxing.

marsbitHá 1h

He Gave Wang Xingxing the First 2 Million, Now Serves as Chairman for the Next 'Unitree'

marsbitHá 1h

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

The article examines the open-source vs. closed-source debate in crypto, prompted by a theft of over $100M in Bitcoin from Coldcard hardware wallets. It clarifies key terminology: true "Free and Open Source Software" (FOSS) grants four essential freedoms (use, study, share, modify), while "source available" code, like Coldcard's firmware, may have usage restrictions. The piece argues that visible source code alone does not guarantee security; actual safety depends on the economic incentives for thorough, ongoing review by skilled individuals. Using Bitcoin Core as a model, the article describes a successful, transparent open-source development culture built on public review and consensus. It contrasts this with the Coldcard case, where a critical bug in a lightly-reviewed, source-available library went undetected for years, highlighting a "tragedy of the commons" scenario where assumed but absent scrutiny creates vulnerability. The economics of licensing are crucial: restrictive licenses can limit the pool of motivated commercial reviewers. Finally, the article explores AI's impact. It cites the Bitcoin Red Team's use of AI to rapidly audit codebases and find vulnerabilities at scale, demonstrating a powerful new tool for security. However, AI also floods projects with low-quality code, straining maintainers. The piece concludes that in high-stakes crypto, only well-audited projects—whether open or closed-source—can withstand evolving threats, with AI both challenging and aiding security practices.

marsbitHá 1h

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片