Traditional Gambling Giants Enter Prediction Markets, Aiming to Outmaneuver Wall Street

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-02-12Última atualização em 2026-02-12

Resumo

Traditional sports betting giants like DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel are entering the prediction markets, leveraging their expertise in odds-setting and risk management to compete against Wall Street firms like Susquehanna and Jump Trading. These betting companies argue that their experience in pricing complex, real-time sports outcomes—such as injuries or weather changes—gives them an edge. However, Wall Street firms are responding by hiring sports specialists and applying their deep financial capital and algorithmic trading experience. As both sides converge—betting firms adopting financial strategies and trading firms gaining sports knowledge—the market is becoming increasingly competitive. This rivalry may narrow profit margins due to tighter spreads but is expected to improve overall market liquidity and user experience.

This article is from: Sportico

Compiled by | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina); Translator | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

As prediction markets explode, two groups are closely watching—one from Wall Street and the other from Morton Street (the headquarters of gaming company Fanatics). On one side are professional financial trading firms, and on the other are traditional gambling service providers. Both believe they have what it takes to become top predators.

Gambling Companies Enter Market Making

Three traditional sports betting service providers—DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel—have all ventured into prediction markets to counter the threat this emerging trend poses to their core businesses. After experiencing a shift in investor sentiment, these companies are accelerating their efforts and view their extensive experience in the gambling industry as a potential competitive advantage.

DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel have all started or plan to offer "odds" through affiliated market makers on their prediction market platforms. This is similar to their traditional sports betting operations, but with a key difference: in prediction markets, they must compete with third parties who can also place orders.

Based on Sportico's discussions with executives and industry analysts, there is no consensus yet that gambling companies directly engaging in market making can achieve higher returns than professional financial trading firms. However, gambling companies are confident in the profit potential of market making.

Peter Jackson, CEO of FanDuel’s parent company Flutter Entertainment, stated during the Q3 earnings call in November: "The core capability required for market makers is the ability to accurately price complex and interconnected outcomes. This is exactly what our core business does every day."

Fanatics already has an active affiliated market maker called Morton St. Market Maker LLC—named after the street in New York City where its parent company is located, within walking distance of some Wall Street competitors. Morton St. Market Maker provides odds for both buying and selling contracts on Crypto.com, the underlying prediction market platform integrated by Fanatics.

Meanwhile, DraftKings and FanDuel have both hinted at having affiliated market-making teams that trade against their clients, though it is unclear whether DraftKings or FanDuel has formally established such entities.

To ensure all users can quickly enter and exit positions at near-fair prices, market makers typically need to provide liquidity on both the "YES" and "NO" sides during specific periods. Their profits come from the small spreads between "buy now" and "sell now" quotes. For example, if a user buys a contract for the New York Mets to win at $0.50, and the market maker previously acquired the contract via a limit order at $0.47, the market maker earns $0.03.

Wall Street’s Counter-Encirclement

On the other side of the gambling companies are professional trading institutions from Wall Street.

Although Wall Street firms like Susquehanna International Group have extensive experience in financial derivatives market making, some industry insiders interviewed by Sportico noted that Wall Street is indeed less adept at setting odds for sports events compared to traditional gambling companies.

Alfonso Straffon, who has worked in market making for both Wall Street junk bonds and sports betting, said: "I would caution Wall Street firms not to underestimate their opponents. The sports betting ecosystem has been around for a long time."

Sports events present more complex risk management challenges for market makers, especially during games, where any development—such as injuries, weather changes, or coaching decisions—can drastically alter the true value of bets. "Parlays" introduce additional risks, and a single mistake can lead to significant losses. If exchanges leverage trading, this risk will be further amplified.

Advanced data models and the ability to access information before the public—these are the advantages of traditional gambling companies—are crucial for mitigating risks.

However, this does not mean gambling companies are guaranteed to win in prediction markets. Another sports betting company founder believes that, with deeper capital and experience adapting to different financial markets, Wall Street will ultimately achieve higher returns.

Wall Street firms like Susquehanna and Jump Trading, which lack long-term sports experience, are racing to hire market-making specialists with sports expertise. Prediction markets like Crypto.com and Polymarket have also posted related job openings for their affiliated trading departments in recent months. Rothera, owned by Robinhood, mentioned an active affiliated market maker in its rulebook (sources suggest it might be Susquehanna). According to a Bloomberg report this week, Jump Trading is simultaneously investing in Kalshi and Polymarket.

Sportico previously reported details about Kalshi Trading (Kalshi’s affiliated market-making arm), which is also working to弥补 its lack of sports experience. Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara stated on X that Kalshi Trading was not profitable in sports and that sports accounted for "less than 6% of its market-making volume" in November.

Competitive Advantages May Gradually Converge

Market making is not a high-margin business. Having multiple companies compete on pricing in the same prediction market naturally compresses profitable spreads. In other words, the more market makers there are in a prediction market, the less profit can be made per bet.

However, although prediction markets with affiliated market makers might prefer to limit the number of market makers,实际操作中情况远非如此简单。Without institutional capital support, overall market liquidity could suffer. Unless affiliated market makers inject significant capital (and assume corresponding risks) to fill the gap, user experience will be directly affected.

This means gambling companies will inevitably compete with financial institutions on the same field, vying for order flow from retail bettors.

Ultimately, as Wall Street institutions hire professionals with sports expertise (and vice versa), the competitive advantages of both sides may gradually converge. But for now, at least, gambling companies entering prediction markets are confident in their chances of success.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main groups competing in the prediction market space according to the article?

AThe two main groups are professional financial trading firms from Wall Street and traditional sports betting service providers from Morton Street (like Fanatics, DraftKings, and FanDuel).

QWhat is the core competency that Peter Jackson, CEO of Flutter Entertainment (FanDuel's parent), believes gives betting companies an advantage in market making?

AHe believes their core competency is the ability to accurately price complex and interconnected outcomes, which is what their core business does every day.

QWhat is the name of the affiliated market maker for Fanatics, and on which platform does it provide odds?

AThe affiliated market maker is named Morton St. Market Maker LLC, and it provides odds on the Crypto.com prediction market platform.

QWhat two specific advantages do traditional betting companies have over Wall Street firms in managing the risks of sports event prediction markets?

ATheir advantages are sophisticated data models and the ability to obtain information before the general public, both of which are crucial for risk management.

QWhat is the expected long-term outcome regarding the competitive advantages of Wall Street firms and betting companies in the prediction market space?

AThe article suggests that their competitive advantages will likely converge over time as Wall Street firms hire talent with sports expertise and betting companies potentially adopt strategies from finance.

Leituras Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 55m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 55m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHá 55m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHá 55m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHá 1h

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHá 1h

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow