Top Market Maker Wintermute Reveals: Are Retail Investors No Longer Trading Cryptocurrencies?

比推Publicado em 2026-02-27Última atualização em 2026-02-27

Resumo

The leading crypto market maker Wintermute reveals a significant shift in retail investor behavior: instead of investing simultaneously in both cryptocurrencies and stocks, retail traders are now choosing between them. Historically, crypto and stock flows moved together, but since late 2024, they have exhibited a strong negative correlation. Key factors driving this change include the structural compression of crypto’s volatility premium relative to stocks, reducing its appeal as a high-risk, high-reward asset. Improved accessibility through fintech platforms has made it easier for capital to move between crypto and equities, while AI-powered tools have enhanced retail traders’ analytical edge in stock markets—an advantage still lacking in crypto due to its unclear valuation frameworks. As a result, crypto is becoming just one option among many in retail portfolios, rather than the primary speculative arena. Investors are advised to adopt a multi-asset portfolio perspective when analyzing crypto markets, as traditional indicators like M2 money supply have lost predictive power.

Source: Wintermute

Author: Jasper De Maere

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

Bitpush Note:

As a leading market maker in the crypto industry, Wintermute handles daily trading volumes amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. Compared to ordinary researchers, they can penetrate the fog and see the most authentic flow of retail funds. In this latest report, Wintermute raises an alarming point for the crypto circle: the "retail faith" that once supported the crypto market is wavering. In the past, cryptocurrencies and stocks typically rose and fell together, but starting from late 2024, this relationship completely reversed—retail investors began making a "choose one" single choice between the two.

Below is the main text:

Retail activity drives the cryptocurrency market. Through speculation, reflexive buying on dips, and agile capital rotation within the token world, retail investors define every major market cycle. However, new data indicates that the relationship between retail investors and cryptocurrencies is changing. For some time, we have observed that the stock market is attracting retail attention at the expense of altcoins. New data from J.P. Morgan's strategy department, combined with our own flow data, now suggests that stocks and cryptocurrencies are increasingly becoming complementary risk assets.

Core Viewpoints

Reversal Phenomenon: Retail investment activity in cryptocurrencies and stocks used to move in the same direction. But since late 2024, the two have shown an inverse relationship: when retail buys stocks, they remain quiet in the cryptocurrency market, and vice versa.
Volatility Premium Compression: The volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was once their biggest attraction to retail, is now structurally compressing. Volatility is no longer a product feature with diversification characteristics in cryptocurrency investment.
Technology-Driven Factors: Some under-discussed technical reasons are accelerating this shift. For example, easier access to cryptocurrencies has dismantled the "closed audience" effect; meanwhile, large language model (LLM)-driven analysis is narrowing the cognitive advantage gap in the stock market, a phenomenon not yet occurring in the cryptocurrency space.
Traditional Indicators Fail: Traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite (such as M2 money supply) are failing. Investors should increasingly view cryptocurrencies through the lens of a multi-asset portfolio, similar to other mature asset classes.

Reversal Phenomenon

By overlaying Wintermute's proprietary crypto retail flow data with J.P. Morgan's retail stock inflow data, we gain a new perspective on the relationship between retail stock and crypto activity.

Historically, the two have maintained synchronized trends until late 2024. At that time, high risk appetite sentiment drove simultaneous buying in both, as they both served, to some extent, as outlets for excess capital (see M2) and risk appetite.

However, since late 2024, this relationship has broken down: as retail floods into the stock market at an unprecedented pace, they are holding back on cryptocurrencies, and the divergence between the two has now reached historical extremes.

Zooming in, we use altcoin market capitalization as a long-term proxy indicator for retail crypto activity.

It closely aligns with our retail flow data and has an impartial and longer historical record. Between 2022 and late 2024, cryptocurrencies and stocks generally moved in sync, both viewed by the retail sector as a type of high-risk investment portfolio. The decoupling in late 2024 is very noticeable, also indicating that retail activity has become more short-term driven, volatile, and to some extent, lacking in structure.

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now allocating between the two, rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.

Focusing on 2025 and overlaying key catalysts makes this dynamic clearer. Several points are noteworthy:

Memecoins and AI agents had their moments in the spotlight when stock market activity stalled, as retail found speculative outlets elsewhere.
Retail continued to aggressively buy the dip in the stock market, both during the tariff policy announcement in April 2025 and in recent market volatility.
After October 10th, the market almost completely shifted towards stocks, and this trend continues currently.

Causality

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now choosing between the two, rather than investing in both.

This new data also confirms this. Retail activity in the stock market has become a new variable that cryptocurrency investors should closely monitor to identify windows of opportunity where retail funds might more sustainably flow into cryptocurrencies.

Volatility = The Product Itself

One reason retail is attracted to and remains active in cryptocurrency is the asset's volatility characteristics. Volatility is the product. It was the initial force that drew retail into the crypto space.

However, although the actual volatility of cryptocurrencies still far exceeds that of the stock market, a trend of structural contraction has formed, and this trend is difficult to reverse in the short term. The volatility ratio of BTC to the Nasdaq Index (NDX) continues to decline, even compressing to below 2x in the first half of 2025.

Thoughts on key drivers:

Market Maturation: With the increasing presence of sophisticated investors and new liquidity tools like ETFs and DATs, the reflexive volatility peaks that defined earlier cycles have been smoothed out.
Market Capacity: At a market capitalization of $2.3 trillion (even 40% below the all-time high), the capital flow required to move the market is far greater than five years ago.

As volatility compresses, the core selling point of cryptocurrencies to retail is also eroding. The "excess volatility" that defined the 21-22 cycle and attracted a generation of retail investors is gone. For retail seeking volatility, stocks are becoming increasingly attractive.

Technology-Driven Factors

In addition to crypto-specific market structure, some under-discussed technical factors are also accelerating this shift.

Crypto Access: The integration of crypto trading by fintech and traditional brokerage platforms (or the integration of stock trading by crypto-native platforms) has lowered the entry barrier, but the more profound impact is on "exit." In previous cycles, funds were effectively locked into the crypto space due to on-ramp friction, leading to organic rotation between tokens. Now, the same seamless on/off-ramps mean funds can easily flow between crypto and stocks without significant obstacles.
Cognitive Iteration: Retail seems increasingly attracted to the stock market, partly due to a new sense of cognitive advantage unlocked through AI. Large language models have significantly enhanced retail's analytical capabilities, creating a sense of a "level playing field."

This feeling is missing in the crypto space. Although analysis based on data is possible, cryptocurrencies lack a consensus valuation framework and token value capture mechanism, coupled with an ever-expanding investable universe, making it difficult for retail to gain that sense of cognitive advantage.

Conclusion

Retail investors, once the most reliable source of self-reinforcing demand for the crypto market, are increasingly satisfying their risk appetite elsewhere.

The stock market not only offers increasingly competitive volatility but also provides a growing sense of analytical advantage, and allows seamless switching to stock trading through apps already on retail investors' phones.

Cryptocurrencies still have a place in retail portfolios, but they are now just one of many choices, no longer the main battlefield for speculation.

This shift should also reshape how investors view the market Some proven traditional indicators have already failed. For crypto investors, merely finding leading indicators for risk appetite combined with a crypto-native framework is no longer sufficient to win. Investors need to increasingly examine cryptocurrencies from a cross-asset portfolio perspective, as is standard practice in stocks and fixed income.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7615177

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Wintermute, what major shift in retail investor behavior has occurred since late 2024 regarding stocks and cryptocurrencies?

ASince late 2024, the relationship between retail investment activity in stocks and cryptocurrencies has reversed. Instead of moving in the same direction, they now show an inverse relationship: when retail investors buy stocks, they are inactive in the crypto market, and vice versa.

QWhat is one of the key technical factors accelerating the shift of retail attention from crypto to stocks, as mentioned in the report?

AOne key technical factor is the integration of AI and large language models (LLMs), which have significantly enhanced retail investors' analytical capabilities in the stock market, creating a perceived 'level playing field' and a sense of cognitive edge that is currently missing in the cryptocurrency space.

QHow has the volatility premium of cryptocurrencies, a major attraction for retail investors, changed structurally?

AThe volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks is structurally compressing. While crypto's actual volatility is still higher, the ratio (e.g., BTC vs. NDX) has been declining and even compressed to below 2x in early 2025, eroding a core selling point that attracted retail investors in previous cycles.

QWhat does the report suggest about the traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite, such as M2 money supply?

AThe report states that traditional leading indicators for crypto risk appetite, like the M2 money supply, are failing. Investors now need to view crypto through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how they approach other mature asset classes, rather than relying on these outdated metrics.

QWhat conclusion does Wintermute draw about the future role of cryptocurrencies in retail investors' portfolios?

AWintermute concludes that while they still have a place, cryptocurrencies are now just one choice among many for retail investors and are no longer the main arena for speculation. Retail risk appetite is increasingly being satisfied elsewhere, particularly in the stock market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHá 1m

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHá 1m

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHá 1m

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHá 1m

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbitHá 5m

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitHá 5m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报Há 5m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报Há 5m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHá 55m