Those Who Can't Buy Anthropic Are Driving Its Shadow Stock to 16 Times Its Value

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-25Última atualização em 2026-03-25

Resumo

A new closed-end fund, VCX, listed on the NYSE, saw its share price surge to 16 times its net asset value due to high demand for exposure to Anthropic, which holds a 21% stake in the fund. Anthropic, recently valued at $380 billion in a private funding round, is not publicly traded, making VCX one of the few ways for retail investors to gain indirect access. The fund's limited liquidity, with most shares locked until September, amplified buying pressure. Similar funds without significant Anthropic or OpenAI stakes performed poorly, highlighting that the frenzy is specifically tied to AI-related FOMO. However, the premium is considered temporary, as it may vanish once Anthropic and other held companies like SpaceX go public, expected in 2026-2027. The phenomenon reflects broader investor anxiety about missing out on transformative AI companies that are reshaping industries while remaining private longer.

Author: David, TechFlow Deep Tide

Last Thursday, a new stock appeared on the NYSE with the ticker VCX.

It is actually a fund. The fund holds shares in companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Anthropic accounts for 21% and OpenAI for 10%.

These companies have one thing in common: none of them are publicly listed, and ordinary people cannot buy their shares.

VCX is one of the very few vehicles available on the market that allows ordinary investors to indirectly hold shares in Anthropic.

Its net asset value is $19 per share. On the first day of trading, it opened at $42, surged to $125 during the session, and closed at $76. On the fourth trading day, it hit a high of $315 intraday, triggering volatility halts twice.

Four days, from $19 to $315.

Investors are essentially paying 16 times the actual asset value to snap up this fund. Not because the fund manager is exceptionally skilled, but because it contains Anthropic.

A month ago, Anthropic just raised $30 billion at a valuation of $380 billion, making it the second-largest financing round globally this year. Its annualized revenue is $14 billion. But it is not publicly listed, has no stock ticker, and you cannot find it in any brokerage's search box.

If you can't buy the real thing, go for the shadow. VCX is currently the shadow of Anthropic, or rather, the shadow of AI FOMO.

Why is it so expensive?

VCX is not a traditional fund.

With ordinary funds, if you think it's expensive, you can wait for it to drop because the fund manager can issue more shares; supply is elastic. VCX is a closed-end fund. The number of shares was locked at the time of listing and will not increase.

More importantly, the vast majority of shares cannot be sold. Investors who bought before February 20 had their shares locked for six months and cannot trade until September. VCX has over 100,000 investors, but only a very small portion of shares are actually available for trading on the market right now.

What does this mean? Many people want to buy, but very few shares are available to buy. A small amount of buying pressure can twist the price out of shape.

So that 16x premium is essentially pricing "how many people want a piece of Anthropic and how narrow the door is." But this hunger wasn't created by VCX itself.

Chart: Top 10 Holdings of Fundrise's VCX Fund

Over the past decade, a structural change has occurred in the tech industry: the best companies are going public later and later, or not at all.

When Facebook went public in 2012, its valuation was $104 billion, which was an astronomical figure at the time. Today, Anthropic's private valuation is more than three times that of Facebook's IPO, but it previously had no clear plans to go public;

OpenAI is valued at $500 billion and is also not public. News about SpaceX preparing for an IPO has been circulating for over a year, with no confirmed date yet.

A decade ago, a company of this size would have long since rung the bell on the NYSE. Now they don't need to. The private market can provide almost unlimited capital, without the pressure of quarterly reports or dealing with retail investors and short sellers.

For founders, this is a rational choice. For ordinary investors, it means that the fastest-growing companies in history are behind a glass wall, out of reach.

VCX was originally scheduled to list on March 9 but was delayed for ten days due to the Iran war. In those ten days, nothing changed—Anthropic's price didn't go up or down, the fund's holdings didn't change a single share. But the delay itself brewed another ten days of anticipation.

When it finally listed, all the pent-up demand from those ten days squeezed through an extremely narrow passage.

Not all shadows are valuable

There are more ways to gain exposure to shares of unlisted companies than just the VCX fund.

But before discussing these avenues, there's a more fundamental question: Anthropic isn't public, so how did a publicly traded fund get its shares?

The answer is the back door.

Large private companies do a funding round every few months, from Series A to Series G, each time letting new investors in. Anthropic just closed a $30 billion Series G last month, with a long list of participating institutions from GIC to Sequoia to Goldman Sachs. These rounds are usually only open to institutional investors, with minimums often starting in the tens of millions of dollars.

But there is a second path.

Just because a company isn't public doesn't mean its shares can't be traded privately. Early employees and angel investors hold shares, and some of them want to cash out early. This creates a secondary market for private companies—not public, not transparent, but real trades happen.

Fundrise started buying on these two paths back in 2022, when valuations of private tech companies had just experienced a crash and prices were cheap. Over four years, they accumulated a portfolio including Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Then they packaged it into VCX, listed it on the NYSE, and now ordinary people can buy it like a stock.

In the same month, at least three similar funds were trading on the NYSE, all selling the same concept:

Selling you, through the front door, what was bought through the back door.

Robinhood created a fund called RVI, listed on March 6 with an issue price of $25. Its holdings include Databricks, Revolut, Ramp—all good private companies. It fell 11% on its first day, closing at $21.

Destiny Tech100, ticker DXYZ, listed in 2024, is a pioneer in this space. Heavily weighted in SpaceX, with a 16% holding. It only added a small exposure to Anthropic indirectly in February of this year. Its price is now hovering around $24.

There's also XOVR, the first ETF approved to directly hold shares of private companies, with SpaceX making up about 21%.

Four funds, similar structures, similar concepts, all trading on the same exchange. But their fates are completely different.

VCX rose 1500% in four days. RVI broke issue price on its first day. DXYZ is lukewarm.

VCX holds 21% Anthropic and 10% OpenAI. RVI's holdings include neither Anthropic nor OpenAI. DXYZ's exposure to Anthropic was added recently and is very small.

This shows that, at least for now, the market isn't chasing "shares in private companies." The market is chasing Anthropic.

Whoever is closest to them is valuable.

That's where Robinhood's RVI lost out. Databricks and Revolut are certainly good companies, but clearly, right now, they are not the name people are willing to pay a 16x premium for.

Shadows also have an expiration date

What are those who bought VCX at $312 betting on?

They are betting that before the door opens, someone else will be willing to pay an even higher price for the privilege of not being able to get Anthropic directly.

However, this door won't stay closed forever.

VCX has over 100,000 investors, and the vast majority of their shares are locked for six months. The lock-up period ends on September 19. At that time, a large number of shares will flood the market, and supply will change overnight from极度稀缺 (extremely scarce) to abundant.

The reason VCX can sell at a 16x premium is half because it contains Anthropic, and half perhaps because so few shares are available to sell. Once the lock-up period ends, the second condition disappears.

There is an even bigger variable.

Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX—all three are rumored to be targeting IPOs in the second half of 2026 to 2027. Anthropic just raised $30 billion last month at a $380 billion valuation and has already hired Silicon Valley law firm Wilson Sonsini for IPO preparations. SpaceX's CFO has been communicating with investors about an IPO since the end of last year, targeting mid-year.

Once the real thing goes public, the shadow becomes worthless.

If you can directly type Anthropic's stock ticker into your brokerage search box, why would you pay a 16x premium for a fund that indirectly holds it?

For example, DXYZ also surged wildly when it first listed in 2024, but as SpaceX's IPO was delayed, the hype faded, and its price fell by more than half from its high.

So, VCX investors are experiencing a classic countdown.

What they bought for 16 times the price is not shares in Anthropic, but a ticket with an expiration date. When the door opens depends on when Anthropic decides to go public.

Before that, the premium is maintained by scarcity; after that, the premium goes to zero.

But the phenomenon of shadow stocks itself is not accidental.

Every technological wave creates the same anxiety: you can't buy the most important companies. In the 2000s, before Google's IPO, Goldman Sachs employees fought fiercely internally for allocations. In 2020, it was SpaceX, and secondary market intermediaries in Silicon Valley became the most sought-after connections overnight.

Now it's AI's turn.

And this time the anxiety is deeper. Anthropic and OpenAI may not be profitable now, but they are rewriting the rules. Because of AI's impact, SaaS stocks crashed, security stocks crashed, and IBM lost $31 billion in a day.

Investors see not just "this company is very profitable," but "if I'm not on its side, I might be on the side it runs over."

The 16x premium of VCX isn't pricing just a fund; it's pricing this anxiety itself.

The ticket will expire, the premium will fade. But as long as AI keeps accelerating, as long as the most valuable companies keep their doors closed, there will be people willing to pay irrational prices for the shadow.

Not because the shadow is worth that much, but because the feeling of being locked out is too expensive.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the VCX fund and why did its price surge dramatically upon listing?

AVCX is a closed-end fund listed on the NYSE that holds shares in private companies like Anthropic (21%) and OpenAI (10%). Its price surged to 16 times its net asset value due to extreme scarcity of tradable shares and high demand from investors seeking exposure to these coveted, pre-IPO AI companies.

QWhy are top tech companies like Anthropic and OpenAI delaying their IPOs, and how does this affect retail investors?

ALeading tech companies are delaying IPOs because private markets provide ample capital without the quarterly reporting pressures and scrutiny from public investors. This excludes retail investors from directly accessing the fastest-growing companies, fueling demand for indirect vehicles like VCX.

QHow did Fundrise's VCX fund acquire shares in private companies like Anthropic?

AFundrise acquired shares through secondary markets, where early employees and investors sell their stakes, and by participating in private funding rounds, assembling a portfolio of pre-IPO companies like Anthropic and OpenAI over four years.

QWhat risks do investors face when buying VCX at a significant premium to its net asset value?

AInvestors risk a sharp price decline when the six-month lockup period ends in September, flooding the market with shares, and if Anthropic or OpenAI IPO, making the indirect fund obsolete as direct ownership becomes available.

QHow does the market's reaction to VCX compare to other similar funds like RVI and DXYZ?

AVCX's 1500% surge dwarfed RVI's drop and DXYZ's stagnation because VCX held substantial Anthropic and OpenAI exposure, while others lacked these specific high-demand AI assets, highlighting that the frenzy is focused on Anthropic, not private equities broadly.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHá 8h

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHá 8h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHá 9h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHá 9h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHá 10h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHá 10h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片