There is no new boss YET

比推Publicado em 2026-03-05Última atualização em 2026-03-05

Resumo

An Iranian deputy military commander from a southern district stated that the Strait of Hormuz has not been blockaded, but only vessels from the U.S. and Israel are prohibited from passing through. This caused a sharp, temporary drop in market prices for oil, gas, and container shipping routes (except European shipping, which remained down). The statement contrasts with Spain's recent refusal to allow the U.S. to use its bases for operations against Iran, where a spokesperson grimly warned of rising energy prices. Around the same time, a U.S. oil tanker sank in the Strait of Hormuz after reportedly “hitting a reef”—a claim viewed by some as corroboration of Iran’s military reports suggesting it was struck by a missile. The information landscape is filled with conflicting narratives, and all claims may be considered both true and false depending on perspective, as psychological and media operations are integral to modern warfare. There is no single authoritative voice in this conflict; even figures like Trump have contributed to the confusion with performative statements. Amid the chaos, all sides are maneuvering for strategic advantage, while humanitarian concerns are overshadowed by geopolitical games. The situation reflects a self-destructive struggle on a global scale.

Just now, uh, a deputy commander of a military district in southern Iran said something: 'We have not blocked the Strait of Hormuz,' only prohibiting ships from the US and Israel from passing. This instantly scared the market into a slide, things like European shipping, oil, gas. Scared the hell out of them, a complete mess, but at this moment, most have deeply V-recovered [except for European shipping].

This is in stark contrast to the Spanish spokesperson who, with a grave expression [at a press conference announcing Spain's refusal to negotiate with the US and allow the use of Spanish bases to attack Iran], repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices are bound to rise.

At the moment of speaking, a US oil tanker 'ran aground' and sank in the Strait of Hormuz. Think about it, 'running aground' in the world's busiest energy transport artery. This actually verifies the Iranian military's combat report. It was sunk by a missile.

Some might say, with so many messages and news, which one is true? Who is fooling whom? Actually, all can be considered true (truth mixed with falsehood, falsehood mixed with truth, remember all is fair in war.), because there is no leading figure or authority now [even if there is, like Trump giving himself a 15 out of 10 (evaluating US-Iran actions at a press conference, scoring himself, full marks 10.), it would be full of drama, and the war of public opinion has always been synchronized with the overall war and runs through it from beginning to end.]. The information released by all parties at any given moment can be considered true, but viewed from the overall situation or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. 'Everyone' is searching for the kind of 'ladder' Littlefinger talked about in the chaos, collecting as many chips as possible.

As for humanity, as for compassion. Amidst the complex and numerous coercions, there is temporarily no place for them to stand. This is the self-inflicted disaster of a group of microorganisms on this planet.

Whatever, bro.

#KingOfWar#King of War

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617058

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the Iranian commander's statement about not blocking the Strait of Hormuz?

AThe market was instantly frightened, causing a sharp decline in prices for routes like European container shipping, oil, and gas. However, these prices mostly experienced a deep V-shaped recovery shortly after, except for European container shipping.

QHow did the Spanish spokesperson's statement contrast with the Iranian commander's?

AThe Spanish spokesperson, with a grave expression, repeatedly stated that oil and gas prices would inevitably rise during a press conference where Spain refused to negotiate with the U.S. on using its bases to attack Iran. This formed a sharp contrast to the Iranian commander's statement that they were not blocking the strait but only banning U.S. and Israeli ships.

QWhat incident is reported to have occurred in the Strait of Hormuz that seemingly confirmed Iran's military report?

AA U.S. oil tanker was reported to have 'run aground' and sunk in the Strait of Hormuz. The article suggests this was a cover story and that the tanker was actually sunk by a missile, validating Iran's military claims.

QAccording to the article, why is it difficult to determine the truth from the various news and messages circulating?

AThe article states that all information released by various parties can be considered true at the moment it is given, but when viewed from an overall perspective or different standpoints, it can also be considered false. There is no single authoritative source, and information warfare is full of deception and drama, making it hard to discern the absolute truth.

QWhat is the overall tone of the article towards the geopolitical situation described?

AThe tone is cynical and pessimistic, describing the situation as a chaotic melee where parties are fighting for leverage, with humanity and compassion having no place. It concludes with a resigned 'so be it' attitude, referring to the conflict as the自作孽 (self-inflicted disaster) of the planet's microbes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Brale Claims New Protocol Could Eliminate a Major Bottleneck for Scaling Branded Tokens

Stablecoin infrastructure firm Brale is launching the ION protocol, a new interoperability solution designed to address a major scaling bottleneck: moving the rapidly growing number of custom-branded stablecoins across different blockchains. The protocol uses a burn-and-mint model, allowing stablecoins to move between chains without requiring pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported network. The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), but new entrants like banks, fintechs, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own tokens for payments and settlements. With over 350 asset-pegged coins tracked, the ecosystem is becoming fragmented. Brale's founder, Ben Milne, states that liquidity between stablecoin programs is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins, as there isn't enough global capital to fund deep liquidity pools for every token on every blockchain. The ION protocol, similar to Circle's CCTP but open to multiple issuers, aims to solve this by eliminating the locked capital requirement of traditional bridges. Initial partners include Monad, Rain, and Coinflow, with a rollout planned from testnet to wider adoption.

cryptonews.ruHá 10m

Brale Claims New Protocol Could Eliminate a Major Bottleneck for Scaling Branded Tokens

cryptonews.ruHá 10m

Cardano Price Forecast for August 2026: Will ADA Triangle Breakout Happen Before or After the CLARITY Act Deadline?

Cardano (ADA) is trading at $0.1642, testing the apex of a symmetrical triangle pattern on the daily chart, which signals an impending directional move. Technical analysis identifies key resistance at the 20-day EMA ($0.1650) and the triangle's upper trendline. A breakout above could target the 50-day EMA at $0.1732, with a cup-and-handle pattern potentially forming. Support lies at the SuperTrend indicator ($0.1536) and the June low of $0.1386. Historically, August has been a weak month for ADA, with a median return of -12.8%. A weekly forecast outlines a volatile month influenced by the imminent August 8th deadline for the U.S. CLARITY Act vote, potential SEC regulatory action, and renewed geopolitical tensions following Iran's missile strike. Key bullish catalysts include the potential passage of the CLARITY Act and a major upgrade integrating Cardano's developer documentation and tools into AI coding assistants like Claude, which could significantly boost developer adoption. On-chain data also shows whale accumulation, a potential Wyckoff accumulation signal. The price forecast presents two scenarios: a bullish breakout above $0.1650 targeting $0.17-$0.1732 if the CLARITY Act passes and AI integration fuels momentum, or a bearish break below $0.1536 toward $0.1386 if the bill fails, seasonal weakness persists, and risk appetite diminishes.

cryptonews.ruHá 19m

Cardano Price Forecast for August 2026: Will ADA Triangle Breakout Happen Before or After the CLARITY Act Deadline?

cryptonews.ruHá 19m

Russian Cryptocurrency Market Valued at Tens of Billions of Rubles

The Russian cryptocurrency market is entering a clearer regulatory phase, with major banks preparing infrastructure for legal digital asset trading. New regulations are set to begin in September, with full implementation expected by 2027. VTB Bank aims to be among the first licensed operators, developing a comprehensive system for buying, selling, storing, and accounting for crypto assets. The market's daily turnover is already estimated at tens of billions of rubles, presenting a significant opportunity for banks to capture market share and commission income through user-friendly, secure services. Key future infrastructure elements will include blockchain, digital accounting, data protection, automation, and potentially AI. For private investors, crypto represents a volatile asset class where earnings can come from trading, investing, mining, or staking, but success depends on risk management, platform security, and understanding regulatory shifts. Bitcoin is seen as a market benchmark, while Ethereum's value is tied to its smart contract ecosystem. Market valuations remain sensitive to regulation, macroeconomic trends, and technological developments.

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Russian Cryptocurrency Market Valued at Tens of Billions of Rubles

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbitHá 1h

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"